Hawaii Reporter Says Fair Examination Of Obama's Birth Certificate Would Be Prudent


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-13 of 13 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Oct 15, 2011 6:24:07 PM PDT
BROMAN says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Oct 15, 2011 9:07:51 PM PDT
Mark J. Hale says:
So?

Posted on Oct 16, 2011 2:46:04 AM PDT
Arus says:
so? he's not a judge, nor is he the Hawaii State Department of Health. Just a reporter. Whooopeeee doooooo

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 16, 2011 5:57:40 AM PDT
Dalekmaster says:
"Attorney Orly Taitz posted an email from Hawaii's Fox News affiliate KHON-2 News reporter stating it would be prudent that Obama's (non-existent) birth certificate get a fair examination. The email posted below KHON-2's Andrew Pereira's bio."

Tough. A TV reporter doesn't get to tell HDOH to set aside state privacy laws. Only a judge can do that, and Pereira is not a judge. Just more whining from Dr. Orly.

Posted on Oct 16, 2011 10:48:00 AM PDT
Jimmy E. says:
However under Hawaii Revised Statutes 338-18(b)Point 9, a confidential birth record can be released to: "a person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction."
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrs2006/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0018.HTM

I have to admit to being utterly amazed that in the four and a half years since January 10, 2007, when Barack Obama first announced that he was a candidate for the presidency, no one has gone to a judge and asked a judge to issue a court order for release of the Obama birth certificate.
Birthers have tried to get the birth certificate released via subpoenas but subpoenas are not court orders.
A judge issues a court order.

What is a court order?
"A court order is a legal document or proclamation in which a court orders a person to perform a specific act, prohibits him from performing an act, sets a court date, or legally establishes something. For example, a court order may require an individual to pay a specific amount of money to another party. A court order may also prohibit a person from doing something, such as walking across another party's property. Some court orders are used to set a date specifying when parties involved in a case are expected to appear in court. Other court orders may establish the relationship between parties in a case.

In most cases, court orders are given in writing and signed by a judge. In some places, however, only a judge's signature isn't enough; an order also may have to be notarized to make it official. There are even cases in which a court order is given orally by the judge in open court. In such a case, the order may be recorded in the court's transcripts but not given to the parties in writing."

Depending on the type of case, a person may suffer penalties for failing to follow the instructions in a court order. For example, a person may lose a case by default if he fails to show up in court at the date and time specified in a court order. If a defendant fails to appear for his trial, he may be arrested and put in jail.

Posted on Oct 18, 2011 3:27:12 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 18, 2011 4:12:35 PM PDT
Sarah999 says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 18, 2011 6:45:22 PM PDT
Dalekmaster says:
"I've muted you . .i.e., you're dumb!"

This from someone who routinely accuses anti-birthers of "put-downs & ad hominem attacks." The lady doth protest too much, methinks...

Posted on Oct 18, 2011 6:59:48 PM PDT
Jimmy E. says:
I wonder why Sarah bothers to post here since she obviously has no interest in having a DISCUSSION on an "Amazon Customer DISCUSSION" board.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 18, 2011 7:41:36 PM PDT
Lisa K. says:
Orly has asked for a Judge to issue a court order allowing her to view the BC. She asked a Judge in Hawaii to order the DoH to allow her into the records vault to view Obama's BC. Orly also asked a Judge to find Fuddy in contempt of court and to jail Fuddy because Fuddy didn't follow a "court signed subpoena" (meaning that the court clerk signed off on the subpoena, not that the subpoena was a "court order" by a Judge as Orly told her followers). Fuddy was under no obligation to follow Orly's subpoena since a Judge had NOT signed off on it. As with all Orly attempts, Orly failed.

Keep up.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 18, 2011 7:42:35 PM PDT
Lisa K. says:
And yet you birfers write off any journalist who says that they held Obama's long-form BC?

Hilarious!!

Posted on Oct 19, 2011 11:43:29 AM PDT
I'm watching the President right now on TV and he is about five miles away from where I am now. Pretty cool !!!!!!!!!

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 20, 2011 4:49:05 PM PDT
Raedwulf says:
The hypocrisy and craziness of this post is hysterical.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 20, 2011 6:08:49 PM PDT
Dalekmaster says:
Yep, even by birther standards Sarah is nuttier than squirrel poop.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Participants:  9
Total posts:  13
Initial post:  Oct 15, 2011
Latest post:  Oct 20, 2011

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions
This discussion is about
Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President
Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President by Jerome R. Corsi (Hardcover - 2011)
3.5 out of 5 stars   (315)