• List Price: $40.00
  • Save: $4.00 (10%)
Only 1 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Eligible for FREE Super Saving Shipping! Fast Amazon shipping plus a hassle free return policy mean your satisfaction is guaranteed! Tracking number provided with every order.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism into Philosophy in Light of the Unpublished Seminars of 1933-1935 Hardcover – November 24, 2009


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$36.00
$18.00 $3.00
Best%20Books%20of%202014

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Holiday Deals in Books
Holiday Deals in Books
Find deals for every reader in the Holiday Deals in Books store, featuring savings of up to 50% on cookbooks, children's books, literature & fiction, and more.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 464 pages
  • Publisher: Yale University Press; First edition (November 24, 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0300120869
  • ISBN-13: 978-0300120868
  • Product Dimensions: 6.1 x 1.2 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.7 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 2.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (22 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,926,135 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

“Is it possible for a great philosopher to become a devoted Nazi? In his absorbing and challenging study Emmanuel Faye grasps the complexity of Martin Heidegger the man and the magnitude of his achievement."—Elie Wiesel
(Elie Wiesel)

“Faye’s reading of Heidegger’s philosophy is quite simply transformative. Through a meticulous perusal of new sources—letters, heretofore unpublished seminars and lecture courses—he demonstrates that, during the 1920s and 1930s, right-wing ideological concerns were absolutely central to Heidegger’s Existenzphilosophie. Upon completing Faye’s study, it will be impossible to read Heidegger again naively, i.e., in a narrowly text-immanent manner.” — Richard Wolin, author of Heidegger’s Children and Distinguished Professor of History and Political Science, CUNY Graduate Center

(Richard Wolin)

"Emmanuel Faye incontestably shows that Heidegger’s Nazism was not fleeting, casual or accidental, but central to his philosophical enterprise.  Faye’s book challenges us to draw the ethical consequences from this fact." — Robert E. Norton, University of Notre Dame

(Robert E. Norton)

“The book is not a pamphlet but the outcome of several years of extensive and serious research. […] Faye has unquestionably succeeded in collecting and laying out for the reader the documents of Heidegger’s deep involvement with National Socialism.”—Robin Celikates, H-Net Reviews in the Humanities & Social Sciences
(Robin Celikates)

"All scholars and admirers of Martin Heidegger’s œuvre should read the voluminous book on Heidegger’s infusion of Nazism into philosophy published by Emmanuel Faye. Having studied this tome, even French Heideggerians will no longer be able to deny the embarrassing depth and persistence of Heidegger’s philosophical involvment with Hitler’s National Socialism."—Herman Philipse, Dialogue, Canadian Philosophical Review
(Herman Philipse)

Bronze medal winner of the 2009 Book of the Year Award in the Philosophy category, presented by ForeWord magazine
(Book of the Year Award ForeWord Magazine 2010-01-01)

About the Author

Emmanuel Faye is associate professor at the University Paris Ouest–Nanterre La Défense and an authority on Descartes. Michael B. Smith is professor emeritus of French and philosophy at Berry College and the translator of numerous philosophical works into English.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

I'll finish this book, but....
o dubhthaigh
Heidegger's anti-Cartesianism is extremely impressive and does not lead to the right wing political extremism that Faye so passionately fears.
Robert Moore
The subject could have been discussed in a much more succinct and clear manner.
pelicanmd

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

116 of 146 people found the following review helpful By Robert Moore HALL OF FAMETOP 500 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on January 19, 2010
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
My review is going to differ from most of the others here in that I've actually read the book. This is no mean feat because it is pretty densely written and it refers to countless historical figures unlikely to be familiar to American readers, even those who have studied 20th century German Philosophy and Heidegger. Many of the people Faye discusses are second tier jurists or others who are relatively unknown. Faye also discusses better known figures, like Carl Schmitt and various students of Heidegger (a surprising number of whom were Jewish), but a substantial percentage of them are not academic household names.

Because anything touching politically controversial figures raises suspicions of one's own particular partisanship, let me provide some context by stating in rough outline my own positions. First, I'm extremely liberal politically, very, very far to the left. I consider today's Democratic party a moderate right part (as opposed to the Republicans, who have devolved into a radical right party) and I lament that there is no viable left in America today. I took a graduate seminar on Heidegger and read him in other grad school classes, but my philosophical preferences, despite specializing on Kierkegaard in my proposed but uncompleted doctoral dissertation, leaned strongly in the direction of Wittgenstein and Gilbert Ryle and J. L. Austin. So Heidegger represents neither my philosophical nor political ideal.

And I have no trouble whatsoever about viewing Heidegger as a Nazi. I will confess that this book reshaped my views about Heidegger and Nazism. Prior to the book I believed that Heidegger had backed away from the Nazis after ending his rectorship and that he had been rather tepid afterwards.
Read more ›
39 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Ian Kluge on December 12, 2013
Format: Paperback
This book is a paradox: it is both stupid and important. It's stupidity is not hard to see. If, as Faye contends, every line Heidegger ever wrote is soaked in Nazi philosophy, outlook and attitude, then it should follow that a substantial number of Heidegger's readers in addition to scholars should be Nazis or have strong Nazi sympathies. Faye doesn't produce a single shred of evidence that such is the case. Given that Heidegger is probably the most quoted twentieth century philosopher, our philosophical journals should be flooded with articles bearing the unmistakable brown hue of the NSDAP. So where are these articles? The fact that they are nowhere to be found, and that units of storm-troopers are not goose-stepping around philosophy departments all over the world tells us that Faye's thesis is not only fatally flawed but laughable. It is regrettable that Faye's enormous capacity for work was wasted on such an irrational project - which is no more than prejudices disguised (poorly)as scholarship.

Faye's book is laughable, but not unimportant. It is a warning of what happens when advocacy overruns scholarship. When scholars have personal axes to grind, scholarship loses its head, i.e. its rationality. In this age of activism and advocacy, Faye's book is a sharp reminder that scholarship without at least an attempt at objectivity and justice to our subject matter leaves us with only the mangled corpse of scholarship. Faye's book is important - and worth reading - as a warning of what advocacy scholarship can degenerate into. Every scholar should have a copy on his desk as a perpetual warning: Don't ever do this!

Secondly, the book is a also a useful reminder in our politically correct age that great talents are not always nice people.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
By Teed Rockwell on November 16, 2014
Format: Hardcover
Unlike Robert Moore, I haven't read the entire book, only those parts available on the Amazon page. However, I have ordered a copy and intend to finish it before I post again. Here, however, are some thoughts that occurred to me from what I have read so far.

Faye argues that Heidegger should be removed from the philosophical pantheon because his ideas are "linked" to many of the ideas of the Nazis. By this criterion, we should also ban Marx, because his ideas were unquestionably the foundation of many of the most evil behaviors of Communism. And yet, very properly, we continue to study Marx, because his writing contains many valuable insights intermixed with the errors and evils. We should do the same with Heidegger, even if he really does believe all of the vile positions that Faye attributes to him.

Furthermore the connections between Heidegger and Nazism are much more ephemeral that between Marx and Communism, because the Nazi's ideology was full of contradictions and muddles. Germany was full of conflicting ideologies at the time, and the Nazis strategy for political success was to embrace all of these contradictory ideologies simultaneously. Seems like a crazy strategy, but it worked. Now that we all agree that Nazis are bad guys, almost anyone can find a quote in the Nazi's propaganda that makes their enemy look like a Nazi. I have seen Libertarians argue that the Nazis were really Communists, and Leftists argue that the Nazis are Libertarians. There are passages about 'blood and soil' that have been used to show that modern environmentalists are Nazis. Former pope Benedict thought the SDS protestors at Columbia in the 60s were indistinguishable from the Nazi student demonstrators.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?