4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
At the Mountains of Madness -- Classic horror, May 13, 2000
This review is from: The H.P. Lovecraft Omnibus 1: At the Mountains of Madness and Other Novels of Terror (Mass Market Paperback)
When I first read this book, I was, frankly, disappointed. I had been hearing about the greatness of H.P. Lovecraft for years, and finally bought this book. The stories, while interesting, didn't hold the fascination that I had hoped. Then I read the book again. I was blown away by it; this book becomes greater every successive time one reads it. The horror, although one knows the ending, still accumulates, and grabs you by the heart when you _know_ that something bad is about to happen. And the stories themselves are amazing, expecially in later readings. The Cthulhu Mythos ones are the best, and in fact, I didn't enjoy the dreamquest stories half as much. All the same, still a thorougly enjoyable book, though better the second time.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
True Genius, April 17, 2011
This review is from: The H.P. Lovecraft Omnibus 1: At the Mountains of Madness and Other Novels of Terror (Mass Market Paperback)
"Genius" is one of those terms that has been over-used to the point where its real meaning is almost lost to us. Almost, but not quite. Because in all candor, what we have here is the genuine article.
As with any work of literary genius, Lovecraft's writing cannot really be analyzed merely by breaking it down into its component parts. But if I may be allowed to simplify in interests of writing a relatively straightforward review, it might be said that I accord Lovecraft this status on two grounds:
First, he is one of those very, very rare individuals to have truly added something the consciousness of the human race. Like Giotto giving birth to the art of painting as we now conceive it - or on an arguably more modest scale, Stan Lee taking his own medium out of the banality of the 1950s and setting in motion the Silver Age of comics - Lovecraft added something to our collective imagination that was not there before. Cosmic Horror was, ultimately, his creation. And it is a far more intelligent and realist offering than many may credit.
As for the origins of this vision, I have myself read that having declared himself an atheist at a very young age, Lovecraft also discovered that he could no longer truly dread the traditional staples of the horror genre: vampires, demons, ghosts, and so on, regarding them as he now did as wholly unbelievable. The horrors to be found within his own works were, apparently, the result of the young Lovecraft asking what he himself could truly fear.
A century later, judged purely by the standards of mainstream science, the answers he came up with seem astonishingly lucid, even prescient. Given that today's astrobiologists estimate that any alien life we might encounter would, on average, be at least a billion years removed from us in evolution, Lovecraft's Great Old Ones must certainly be deemed a far more realist imagining than Klingons or Jawas. In fact, I find that I can't help but hearken to Arthur C. Clarke's famous adage that any sufficiently advanced technology would be indistinguishable from magic. Or, for that matter, hear the voice of Stephen Hawking warning us against the terrible folly of trying to contact intelligent alien life.
My second reason for according Lovecraft genius status is quite simply this: His writing is beautiful. His style often has a formality and at times even a complexity that one does not normally associate with good writing. Indeed, far more often these features are to be found in horrible, awful, stilted writing. If you are at all familiar with the works of the real world occultist A.E. Waite (as Lovecraft himself evidently was), it may help clarify things if I tell you that I once described Lovecraft's style to a friend by saying that Lovecraft wrote like A.E. Waite would write if Waite was actually a good writer.
"But", my astonished friend objected, "A.E. Waite is a TERRIBLE writer"!
"Yes", I agreed, "he is". But, as I went on to explain, somehow Lovecraft pulls it off. His sheer ability to put one word in front of another has an elegance approaching, and maybe even equaling that of Jane Austin - I kid you not. Although I must add that where she is pert and succinct, he is positively baroque.
Very well then. So much for my opinion of Lovecraft's work in general. How about this specific volume?
Well, it is the book through which I personally first became acquainted with Lovecraft's work, so I suppose as such I have some sentimental attachment to it. But I would also recommend it on more objective grounds. Lovecraft wrote in novellas and short stories rather than in full sized novels. This means that if you are going to explore his work, you will need to do so via collections such as this one. And this one is an especially good place to start. I say that for three reasons:
First, it is part one of a three volume series that contains literally everything Lovecraft ever wrote. Thus, should you ever decide that you want to explore Lovecraft's body of work in its totality, you can easily use this series to do so without any difficulty or redundancy.
Second, this volume, the first in the series, is for the most part the best: it contains what the editors considered to be Lovecraft's "A" material. That said, both of the latter two volumes contain some very highly regarded classics as well, including some that I personally regard as equal to or better than at least some of the stories in volume one. For those already familiar with Lovecraft's work, the specific tales to be found in this volume (volume one) are: At the Mountains of Madness, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, The Dreams in the Witch-House, The Statement of Randolph Carter, The Dream Quest of Unknown Kadath, The Silver Key, and Through the Gates of the Silver Key.
Finally, for those of us who still nurture a fondness for old fashioned books made from paper, each volume in the series is a modestly sized and priced paperback that you can comfortably hold while reading lying down in bed, in the bath, or wherever, without feeling like you're supporting a small atlas.
So yes, long story short, this is a book I'd recommend buying.
Even though I did once loan it to a friend who subsequently went insane.
But... One assumes that those two events were unrelated.
Theo.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
