Customer Reviews

Sccoby Doo And The Halloween (Turtleback School & Library Binding Edition) (Scooby-Doo)

5 star:		(5)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

My son is an avid reader of all Scooby-Doo books. He loves this book. We have spent many nights with this book and a flashlight. My son loves to read the page and then turn out the flashlight to reveal the glow-in-the-dark parts of the page. The plot of the book revolves around a ghost that haunts a popular hotel. Scooby-Doo and the gang try to figure out who it is.

My 3 year old picked out this book in a store. I was a bit skeptical about just how this glow-in-the-dark technique would work and there was no way to find out until we brought it home to try it out.

Sitting in a dark bedroom, armed with a latern, we discovered it works wonderfully.

We read each page with only a latern as a light source. The text on each page was just long enough to allow the glow-in-the-dark figure or clue to "charge." Then, when we turned out the light, a glowing image appeared.

This glow-in-the-dark book works great and is a favorite bedtime book.

We are now searching for other books with this same concept.

Grab your flashlight and try it.

This book is an excellent bedtime read for both the child and the adult. Be sure to use a flashlight to fully illuminate each page. Can't wait for the next installment with this type of Glow In The Dark action. Very fun!

When my brother was younger he had this book. My first year of teaching kindergarten he donated it to my classroom library. This is one of the very rare books that is always checked out. In fact they fight over it. Anything that makes my students want to read that much is a great book!

When my daughter was three years old, she loved this book. Although she knows where all the hidden spooks are, she still loves the process of reading the story and turning out the light to see the spook.

Because this "gimick" makes the book more like a Scooby cartoon, this is the best Scooby book to date. And we have a bunch!

This novel has a quality of grabbing at the reader with its serials-style suspense plots and cliffhangers. It is intricately constructed; in fact, the author appears to have been so enamored of complexity in intertwined plots that he makes the reading labored at some points, the characters suffer from lack of dimensionality, and the narrative suffers from repeated structure, especially with the continuing trials and tribulations set forth by kidnappers and assassins.

Mccann clearly has researched history and literature in attempting to reconstruct a gothic sensation novel. He provides almost an excess of period detail and the setting seems to take precedence over character development. The protagonist clearly suffers within a web of intrigue but for all his speculation and effort the reader does not "get into" his feelings as much as his thoughts. The villains are hateful and approach a "mustache-twirling" quality. The remaining characters are vague and ill-defined, perhaps victims of the author's intention to have virtually everyone in the book a suspect for wrong-doing. The most serious consequence of this character vagueness is that the resolution of the last peril episode is inadequately explained, for it hinges on a critical change in attitude by one of the major players. The author's cleverness becomes problematic too when, in his sweeping attempt to make this epic cover many years and locales, the plethora of characters are called at some times by their first names, at others by their last names, at still others by nicknames, and some even have assumed monickers in addition! The mystery thus takes on a confusing and frustrating quality.

The perils that befall the protagonists have the feel of serials publishing like Dickens and filmed entertainment like Saturday matinees and soap operas. By sheer number the adventures become repetitious and at times strain credibility. Also, particularly in the second quarter of the book, the perils were so sordid and revolting that I felt a sadist for continuing to read. Mccann provides occasional relief from this when he has Scooby make mention of a future thought, reassuring that the current nightmare is survived. Of course, the ultimate fate of the main character (Scooby Doo) is ensured by the narrative structure of the book (first person) and so it is the supporting characters (Shaggy, Scrappy, Velma, Freddy, et al.) for whom we must be most uncertain and fearful, to the extent that our emotional investment allows. I felt the book resolved the mysteries and the events came together in the last few pages in a most satisfying way, with characters behaving with the ambivalence and uncertainty one would expect after such torturous experiences. This novel is absolutely a tour de force in research, plotting, pace, and intricacy. Its weaknesses in character development and human insight prevent it from achieving the depth of a Dickens or Bronte novel. It is more on a par, perhaps, with a Radcliffe.

To my 7 year old and I, the device of "seeing the ghosts" detracted from the storyline immensely. The storyline was very poor in comparison to the rest of Mr. McLeon's books. Also, we could feel the invisible ghosts on the pages, but couldn't see them.