Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 220 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Sep 14, 2012 4:35:07 AM PDT
gginnc says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Sep 14, 2012 5:09:48 AM PDT
Dalekmaster says:
"Just like Jimmy, he has enabled the Muslims and made a disillusioned effort to be everyone's friend."

Yes, how dare he actually try to get along with people instead of just bombing everyone into submission like any real American would.

Dolt.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 5:26:41 AM PDT
gginnc says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 6:35:06 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
Gee and George W. Bush encouraged Muslims to settle in the country by giving Asylum to Iraqis.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 6:36:07 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
Yeah as successful as ignoring Bin laden and 9/11 happening... oh yeah wrong president.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 6:44:41 AM PDT
Dalekmaster says:
"His efforts to be 'friends' have been very successful--maroon."

You mean like how Bush II tried being "friends" with Osama bin Laden by ignoring all the pre-9/11 intelligence warnings?

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 6:52:13 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
Well the bush family and the bin laden family were pretty tight.

Posted on Sep 14, 2012 7:08:31 AM PDT
Brian Curtis says:
Very good, GG! You've learned to avoid mentioning anything factual that could be checked. Now you're settling in to how a real Obama-hater operates.

Of course, you slipped up when you mentioned being friendly to Muslims as if that were some sort of crime... but don't worry, we've dealt with bigotry before. It's common among delusional wingnuts.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 7:17:31 AM PDT
gginnc says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 7:20:20 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
There has been no policy of appeasement. You're confusing him with Ronald Reagan.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 7:21:30 AM PDT
gginnc says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 7:26:22 AM PDT
Dalekmaster says:
"Are you off your meds ??"

Have you conveniently forgotten how Reagan shipped weapons to Iran? Sounds like appeasement to me. Filthy traitor.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 7:28:11 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
Who was it that cut and run from Beirut?

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 7:29:13 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
Let's not forget we played both sides not only were we shipping weapons to Iran but also chemical weapons to Saddam in Iraq. Then we were funding the contra terrorists.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 7:33:57 AM PDT
Dalekmaster says:
"Let's not forget we played both sides not only were we shipping weapons to Iran but also chemical weapons to Saddam in Iraq."

And he used them against his own people too. But we were just fine with that because he was our man in Baghdad at the time.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 7:35:29 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
Then we told the Kurds if they stood up to Saddam we'd help them and when they did we looked the other way.

Posted on Sep 14, 2012 10:22:55 AM PDT
Jimmy E. says:
Just as long as President Obama doesn't become Ronald Reagan II or George W. Bush II, I'll be happy. I have no problem with him being Jimmy Carter II in relation to the Arab world.

On April 18, 1983, terrorists from Hezbollah, funded by Iran bombed the US Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon killing 63 embassy employees, including 17 Americans both civilian employees and military personnel. President Reagan did nothing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_United_States_embassy_bombing

On October 23, 1983, the Islamic Jihad terrorist organization, funded by Iran, bombed the US Marine Corps barracks in Beirut, Lebanon killing 241 people including 220 United States Marines, 18 US Navy sailors and 3 US Army soldiers.
The Reagan Administration response was to move US military forces off land and onto US ships in the Mediterranean Sea after the terrorist attack.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_United_States_embassy_bombing

The US also sued Iran and finally in July 2012, federal Judge Royce Lamberth ordered Iran to pay more than $813m in damages and interest to the families of the 241 US soldiers that were killed, writing in a ruling that Tehran had to be "punished to the fullest extent legally possible... Iran is racking up quite a bill from its sponsorship of terrorism."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beirut_barracks_bombing

In spite of Iran's sponsorship of terrorism that killed close to 300 Americans, in 1985 the Reagan Administration was caught selling US Hawk and TOW missiles to the terrorist nation of Iran under the Ayatollah Kohmeine in the Iran-Contra scandal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Contra

Here's George W. Bush kissing the King of Saudi Arabia:
http://www.pissedonpolitics.com/BushPrinceKiss.jpg

Here's George W. Bush holding hands with the King of Saudi Arabia:
http://www.bigmattress.com/weblog/images/Bush%20urges%20Saudis.jpg

Here's George W. Bush dancing the Arab Sword Dance with the Royal Princes of Saudi Arabia
http://blog.c77c.net/photos/bushhhh_1.jpg
And here's the You Tube video of President George W.Bush doing the Islamic Sword Dance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoRHLrXmqbc

And finally, here's President George W. Bush with one of his closest personal friends, Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, who when this photo was taken down on the Bush Ranch in Crawford, Texas was the Saudi Oil Minister.

Prince Bandar has now moved on from oil to be the head of the Saudi version of the CIA, Director General of the Saudi Intelligence Agency.
http://ph.cdn.photos.upi.com/topic_photo/Prince_Bandar_bin_Sultan/c2e7a4f191ffc659aaa3d92eecac0a84/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandar_bin_Sultan

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 11:14:17 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
Let's also not forget that it was Carter who used the republicans gung ho policy and launched a military mission to try to free the hostages. Reagan traded weapons to get the hostages out.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 11:34:00 AM PDT
gginnc says:
Mr. Gonzales'
Wasn't Slick Willy offered UBL several times and refused ? Didn't Willy prohibit, to protect himself, communications between the CIA and FBI? Don't want those inconvenient Chinese bribes coming up again, do we ?

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 11:34:45 AM PDT
gginnc says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 11:40:30 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
Nope he was never offered Osama Bin Laden. A fox news contributor Mansoor Ijaz made up the story and was considered not credible by the NSA. Sudan never had Bin laden and the government never made the offer. No Clinton didn't prohibit communication between the CIA and FBI. Those communications were in place since the Nixon years. Non-existent chinese bribes. So you're 0 for 3. How is it you can't get a single thing right?

Bush had Bin Laden at Torah Borah and let him go.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 11:44:25 AM PDT
C. Gonzales says:
You don't know your history do you? Salem Bin Laden was involved deeply with Bush Sr and Bush Jr. In fact Salem helped bail out Arbusto Energy which George W. ran into the ground. Salem also did business with the Carlysle Group which George H.W. Bush worked for.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 12:10:58 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Sep 14, 2012 12:11:26 PM PDT
Brian Curtis says:
Ahh, you screwed up again, GG. You mentioned something that could be checked! And sure enough, the facts once again prove you wrong.

You've got to stay away from those comments that relate to the real world, GG; they'll trip you up every time! The truth just refuses to conform to your absurd beliefs.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 1:31:12 PM PDT
gginnc says:
I seem to be in danger fo becoming like your lot, maybe I just know.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 14, 2012 1:36:41 PM PDT
Raedwulf says:
No.
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Participants:  14
Total posts:  220
Initial post:  Sep 14, 2012
Latest post:  Oct 10, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions
This discussion is about
Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President
Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President by Jerome R. Corsi (Hardcover - 2011)
3.5 out of 5 stars   (313)