Product Details

• Actors: Sharon Gless, Kevin Dobson, Raymond Serra, Charlie Aiken, Elva Josephson
• Directors: Lee Philips
• Format: NTSC
• Rated: NR (Not Rated)
• Number of tapes: 1
• Studio: Lightning Video
• VHS Release Date: January 1, 2002
• Run Time: 96 minutes
• Average Customer Review: 3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
• ASIN: 6300179001
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #281,324 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars . . . Sharon Gless & Kevin Dobson shine . . ., June 20, 2002

By 

Vintage TV Fan "sunsheyes" (Los Angeles, CA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Hardhat & Legs [VHS] (VHS Tape)

in this beautifully written romantic comedy . . . one not to be missed & sure to be enjoyed!

0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Very honest and upfront seller - tells it like it is, April 24, 2011

By 

Chicago1 - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Hardhat & Legs [VHS] (VHS Tape)

When I was viewing this item on line the description clearly stated that it was not a new copy and had some distortion or such from use. So, I knew that going in and had no issues when I received it. It wasn't the greatest - but that was ok. I appreciate the honesty and will look to buy more in the future from this seller as I know I can trust them. Would recommend to others.

0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Hard Hat and Legs VHS, January 21, 2011

By 

harylock - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Hardhat & Legs [VHS] (VHS Tape)

This item was described as "Very Good". No mention was made that it had been from a video rental business. If that HAD been mentioned, I would not have ordered it. In short, the sellers use of "Very Good" is in my opinion a gross distortion of the truth. The Video has a lot of hash at times and the picture jumps and waves. It is a good thing that it was not very costly, but I strongly disagree with its representation as "Very Good". My criticism is not of the movie, which I enjoyed in spite of the condition of it, but of the vendor and its misleading description.