5 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A complex novel of a complex time, April 5, 2000
This review is from: Hard Rain (Paperback)
Dorfman has had the misfortune of prefiguring history in a number of his literary works. His first novel Hard Rain (1973) was released as the warning signs of an impending coup were blaring over the Chilean people. The text is composed of a number of fragments - of literature dealing with the socialist revolution in Chile, of reviews of such literature, of film scripts, of criticism of the novel itself, and of extensive correspondence between authors, publishers and editors. The pieces are largely disconnected and comment in highly oblique ways on the relationship between aesthetics and politics. They are able to create a whirlwind of artistic and critical voices at the same time that they unite in a metacommentary on the historical moment Dorfman was narrating in Chile. The most disturbing aspect of the text is the fact that it highlights antagonisms and questions the strength of Chilean solidarity, before the coup and at a moment when Dorfman himself was highly committed to the success of Allende's government. Many of his colleagues would later chastise him for his seeming lack of support, while Dorfman would protest that the grim world of Hard Rain was a fictional exploration of disharmony. This novel manages to explain the complexity of Chile at the time while it also debates questions about literary aesthetics and the importance of art.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3.0 out of 5 stars
The promise of a literary renaissance cut short, February 18, 2004
Few readers would accuse this book of being a "novel" in any traditional sense of its literary meaning. Instead, it is a paragon of whatever might be meant by "experimental fiction": a collection of fabricated book reviews, encyclopedia entries, film proposals, term papers. There are no recurring characters, no plot, and no storyline. This smorgasbord of literary summaries, all without transition or explanation, signifies the debate over the limitless artistic opportunities presented by the potential--and the fragility--of the democratic revolution in Chile in the early 1970s.
Dorfman wants to convey the heady diversity that confronted authors under the Allende government: "They are a collective entity, a society of artists that will be able to drain every last drop of what the country is going through, every story, nothing will get away from them." Although he wrote this book before the Pinochet coup, Dorfman presciently hints at the frailty of the revolution: "a lot of good it'd do us to have a literary renaissance if we ended up without a country."
The result may be, as the author insists in a fictional interview embedded in the book, "a mosaic of Chile, a sample of what had remained outside the book," but, in fact, the postmodern deliberation eventually drowns out any "attempt" to tell a story. Initially, the reviews and summaries are fairly straightforward; some of the discussions (and the fictional books being discussed) are really quite fascinating, and the diligent reader will be rewarded by rich humor and keen insights. About halfway through, however, the segments and summaries begin interrupting each other and what's being said is entirely subsumed by how it's being said: the form of the debate itself crowds out both the message and the arguments. At a certain point, readers are bound to get "the point," and then the book begins to try one's patience.
A short yet laborious read, and often teetering on the edge of overkill, it all would have probably worked better without so many jump-cuts and with a little less self-indulgence. In the end, though, a sense of sadness pervades "Hard Rain," since the reader knows (and the author did not) what comes after the deluge.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No