12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
This Book Is Garbage !!, September 21, 2007
This review is from: Guns N Roses' Use Your Illusion I And II (33 1/3) (Paperback)
The authour spends more time talking about his own past, (youth, his sister's wedding [wtf??], novels he has read, John Updike, etc.) than he does about the music. "I still don't know much of anything about Guns N' Roses, and wouldn't want to spoil my fog by reading books and articles about them just yet." (p. 25) Yeah, well, I wish you had. I couldn't finish the book. So if you don't want to read about the GN'R double album, Use Your Illusion I & II, this is the book for you.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not what I was looking for, July 10, 2007
This review is from: Guns N Roses' Use Your Illusion I And II (33 1/3) (Paperback)
I'm writing this having read only 36 pages, so take it for what it's worth. I wanted to put a warning out there though -- this is not, to use the writer's words, a reportorial work. That's why I'm disappointed so far. The writing isn't bad but it's more of a personal essay.
I buy 33 1/3 books to learn the details about how albums I like were made. I want to hear stories from the production, what inspired the songs, what the band was going through, etc. This book doesn't seem to fall in that category.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Yikes. Not for the fans!, March 14, 2009
This review is from: Guns N Roses' Use Your Illusion I And II (33 1/3) (Paperback)
Dear Eric Weisbard,
If you hate a band, why write about them? This wasn't some forced album review that you *had* to do. Rather than discuss, as the series suggests, the importance of a record, or how it was made, etc., Eric takes apart the UYI albums.
I didn't expect it to be the dribbly fan prose my personal reflections on the book would have been, but I also didn't expect him to be so self-righteous. Why do I know more about Eric's married life (he has a kid, he's married to a girl he used to listen to one track of GNR with repeatedly) than the album or what it meant? Apparently this album (for the author) heralded the end of rock.
Clearly Mr. W wanted to write the review of Pearl Jam's "Ten" and didn't get the gig. So we have to listen to him rag on the band's persona (rather than their songwriting). He blathers on, and I found myself checking how many pages were left (the book only rings in at a hefty 125, but it feels like War and Peace the way he writes).
He even gets as arrogant as to talk about if *he* had ordered the tracks, what order he would have done, and what he would have kept. You know what *I* would have done, Eric Weisbard? I would have hired an editor :)
But that's not the worst of it. At one point early on he refers to an art critique and decides to bite the style and review the albums WITHOUT LISTENING TO THEM. then, in the final chapter, we're supposed to be grateful that he did so and pour over his pontifications. EXAMPLE GIVEN - this is one gem I dog-eared in my book to share with you all:
"Also, if you hit the same note at the end as you had in the beginning, just more torn and frayed, then nothing has moved forward. Gothic imperatives that have long counterposed Puritan skepticism to the smiley faced motto of American revivalism: "all may be saved"".
If any of you understand what the hell he's on about (this was in reference to the song "Don't Cry", which the author has particular disdain for", lemme know.
This book McSucked.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No