|Amazon Price||New from||Used from|
The following is an excerpt from a Q&A with Dr. Sacks published on Omnivoracious, the Amazon Books blog. Click here to read the full interview.
Mia Lipman: In Hallucinations, you mention that your childhood migraines are one of the reasons you became a neurologist. How did they help shape your path?
Dr. Sacks: My experiences go back to my first memories of when I was three or four, suddenly seeing a brilliant zigzag which seemed to be vibrating, then enlarged and covered everything to one side. This has happened innumerable times since, but that first time was very terrifying…I know I was in the garden, and part of the garden wall seemed to disappear, and I asked my mother about it. She too had classical migraines, so she explained what it was about and said that it was benign and it would only last a few minutes, and I'd be none the worse. So though I'm not in love with the attacks, it's nice to know that one can live with this quite well.
So that early experience made you curious about why this was happening to you?
Indeed, and there were other experiences. Sometimes it was just color, perhaps in one half of the visual field, or things would be frozen and I couldn't see any movement. So I think this gave me a very early feeling that it's only the privilege of a normal brain which allows us to see the way we do—and that what seems to be a simple vision in fact must have dozens of different components, and any one of these can go down. So it was a learning experience for me as well.
Speaking of learning experiences, you talk in the book about a period in your 30s when you did a lot of hallucinogenic drugs—
Ah, I thought that would come up. [Laughing.]
Of course, it's the best part! I especially liked your description of the results as "a mix of the neurological and the divine." What did this self-experimentation teach you about your field, as well as personally?
I can't conceal that my motives were sort of mixed, but these were learning experiences as well as recreational ones, and occasionally terrifying ones. The gain, I think, [is that] it's a way of revealing various capacities and incapacities in the brain, including, perhaps, mystical ones…I quote William James, who, after taking nitrous oxide, said that it showed him there were many forms of consciousness other than rational consciousness, and that these seem to be uncovered one by one. And that's quite an experience. I do not recommend it to anybody, and I hope my writing about these things is not seen as a recommendation. I think I'm very lucky to have survived them, which several of my friends and contemporaries didn't.
Very insightful writings if one wishes to understand Voices and Hallucinations and how the mind creates such. Read morePublished 12 days ago by Harold T. Billiodeaux
I'm probably one of the few that could have done without Sacks taking us down memory lane filled with recollections of his assorted drug trips. Read morePublished 23 days ago by Stuart Hinds
The author's research on all the senses that have been fooled in so many people is most interesting. so many anecdotes so many different hallucinations. Read morePublished 26 days ago by artie solomon
All of Dr. Sacks' writings respect the patient and the field of study, and are written for the normally intelligent layperson. Some scientists are communicators!Published 1 month ago by unsworthyeti
No real insight or original thoughts. More of an autobiography about the authors drug use and medical issues than of real science. Read morePublished 1 month ago by joshua bremer
I have read a few Oliver Sacks books. He is certainly a competent writer. But he is a neurologist and not a psychiatrist. Read morePublished 1 month ago by Kenneth J. Garcia