Product Details

• Actors: Andie MacDowell, Scott Anton, Elias Koteas, Brendan Gleeson, Adrien Brody
• Directors: Élie Chouraqui
• Writers: Élie Chouraqui, Didier Le Pêcheur, Isabel Ellsen, Michael Katims
• Producers: Albert Cohen, Artemio Benki, Inigo Lezzi
• Format: Closed-captioned, Color, DVD, Widescreen, NTSC
• Language: English, French, Serbo-Croatian
• Region: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only. Read more about DVD formats.)
  
• Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
• Number of discs: 1
• Rated: R (Restricted)
• Studio: Lions Gate
• DVD Release Date: June 19, 2007
• Run Time: 121 minutes
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (45 customer reviews)
• ASIN: B000OY9V8Y
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #66,655 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
• For more information about "Harrison's Flowers" visit the Internet Movie Database (IMDb)

Editorial Reviews

HARRISONS FLOWERS - DVD Movie

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

33 of 36 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars This Film Tells the Truth About War, January 23, 2004

By 

John Harrison (Potomac, Md. USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Harrison's Flowers (DVD)

I watched this movie for two reasons: I like Andie MacDowell and my last name is Harrison.

I liked this movie because I am a Viet nam vet that fought in Tet and therefore I have some considerable experience with war in a city, or as the Army used to call it War in a Built Up Area. If you have actually seen this kind of war, the movie is frighteningly accurate and like war, necessisarily fragmentary and incomplete.

For example, in one perfect and horrific, scene Andie MacDowell and her two journalist companions are moving through a city to find a hospital where her husband may be. They come upon a situation: a young child, probably a girl runs out of a building in front of them. A soldier follows her out of the building, and kills her. War's brutality? Certainly. A killing mad soldier, killing an innocent child. Possibly. But, even more likely, the scene represents wars brutality on multiple levels. If you knew that the child had just thrown a hand grenade and the soldier escaped it but his buddy, or even more likely in this kind of war, his actual brother did not would that change the nature of the scene for you? Or, if that was true and you knew that the child had another hand grenade, or a pistol, would that change your impression of the meaning of the scene? And how about that soldier many years later as he looks down at his own child, assuming he survives the war, will he be able to forget the look on that other chid's face as he shot her? However good his reason and in real war there are many reasons that can make such an act necessary, will he be able to forget, or will it haunt him. This kind of awful situation, but not unusual situation, is precisely why William T. Sherman said that "War is Hell." For a soldier, having killed a child for any reason must be true Hell, but to have done it on purpose. That would be worse. While I avoided shooting at children, the reality of war among civilians is worse than you could ever imagine even in a nightmare. Say you are a sentry and there is a car speeding toward your post. You open fire. The car stops. Your post is safe. But it turns out that a child is dead. The car was speeding to get to the hospital. That is war in the city and all you have is an instant to make up your mind to shoot, or not to shoot. To kill, or not to kill, and either way to live with the aftermath.

Do the sailors or Marines on watch on the USS Cole wished that they had fired. Even if their orders were not to fire. Even if the approach of the boat with a bomb in it did not look like an attack. Even if a child had been steering the boat with a bomb. I have no doubt that they all wished that they had fired. And they will wish that, and relive that, until they too die. In that sense they are as much causalities of war as their shipmates that suffered actual physical hurt. The Captain of that ship, the Officer of the Day, the Watch officer all will relive and replay that day and regret that no one fired soon or often enough. Watch this movie and you will see what I mean. There are things that happen in war that are horrible, to everybody.

I have seen war and I have seen many war movies - but only rarely have I seen a movie as true to the appalling core of the experience as this is. As our soldiers fight a shadow war in Iraq and in Afghanistan it would be good to remember that war is hell. If you have forgotten, this is a very accurate picture of it.

Yes, the plot is a tad implausible, but I would hope that the wife that my son chooses when he grows up would do as Andie MacDowell's fictional character does and fight to find out what happened to him. I know my wife would.

12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Feels a bit distanced from emotional connectivity., March 20, 2002

By 

D. Litton (Wilmington, NC) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

"I would have felt something break inside if he were dead," sobs Sarah Lloyd after learning that her photo journalist husband has been killed on duty in Yugoslavia. Set in 1991, during a time of civil war, "Harrison's Flowers" is a somewhat murky exploration of human strength in times of distress, tacking a well-constructed production design to an emotionally mute story line that has its moments, and manages to keep one's interest for a reasonable portion of its lengthy duration.

Andie MacDowell plays Sarah, whose husband, Harrison (David Strathairn), is a Pulitzer-winning photographer who shoots various images for Newsweek, Life, and Time magazines. Oh, and he likes to keep up the flowers in his greenhouse, too, in case we should think he's all about work and no play. After deciding he's had enough of traveling to war-torn countries to take poignant snapshots, his boss convinces him to take one last job in Yugoslavia, where a civil war is breaking out.

Sarah is supportive in his decision to go, like any good-natured wife would be. Her support turns to disbelief when she walks into work one morning and becomes the center of silent attention, which can only mean one thing: Harrison is dead. There's only one catch: no one saw his body being removed from the collapsed house that supposedly took his life. Sarah, in what we first believe is a deep sense of denial, sees an image of a shattered greenhouse on CNN, spots a man whom she believes is Harrison, and heads to Yugoslavia to find him herself.

So far, we've been given a so-so setup with a couple of meandering moments and throwaway subplots crossed with one or two important ones. The Lloyd's young son, Cesar, harbors a silent resistance for his father as a result of his absence, but it is never expanded upon, and never comes into play as it should. The whole greenhouse and flower connection is corny, but without it, there would be no basis for the movie's equally corny title. A beginning scene at the Pulitzer awards introduces Adrian Brody as a photo journalist who lashes out at Harrison in angst over his less-accomplished friend's death; later, out of guilt, he helps Sarah make it safely through enemy territory.

The second half of the movie places us in the rugged terrain of Yugoslavia, where members of the press and television camera crews make their way through battle by driving in cars marked with the letters "TV." Your acceptance of these scenes depends on how much of your disbelief you are willing to suspend, from scenes like a near-rape involving Sarah and several enemy soldiers (but from which side of the fighting?), to their many near-misses and close calls with dropping bombs and sniper bullets.

The film gets the look of war right, with settings and ramshackle towns ravished by the effects of continuous firepower that look authentic and realistically haunting. Yet, however real they may look, the war scenes lack the effectiveness of such films as "We Were Soldiers" or "Black Hawk Down," mainly because we know that our small group of reporters is going to survive no matter what stands in their way.

In a solid performance, MacDowell makes a good, but not entirely lasting impression as a wife and mother torn between disbelief and reality. Her character's interactions with those touched by war is not as prevalent as is needed to get a feel for the emotional taxation of such traumatic events, but she does try. The overall movie feels a bit distanced from any sort of emotional connectivity, but it does have redeeming qualities as a time-waster without much afterthought to it.

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars What CNN missed . . ., March 3, 2008

By 

Ronald Scheer "rockysquirrel" (Los Angeles) - See all my reviews
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Harrison's Flowers (DVD)

This 2-hour French production with an American cast is an odd combination of a blithely impossible action plot played against a chilling reality. When a world-famous photographer is reported killed in the war-torn former Yugoslavia, his wife flies off from their comfortable home in Westchester to find him and bring him back alive. The best that can be said about this Hollywood-style storyline is that it provides a reason to accomplish something very different - to portray the ghastly truth of ethnic warfare as it took place in the Balkans in the early 1990s and the role of news photographers who risked their lives to capture it with their cameras.

Plunged into Croatia as Vukovar was being overrun by Serbs, the characters take the audience into a hell where everyone - men, women, children - must kill or be killed. We are witness to atrocities and inhumanities that take the breath away. While war in the movies has often been played for thrill-packed adventure - even anti-war films - this one leaves you with a sense of powerlessness in the face of unimaginable horror. Urban warfare and ethnic cleansing cease being abstract concepts. We see their portrayal with our own eyes, and the efforts of one American woman to retrieve her husband in the midst of it all are dwarfed by comparison. Worth seeing anyway for what CNN missed.