Customer Reviews


108 Reviews
5 star:
 (44)
4 star:
 (21)
3 star:
 (15)
2 star:
 (8)
1 star:
 (20)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars State Years
There are several books about Hillary Clinton that have been advertised recently (including her latest memoir) but this is a good wrap-up of her most recent role as Secretary of State. The authors are obviously well-connected and provided a lot of inside information (although with many unnamed sources). Clinton is a compelling subject and her personality shines through...
Published 1 month ago by Lissa00

versus
9 of 12 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Some fascinating info, with too much insider gossip
HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton tells the story of Hillary Rodham Clinton from the time of her 2008 defeat for the Democratic Party's nomination for President of the United States, to the present, as she contemplates another run for the big prize. Written by Politico White House Bureau Chief Jonathan Allen and White House correspondent (for The Hill...
Published 5 months ago by Rule 62 Ken


‹ Previous | 1 211 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

9 of 12 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Some fascinating info, with too much insider gossip, March 19, 2014
By 
Rule 62 Ken (Abbotsford, BC) - See all my reviews
This review is from: HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton (Hardcover)
HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton tells the story of Hillary Rodham Clinton from the time of her 2008 defeat for the Democratic Party's nomination for President of the United States, to the present, as she contemplates another run for the big prize. Written by Politico White House Bureau Chief Jonathan Allen and White House correspondent (for The Hill newspaper) Amie Parnes, the book pieces together a number of conversations from sources obviously close to the former First Lady and Secretary of State, to give the reader insight into her remarkable drive and energy.

The story begins with the loss of the 2008 campaign, the post-mortem and laying of blame (mostly at the feet of Clinton's campaign manager Patty Solis-Doyle). It goes on to describe the courtship of Hillary by President Barack Obama into the key cabinet position of Secretary of State, the mending of fences and healing of wounds remaining from the hard fought campaign between the two party front-runners and their staffs, and the resulting trust gap that existed. A power struggle develops over whether key positions in the State Department will be filled by Obama's people or Clinton's, and we are told of the strength of confidence possessed by the new Secretary of State in setting her own terms for accepting the President's challenge.

The book goes on to describe the remarkable transition of how Hillary Clinton went from becoming Obama's chief rival to his hardest working and most trusted cabinet member. A secondary story is told of how Bill Clinton goes from becoming one of the people that Obama dreads contact with to becoming an important asset to his re-election in 2012. The authors also tell us of how the Clintons continue to reward their friends and smite their enemies in electoral contests, even at timed when this may conflict with the wishes of the President.

Perhaps the most interesting part of the book for me was the recounting of the details of some of the most notorious moments of Hillary Clinton's tenure at the State Department, including the killing of Osama Bin Laden, and the attack on the Benghazi State Consulate (in which Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed). The book also describes that incident's significance in the 2012 Presidential election, the subsequent senate hearings and the fallout from the incident on the political career of Hillary Clinton.

The final section of the book explores the issue of whether or not Hillary Clinton will run for President and what steps are being taken to prepare for such an eventuality. Although the authors are coy on the answer, they spend far too many pages in the book for the case to be other than their unspoken assumption that a Hillary for President in 2016 Campaign is a done deal. They even speculate on the make-up of the campaign team and fundraising operations.

The authors think very highly of their subject, writing of her ability and work ethic in glowing terms. At times this is suspect, such as when they tend to suggest that she may have been the tipping point for President Obama's decision to go after Osama Bin Laden. The authors are not overly blatant in their praise for their subject, but this book should not be confused with an objective assessment of Hillary Clinton.

At times the book is too full of dropped names of political operatives and staffers that mean nothing to the average reader, and this tends to slow the book down. At other times, stories are told of incidents involving staffers and insiders which might be of interest to Washington based gossip circles, but add little to the history of the book's subject. As a result, only about 40% of this book will hold the reader's interest captive, while the rest is best saved for Washington insiders.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars State Years, August 7, 2014
There are several books about Hillary Clinton that have been advertised recently (including her latest memoir) but this is a good wrap-up of her most recent role as Secretary of State. The authors are obviously well-connected and provided a lot of inside information (although with many unnamed sources). Clinton is a compelling subject and her personality shines through here as she deals with working for a former campaign rival and managing expectations as the most visible face for foreign policy. While the book did highlight some of her shortcomings, I thought it was mostly a favorable account of her last seven years of work. I found this book extremely interesting but definitely political and I am sure it will not be for everyone. I received this book through the Blogging for Books program in exchange for an honest review.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


12 of 17 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Badly-written, silly "journalism": Designed as a "subtle" hatchet job? It's simplistic, poorly researched and unintelligent, March 29, 2014
By 
No matter your political leanings, this book stinks and it's hard to take seriously. The writers are journalistic hacks. Hillary Clinton deserves better--Heck, anybody does. If you are a supporter of Hillary Clinton, you'll probably be outraged. If you dislike Hillary Clinton, you may focus on the shallow and weird bits that read like a poor and ineffective advertising campaign for Clinton and take offense. If you are an interested political observer who tries to maintain a certain objectivity about political leaders, you'll probably feel a little sick reading this garbage. You want detailed examples? Let's start with the title. "HRC." Really? And the photoshopping on the cover photo just supports that inference. The book repeatedly refers to "Clintonworld" and "Hillaryland." No intelligent and respectable journalist uses such lazy and foolish references. The writing is so bad. Did you know that, regarding Hillary Clinton's political career, "the final chapters remain unwritten"? The content is often foolish to the point of ridiculous. A moderately intelligent 12-year-old could tell us this bit of shlock: "Yet the perils of modern diplomacy were clear. American diplomats in war zones were at just as much risk of coming under fire as the military. The difference was that diplomats didn't carry machine guns." Amazing! And Hillary knew that too! Incredible! While sources are unnamed, it hardly matters when the content is just silly trivia and thirdhand gossip, or just plain fiction. The authors purport to tell us what Clinton was THINKING while hearing about threats or attacks on American facilities. Some of the garbage is outright funny: Did you know that one of Clinton's campaign workers was so upset with a congressman that refused to endorse Clinton in 2008 that the campaign worker stopped going to their mutual book club? Pretty hot stuff, huh? According to this very silly book, Hillary Clinton did not want to be Secretary of State and Obama had to woo her. Now, of course, all sort of politics were at play before, during, and after the 2008 election, but these authors clearly have less idea than your average American just what those political maneuvers were. I did get the impression that these authors have no idea when they're being played. People on Clinton's or Obama's staff probably fed the idiots weird stuff to see if they'd grab it--and they did. Get this, on page 58: "She [Hillary Clinton] tried to get in touch with Obama to turn him down. But he wouldn't take her call. At one point, to avoid the rejection, Emanuel told Hillary that Obama was in the bathroom." O-kay. And, with that information in hand, the authors couldn't even see THEN that they're being told to buzz off? The bottom line is that the writers use ten words where one would do, I could edit this book down to 100 pages (my copy is 405) without losing any content, but, while I could improve the writing, the content is worse than worthless. This isn't a real book, it's just trash.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Feeling 'snookered'!, June 26, 2014
By 
Leigh (Seattle, WA USA) - See all my reviews
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
After hearing interviews with the author, I thought this would be an even handed, inside look of the woman who 'would' be President. Instead, I found myself reading an 'on-going' love fest, rose throwing very one sided view. Still, there are no accomplishments noted for the ex-Secretary Of State but a lot of excuses made for her failures. I found this public, sloppy 'licking' of Hillary so cloying I couldn't get through the book!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Targeted at pre-2008 Beltway Insiders, June 20, 2014
By 
O. Beltrami (Thouare sur Loire France) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
As other reviewers have pointed-out, this book is replete with the names of third-tier players, many of which are now long gone. Too many details about the squabbling of these uninteresting people whose behaviour is borderline childish and petulant. The book does offer some insight into the workings of the executive branch ... but one is left wishing for one's previous blissfull ignorance.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Well Researched Presentation of the Clinton State Department, August 29, 2014
This review is from: HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton (Hardcover)
This is a thoroughly researched and well written presentation of the State Department under Hillary Clinton. This serves as an insightful book. Readers learn how foreign policies are made and how they were fashioned by the active style that Hillary Clinton used. This bill is useful to readers interested in international relations as well as Presidential politics.

The following are notes from this book for students of Political Science and International Relations:

Hillary R. Clinton (HRC) has a “bias for action” in seeking action on problems, the authors observe.

The Senators who most helped HRC’s 2008 Presidential campaign included John Kerry, Bob Casey, Jay Rockefeller, and Patrick Leahy.

Sen. Claire McCaskill had been helped by Bill and Hillary Clinton in her 2006 Senate campaign. McCaskill later said of Bill “he’s been a great leader, but I don’t want my daughter near him.” HRC canceled a fundraiser she had scheduled for McCaskill. McCaskill tearfully apologized yet admitted she didn’t want to be caught alone in the same elevator with HRC. McCaskill was the first female Senator to endorse Obama over HRC.

The endorsements of Obama by Ted Kennedy and John Lewis were personally painful to Bill Clinton.

Clinton aids would note of those who betrayed HRC: “Bill Richardson, investigated. John Edwards, disgraced by scandal Chris Dodd, stepped down, Ted Kennedy, dead.:

The Clintons were upset by some junior politicians such as Rep, Jason Altmire. Altmire worked by Hillary Clinton’s health care task force and has been helped get elected to Congress by the Clintons. HRC won Altimire’s district by 31 percentage points. Alltmire upset HRC by remaining neutral. Bill Clinton would later campaign for Altmire’s successful primary opponent, who thought would lose the seat to a Republican.

The Clintons demanded and rewarded loyalty. They often acted accordingly in Democratic primaries.

Lisa Muscatine, a leading speechwriter for HRC, now co-owns the Politics and Prose bookstore.

Bill Clinton and his advisors from his successful 1996 campaign are often blamed for creating the wrong campaign strategy and tone for HRC in 2008.

Obama asked HRC to be his Secretary of State. David Alexrod asked how they could work together after such a tough battle against each other. Obama replied “she was my friend before she was my opponent. She’s smart, she’s tough, she has a status in the world. I’m sure she’ll be a loyal member of the team. I have no concern about her.” Biden supported naming HRC.

The first Cabinet Secretary Obama chose was Tim Geithner at Treasury. HRC was his second decision.

HRC initially turned down the offer. Obama asked her to think about it. For several days, HRC did not want to accept. Some aides were against her accepting.

HRC turned down the offer three ties. Obama asked her to wait to the next day for her final answer. Obama agreed to let HRC pick her own people at the State Department.

Cheryl Mills was selected as Chief of Staff and Counselor to HRC. She was known for her loyalty to HRC. Mills knew how to keep egos in check.

Hama Abedi was HRC’s “most trusted personal aide”. She traveled with HRC everywhere HRC traveled. Her critics claimed Adedin would make small changes to things and pretend she fixed a problem.

Jake Sullivan was third most key aide. He had prepared HRC for political debates. Sullivan was named to lead the Policy Planning Office.

HRC has criticized Gen. David Petaeus for what she believed was an overly optimistic view of the Iraq War. She mended any rift between them and ask Petraeus to work on issues involving Afghanistan and Pakistan along with her trusted aide Richard Holbrooke.

Holbrooke had wanted to become Deputy Secretary of State. Obama aides remained upset over criticisms Holbrooke made of Obama during the campaign. Obama picked Jim Steinberg for the position. Steinberg had hoped to be picked for the National Security Advisor position. Steinberg insisted on being made a permanent member of the National Security Commission. Obama agreed. HRC approved of this as it gave the State Department two Council seats. Steinberg also was trusted by the Clintons.

Jack Lew was named to a post newly created by Congress as Deputy Secretary for Management and Budget. Lew had been an executive at Citigroup.

George Mitchell agreed to be a Special Envoy to the Middle East.

There were some tensions between lower level State Department aides between those who had supported Obama versus those who had supported Clinton.

HRC set up to gain the respect of Obama and of White House aides.

Secretary Geithner spoke Mandarin and had studied China at Dartmouth College. HRC sought to exert dominance on Chinese policies. Geithner was personally fine with this although his aides were upset. Chinese economic policies were reviewed by the State Department.

HRC sought a double digit increase in funding of the State Department. Peter Orszag, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director, approved a small cut in their funding. HRC had Jack Lew, himself a former OMB Director, state this was unacceptable. Orszag then approved a spending increase of slightly more than 1%. HRC wanted more. HRC allied with the Defense Department and the National Security Council who agreed the State Department needed more money. HRC went to Obama and received what she wanted, which was a 6% increase. Included in this was funding for embassy protections in war zones.

Defense Secretary Bill Gates, a moderate Republican, and HRC, a hawkish Democrat, formed an alliance. The Defense Department had increased its role in foreign policy making under the previous President and both Gates and HRC believed that was wrong. Their united front made them a powerful team.

Holbrooke wanted increased troops in Afghanistan to then force the Taliban to negotiate for peace. Obama aides feared getting involved in a war which could cost Obama reeleciton. Holbrooke believed achieving peace would be far better than withdrawing troops from Afghanistan and getting nothing in return.

Biden and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel wanted to reduce troops in Afghanistan. Obama initially approve 21,000 troops and then increased this to 40,000. Negotiations did not become feasible. The State Department became allied with the Defense Department in supporting the war effort. Obama found Holbrooke abrasive.

HRC fundraiser for an American pavilion at the Chinese World Fair, She used some of her contacts, some of whom had also contributed to the Clinton Foundation, such as executives at Microsoft, Yum!, Chevron, General Electric, Honeywell, Intel, Bloomberg, Pepsi, Pfeizer, the National Basketball Association, Dow Cheimcal, Citigroup, Proctor and Gamble, and Sidney Harmon.

HRC seldom fired people and often stood by people forced out for mistakes or other reasons. She and Bill personally thanked P.J. Crowley, the Assistant State Department Secretary for Public Affairs, who stepped down after criticizing the government’s handling of Bradley Manning who had leaked documents to Wikileaks.

HRC fell and broke her elbow. This caused her to miss some foreign relations trips. It also diminished her influence while she was healing.

HRC reviewed policies on same sex marriages for State Department employees. This included housing and medical expense and made travel and evacuation procedures better for same sex couples.

HRC began her day going over news clips, briefing books, and funny cat videos. Aides noted that she read the memos. In her four years as Secretary, she traveled over a million miles.

Jared Cohen of the Planning office observed that Green Movement demonstrators in the Iranian elections would be protesting in Iran and tweeting to the rest of the world during a time when Twitter had planned to shut down for maintenance. Cohen spontaneously convinced Twitter to change its maintenance hours. He did not inform his superiors and did not realize he had violated the policy that the State Department did not intervene in elections. Further, the Green Movement did not want to be seen as supported by Americans. The press found out about what Cohen had done. HRC read the New York Times article on what Cohen did and replied “this is great. This is exactly what we should be doing.”

HRC traveled to war areas of Congo. She had the US provide $17 million in rape prevention and help to women raped by Congolese soldiers.

HRC knew that public criticism of a policy was not a reason to abandon that policy.

HRC avoided discussing domestic policies with anyone other than Obama, Emmanuel, and Deputy White House Chief of Staff Jim Messina. She was useful in advising on people she knew in Congress.

HRC sought to have more effective sanctions against companies doing business with Iran.She negotiated that if Russia and China helped limit Iran’s weapons capabilities that U.S. sanctions would not apply on their companies. HRC knew that unilateral sanctions would be less effective than in getting international help on limiting Iran’s capacities.

HRC negotiated a treaty with Russia where inspectors could inspect their weapons. Most Republican Senators objected to the treaty and it did not appear to have the two thirds of Senators required for ratification. HRC and Biden met with Senators. 71 voted for ratification, four more than the minimum necessary.

Holbrooke died of a heart attack. Holbroke was forceful and at times abrasive. His passing removed a barrier between some Obama and HRC aides.

Protestors in Egypt rose up against their President, Hosni Mubarak. HRC was cautious as Mubarek, which an autocrat, was an ally. The U.S. preferred democracies, yet was leery especially once Mubarek was toppled and the Muslim Brotherhood was elected into power in Egypt.

The rise in demonstrations led to what is called the Arab Spring. Demonstrators led to ousting the government of Tunisia.

HRC urged Middle East leaders to change their own societies before others changed them. She warned that terrorist groups and extremists were appealing to those in poverty. She pledged the U.S. would assist countries that rose to improve their societies.

HRC supported the revolution against Muammar Qaddafi in Libya. She worked with various parties in forming an alliance of the opposition that each could live with. HRC sought to prevent genocide by Qaddafi against the rebels. France and England joined in supporting the revolution. HRC avoided upsetting NATO or the Arab nations. She achieved the use of military force over the objections of Secretary Gates.

Leon Panetta advised HRC of secret intelligence as to the likely whereabouts of Osama bin Laden. Since the information was not certain, Panette feared Obama would hesitate and miss this opportunity to kill bin Laden. HRC joined in urging for action. Admiral Bill McRaven discussed every possible contingency. Biden was worried bin Laden might not be there Gates questioned the raid. HRC favored the raid. Obama agreed to the raid, which was successful in killing bin Laden.

Burma allowed some economic and political reforms. The U.S. lifted some its sanctions against Burma. HRC visited Burma. No U.S. Secretary of States had been to Burma in half a century.

Ambassadpr Gene Cretz in Libya felt “there was no credible threat” and that the Bengazi computer had as much security as did others in conflict areas. Cretz was replaced by Chris Stevens. Stevens requested two Mobile Security Deployment units to remain yet his request was denied and the units were transferred away from Bengazi even though an IED had exploded and created a large hole in the outer wall. Stevens objected to reducing the Bengazi compound from 34 security personnel to 7. The increase in personnel was placed in Tripoli which also saw increased threats. The request for more security personnel for Bengazi was denied by Pat Kennedy, the Undersecretary of State for Management. There is no indication this request went to any more superior than Kennedy.

20 to 125 people attacked the compound with explosives, gunfire, and setting fires. A CIA team arrived yet no before Sean Smith had died and Stevens was missing. Stevens was later found dead. The CIA team held off attackers for several hours until reinforcements arrived. The reinforcements were attacked with five mortar blasts over 90 seconds that killed two CIA contractors.

Susan Rice incorrectly stated the Benghazi conflict was similar to a demonstration that happened the same day in Cairo. HRC stated the attackers were terrorists, which conflicted with Rice’s portrayal. Congressional critics attacked these inconsistencies. Some argued HRC did not act quickly or effectively. The authors note there is little to substantiate those charges and that she responded quickly. On the other side, Sen. Lindsay Graham declared that HRC “got away with murder.”

HRC intended to be Secretary for one term. She declined to serve in Obama’s second term.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Puff Piece for Hillary!, June 16, 2014
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
Another Puff Piece for Hillary. When will someone write from an objective standpoint? Interesting but not as insightful as I had hoped.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars A Hillary Hagiography, April 30, 2014
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
Well-researched, but definitely slanted. How is it possible to write a book with multiple chapters about the Benghazi scandal and not mention Hillary's remark to the murdered men's families that the government would punish the video maker who supposedly provoked the "riot"? At the time she said this (at the ceremony when the coffins were returned), she knew the video had nothing to do with it. And what does her remark, even if she thought the video was involved, say about her views on the First Amendment? I was disappointed in the author's lack of objectivity.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Showing Up is Not All of Life…HRC, July 19, 2014
By 
This review is from: HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton (Hardcover)
If you’re a lover of books, and burdened with the ability to read way too fast, what do you bring on a 17 hour flight from New York City to Ethiopia?
If you’re a political junkie and lover of all things electorate, you pack “HRC” by Jonathan Allen, which documents the time between Hillary’s defeat during the 2008 Democratic primary and selection, and ultimately her political rebirth as Secretary of State in the Obama administration.
I remember reading “Game Change” a couple of years ago and thinking that to have been on the very inside of either the Obama or Clinton campaign would have been both inspirational and disheartening. In order to achieve as much as Hillary Clinton has, it must have been heart-breaking for her to lose in the primary to a young unknown senator from Illinois.
HRC takes the reader through just about every emotion – and brings you inside the campaign ‘war’ rooms and gives detailed accounts of the choices Hillary had to make including her carefully selected words during her concession speech, paving the way for a new relationship with the future President Obama.
If there’s one take away from HRC, it is that Hillary tried, at all times, to be fully aware of the mistakes her presidential campaign made and has worked diligently since 2008 to reinvent herself – something she has done many times over the years, each time rising higher than her fans and adversaries believed possible.
Jonathan Allen does a wonderful job of bringing you inside the White House and foreign affairs offices around the world and shows you a woman who is powerful and smart enough to know that as a woman, her strength has to be countered by self-deprecation and humor. I recommend this book to anyone interested in learning more about the 2008 election and the woman who one day may be known as our first female president.
This was my first selection from the many wonderful books available on Blogging for Books and as a note to anyone reading this review: "I received this book for free from Blogging for Books for this review."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting book about Clinton but Authors are very repetitive, July 15, 2014
By 
This review is from: HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton (Hardcover)
I really like books about politics, and I'm disposed towards liking Clinton. With that said, I had a tough time getting through this book. The authors sounded one note again and again and again. To them, everything that Hillary Clinton does - take a position as Secretary of State, go to dinner with someone, take a walk, say good morning - inevitably and without doubt is tied to her desire to be president. It got pretty old pretty quickly. I get it - she's ambitious, and she would like to be President. That does not mean that everything she does, says or experiences is related to that desire on her part. She's also a public servant, a caring person and someone with multiple motives and desires (like all of us). Sometimes she does things that don't tie back to that.

Just one example - in talking about the unequivocal success that Clinton had in bringing Burma back into the world community, the authors just couldn't resist tying it to her presidential ambitions - even on the thinnest of reeds, based on what someone else said! The authors write : "That week NBC's Ann Curry asked Sun Kyi if she would rule out running for president of her country [Burma], and Suu Kyi responded with an answer that could have served as an insight into Hillary's thinking. 'No, she said, if you're a politician, you never rule out such a possibility." (page 328) Really? A burmese leader makes a statement about domestic politics in Burma and to the authors HAVE to use it to talk, again, about HRC's presidential ambitions? Seemed like the 999th time they had said something like that.

With that said I learned a lot about HRC, and her relationship with Obama, and Bill Clinton's relationship with Obama. I enjoyed the book and it had some good insights about her. Worth a read if you are a political junkie.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 211 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

Details

HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton
HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton by Jonathan Allen (Hardcover - February 11, 2014)
$26.00 $19.18
In Stock
Add to cart Add to wishlist
Search these reviews only
Rate and Discover Movies
Send us feedback How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you? Let us know here.