|
WARNING:
CHOKING HAZARD -- Small parts. Not for children under 3 yrs. |
|
WARNING:
CHOKING HAZARD -- Small parts. Not for children under 3 yrs. |
Product Features
|
Product Details
Would you like to give feedback on images?
|
For 2 to 4 players.
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
86 of 89 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Great Blast From The Past But Not Good For Little Ones,
By A Customer
= Durability:2.0 out of 5 stars = Fun:3.0 out of 5 stars = Educational:2.0 out of 5 stars
This review is from: Cootie (Toy)
I recently ordered Milton Bradley's "Ants In The Pants" and "Cootie Bug" games for my 3 year old son. These games were a total blast from the past and I just had to get them when I saw them on your site. Ants In The Pants is great but Cootie Bug is NOT good for this age group. I was so disappointed because the game has too many little pieces, is a little more complicated than I remembered, and the game board was in pieces in minutes (flimsy cardboard). Suprisingly enough, my 3 year old son is really careful with his toys and is not "destructive" by any means. And although this toy was not expensive, it was a waste of money for his age group.Just wanted to provide some feedback and possibly save some other parents some money. Wait until your kids are 4 or 5 for this one.
17 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
I like the old version better.,
By "kard229" (West Salem, Ohio) - See all my reviews
= Durability:1.0 out of 5 stars = Fun:2.0 out of 5 stars = Educational:3.0 out of 5 stars
This review is from: Cootie (Toy)
We purchased this game for my daughter. She is only 2 1/2, but we figured it would be fun to just try and put together the legs, eyes etc. My husband and I were so disappointed in this game. You just keep rolling for legs basically. The eyes are one unit now. The head kept falling off of the bodies. The lips on mine fell off throughout the entire game. None of us could get the legs into the holes without a huge effort. We knew that our daughter might have difficulty with the game at her age, but we never anticipated the trouble we would have. I would not waste my money on this game. It isn't one we be able to use in the future. The quality is very poor. They took a fun game and made it very frustrating.
21 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A classic changed, and not for the better.,
By xixiv (Maine) - See all my reviews
= Durability:4.0 out of 5 stars = Fun:3.0 out of 5 stars = Educational:4.0 out of 5 stars
This review is from: Cootie (Toy)
.... Cootie is a classic, but unfortunately the new cootie is not as good as the old. Each player used to have to get two eyes and two antennae. Now it is one set of eyes and one set of headtopping. So now your four year old sits and plays with fewer rewarding possibilities while waiting for the six sixes needed for the legs. Remarkably bad change in a great game for children of all ages. A great game because the little ones can win fair and square knowing that they got no help from the grown ups.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|