Top critical review
29 of 32 people found this helpful
It all comes down to the lack of editing
on March 23, 2012
First, let me state that I love the story that Denise Daisy has created here. I am captivated. However, there really is something to be said for getting an editor. I could have edited this book better, and I am by no means a grammar expert. Examples include starring instead of staring (consistent, but consistently WRONG), sense instead of since, misplaced or missing apostrophes, misplaced or missing commas, ugh. The list goes on. It really detracted from the story. In a few places I had to read a few lines repeatedly to try to figure it all out. I think the editing was even worse in this book than in the first. Love the story, but I am disappointed with the overall result.