| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Journal of Religious History
"Oberman has used all the skills of a specialist to present to us a form of medieval theology which is of great relevance for all theologians."
-Theology Today
"Meticulous historical research, the broad horizon of great historiography, and penetrating elucidation of difficult philosophical and theological problems make it one of the outstanding works in the field of history of Christian thought."
-The Reformed Theological Review
"A massive book for which all students of the later Middle Ages and the Reformation will be grateful."
-Journal of Theological Studies
First printed in 1963, The Harvest of Medieval Theology remains a standard for students of late medieval theology. Herein, Oberman explains the theology and philosophy of late medieval nominalism through a detailed analysis of the writings of Gabriel Biel, the famous German disciple of William Ockham. The book discusses all the themes of Biel's thought: the dialectic of the two powers of God, grace, predestination, justification, Christology, Mariology, eucharist, and mysticism. Because Biel is believed to have had a profound influence on the young Martin Luther, Oberman's book is as important for Reformation scholars as it is for medievalists.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The root of 'Faith Alone' was a movement called Modernism, oh, sorry, 'Nominalism',
By Steve S. Jones (Wisconsin, USA) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Harvest of Medieval Theology, The: Gabriel Biel and Late Medieval Nominalism (Paperback)
Heiko Oberman is one of the top Lutheran scholars to ever live. His research is impeccable. Yet, one can't get around the fact that he is an apologist for Modernism (nominalism). And this is where his work always falters. Fair enough, one should figure this by the title, but he always gets his sides mixed up - will the real Modernists please stand up? (But you'd have to read another book of his on Luther to fully appreciate that) I also have a sneaking suspicion that this is a veiled rebuttal to Damascene's 'Fount of Knowledge'. If it is, then he should be up front about it. It's a bit of philosophical dishonesty to portray the Modernists as the true Traditionalists without fairly representing someone who is actually from Tradition.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|