Like his original hearers many people today find Jesus' sayings hard. Some sayings are hard because they are difficult to understand, others because the demands they make on us are only too clear. F. F. Bruce examines seventy of the hard sayings of Jesus to clear away the cultural and historical difficulties which keep us from grappling with the real challenge of Jesus' message. Evident in each chapter is Bruce's keen evangelical scholarship and pastoral insight.
Hard Sayings of Jesus
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle.
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
F. F. Bruce (1910-1990) was Rylands Professor of Biblical Criticism and Exegesis at the University of Manchester in England. During his distinguished career, he wrote more than forty bestselling commentaries and books, including several titles published by InterVarsity Press, A Mind for What Matters and Paul, Apostle of the Heart Set Free. He also served as general editor of The New International Commentary on the New Testament.
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
22 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Hard Sayings - Easy Reading,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Hard Sayings of Jesus (Jesus Library) (Paperback)
I would recommend this book to anyone. It would be useful for the layperson who has question or the Sunday School teacher preparing a lesson or a pator or even a seminary student. Bruce takes many of the hardest sayings of Christ and gives a good interpertaion in just a few pages. If you want in depth coverage of a text then look somewhere else, but if you want a quick overview and solid answer this is the book to do it. If nothing else its a good reference book to have on your self, especially since its so affordable.
17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An excellent book to determine personal dedication to Christ.,
By
This review is from: Hard Sayings of Jesus (Jesus Library) (Paperback)
I have used this book as the basis for more than one study on personal commitment to Christ. This is where "the rubber meets the road." Are you willing to accept Jesus' way of living, or are you content to offer him lip service and slog along in the muck of worldliness? As Bruce says, "Any attempt to soften the meaning of Christ's words is probably wrong" (my paraphrase). My only problem with the book is that it brings me up against myself,...and I am often found wanting.
18 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Extremely enjoyable, if not flawed, book,
By In the beginning... (Ohio, USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Hard Sayings of Jesus (Jesus Library) (Paperback)
"The Hard Sayings of Jesus" is a well written & edited volume that is an enjoyable, if not slightly flawed, book. It is a nice gateway to begin the journey into the more difficult teachings of Jesus, from those with confusing meanings due to linguistic, historical, and cultural barriers to those with all to clear of meanings that challenge our own comforts.
While Jesus and his teachings are the focal point of the New Testament it must be noted with a touch of irony that the sayings of Jesus are not only the most challenging texts to follow as a disciple but can also be the most difficult ones to properly interpret. "The Hard Sayings of Jesus" by the late F.F. Bruce addresses both of these issues by introducing the reader to a host of problematic passages, providing a concise survey of the major points of debate, and then offers his best suggestion(s) to resolve the issue(s). The format of the book is excellent and engaging, selecting 70 sayings almost exclusively from the Synoptic Gospels in roughly chronological order. The chapters average about three and a half pages so they are quite digestible, leaving you time to ponder and debate what you just read or squeeze in one... or two or three!... more chapters. Between the breadth of knowledge Bruce brings into his surveys, the intrigue of the sayings of Jesus, and the format of the book I found this short tome difficult to put down. The strength of the book is Bruce did an ample job of surveying the most commonly acknowledged difficult or divisive sayings and concisely touches on a number of issues surrounding the saying before offering his own take on the issue--which are frequently quite good. While the format of the book is to be praised it would have been helpful to the reader if each chapter ended with a bibliography of current research to continue further study. While it is unfair to demerit the excellent format of the volume the audience, which seems to be aimed at serious Bible students and undergraduate Seminarians, would have benefited significantly if the volume was presented as a gateway to deeper study. Bruce is obviously well versed in all the relevant material and is a master on the topic, an extended bibliography for further study would have been an excellent addition. As it stands, the current volume finds itself as a meager gateway to engaging the topics at a superficial level and left to hunt down the relevant works in other resources. The target audience is confusing. Above I noted that it appears to be aimed at serious students of the Bible and undergraduate Bible students. Bruce does not hesitate to dialogue on issues like Gospel Source Theories (Q and the like), reference the Aramaic background of Jesus' sayings, and [infrequently] engage liberal-critical scholarship about the "originality" of certain sayings. Yet, due to the format, this is all done at a fairly superficial level--which is begging for thorough documentation. Yet the current format is a dead end in this regards, leaving the reader no direct way to further engage these issues. Furthermore, the book contains very little Greek which is surprising considering the audience and the helpfulness it could offer at times. Instead the reader is typically treated to arguments like, "The AV says... but the RSV renders better". Considering the audience it would have been worthwhile to dig directly into the Greek of the sayings. Those caveats noted, the book still remains accessible to the lay reader. While some concepts may be foreign and readers will have to take Bruce at his word, the writing is excellent and Bruce does a nice job of presenting ideas without assuming the reader will be formally acquainted with such concepts. Which leads me to some of my major grinds with this book. In many ways I feel the book should be re-titled, "A Modern Christian Perspective on the Difficult Sayings of Jesus". The book dabbles just enough in difficult ideas -- Jesus spoke Aramaic, logia and source theory, Jewish background of the sayings, critical assessment of the originality of sayings -- without thoroughly engaging these issues when they not only offer significant contributions to the topic of discussion but also are deserving of a more thorough response and interaction. While a more thorough bibliography would have alleviated this issue, the current form of the book feels like a treaty aimed to engage these issues just enough to bypass them on the way to the conclusion. This is a disservice to the reader as they come away with the impression that these issues are resolved and have been adequately been addressed. I applaud Bruce for broaching these topics, but the current format doesn't lend itself to a very balanced treatment of every saying. This leads further into the one area I found significantly lacking in this volume: The Jewishness of Jesus. Jesus was born a Jew and lived a Jewish life. He is well acquainted not only with the Hebrew Bible but the Jewish teachings of his day -- of which he interacts with regularly and form and central theme in his conflicts with the Jewish sects of his time. Authors like Brad Young, E.P. Sanders, David Flussner, and David Daube among others have penned significant contributions in this field of study over the last four decades yet this volume only lightly engages these issues. This is not to say Bruce completely ignores this area of study, but I found the treatment in this volume completely lacking. Part of the difficulty found in Jesus' sayings is they are part of an inner-household conflict. Without fully understanding the positions Jesus disagreed with, and notably the many issues he agreed with his contemporaries, the reader isn't given a full appreciation of the thoroughness of Jesus' teachings. This is a significant aspect of understanding Jesus in his historical perspective: Jesus the Jew, not Jesus the Christian. An example to illustrate this point is found in chapter 8 (Matthew 5:17ff) where the difficulty isn't with the saying, but with Christian theology and Pauline interpretation (p.42). Unfortunately Bruce mischaracterizes Jesus relationship to Rabbinic teachings (p.44) when he says, "It is plain that Jesus did not accept the Rabbinical interpretation of the law. Indeed, he charged the scribes, the acknowledged students and teachers of the law, with 'transgressing the commandment of God for the sake of their tradition'". This is followed by a reference to Matthew 15:2 and Matthew 24:4. While this typecasting fits quite well with traditional Christian views of Jesus and his conflict with his contemporaries, it is quite out of place with the historical Jesus. Ironically, the context of the passages in which Bruce is commenting (Matthew chapters 5-7, the Sermon on the Mount) are full of teachings that are paralleled in Rabbinic literature. Chapter 5 Brad Young's recent book, "Meet the Rabbis" is dedicated to the parallels in the Sermon on the Mount. While no one would argue that Jesus agreed with the Rabbis on every point, it is inaccurate to say that Jesus diverged radically with Rabbinical interpretation of the Law. For the same Jesus who sharply criticizes the Pharisees is also found engaging them in dialogue frequently, expressing common teachings found about the Rabbis, and even saying, "The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat. So you must obey them and do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach" (Matthew 23:2f). Of course, back the chapter 8 of the book, Bruce uses his general argument to put Jesus against the Jews and the Law, ethical versus ceremonial, and dismissing the "least of the commandments" on the basis of, "I desire mercy, not sacrifice". Yet was it not Jesus who said, "Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices-- mint, dill and cummin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law-- justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former" (Matthew 23:23). Jesus is a complex person and his teachings, like those on the Law above, aren't always concisely identified as either/or. As in the above example (truly, "Jesus and the Law" is a topic unto itself) Bruce's approach is outmoded and inaccurate. His initial frustration isn't with Jesus, but with his understanding of Paul, and gravitates towards Jesus tension with the religious leaders of his time, and not the law himself. His dismissal of Jesus connection with the Judaism of his time is quite flippant (and incorrect), and his approach to the issue is cast in traditional Christian apology and "either/or" rhetoric. The difficult say of Jesus wasn't addressed in its proper historical setting but instead sidestepped with traditional Christian dogma. On rare occasion Bruce's discussion boarders on the absurd. Chapter 10, "Adultery in the Heart" (Matt 5:28) is an example where Bruce overreaches in his conclusion (to score political correctness points?). Bruce is correct in using this as an example of where Jesus looks "inward" to intensify the demands of the Law, and he dutifully notes that the 10th commandment broaches the topic of coveting/desire of another person's spouse in the broader sense (Job 31:1 covers the lust of the eyes as well). But the conclusion, where he references the Pope with the provocative suggestion that one can commit adultery with ones own wife is laughable. While few would disagree with his point about treating women as sex objects (and Jesus did have an elevated and respectful view of women compared to society), the emphasis Bruce places on "woman" misses the point that the word Jesus chooses in "adultery" (instead of fornication or another word of the like) is defined as relations with the spouse of another... Read more ›
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
So You'd Like to...
|
|
