This book concerns itself with an issue that is not sufficiently addressed in the literature: Heidegger's philosophy of science. Although a great deal of attention is paid to Heidegger's later critique of technology, no one has systematically studied how he understood science.Many readers will be surprised to learn, through this book, that Heidegger developed the essentials of a fairly sophisticated philosophy of science, one that in many ways invites comparison with that of Thomas Kuhn. Glazebrook demonstrates that Heidegger's philosophy of science is not neatly divided into earlyand late(or Heidegger Iand Heidegger II) but is, rather, an ongoing development over at least three periods, bound together as an analysis of modern science and an uncovering of other possibilities for understanding nature. Glazebrook states in her introduction, This reading of Heidegger is radical. It cuts to the root of his thinking, for I argue that what are taken to be Heidegger's many and significant contributions to philosophy-that is, his overcoming of metaphysics, his rereading of the ancients, his critique of technology and representational thinking, his vision and revision of language, truth, and thinking-have at their core an inquiry into science that drove his thinking for sixty years. I am not arguing for a new reading of a few texts, or for adjustments and refinements of existing readings of Heideggger. Rather, I am bringing to light a new basis on which to interpret his work as a whole.
FREE Two-Day Shipping for students on millions of items. Learn more |
| |||||||||||||||
Book Description
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Trish Glazebrook is Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Religion at Colgate University.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Glazebrook states in her introduction," This reading of Heidegger is radical. It cuts to the root of his thinking, for I argue that what are taken to be Heidegger's many and significant contributions to philosophy- that is, his overcoming of metaphysics, his rereading of the ancients, his critique of technology and representational thinking, his vision and revision of language, truth, and thinking- have at their core an inquiry into science that drove his thinking for sixty years. I am not arguing for a new reading of a few texts, or for adjustment and refinement of existing readings of Heidegger. Rather, I am bringing to light a new basis on which to interpret his work as a whole."
--This text refers to the
Hardcover
edition.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The question of science,
By calcidius (Canada) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Heidegger's Philosophy of Science (Perspectives in Continental Philosophy) (Paperback)
This book attempts to bring a discussion of Heidegger's philosophy to bear on current discussions in analytic philosophy. Heidegger's thoughts are contrasted with Lakatos, Kuhn and others showing many of the similarities (and differences) there are between them. Many of the issues found in a basic philosophy of science text are also found here, such as: Underdetermination (basically the idea that the truth of no one theory can be determined by the data or by experiment), realism and antirealism, the nature of theories etc. -- what is emphasized most is the metaphysical and epistemological issues present in modern science. Of course, not all problems in the philosophy of science are found in Heidegger, but enough, apparently, to consider him a philosopher of science. The book also has a lot to say about our current modern age of scientific-technological ways of 'revealing' -- the discussion revolves around the modern ages concern with beings; making void all internal significance. The book is very interesting and has a lot more to it than the bits I've mentioned. The potential reader of this book might want to know that Greek expressions are used fairly frequently.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Centrality of the meaning of science for Heidegger,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Heidegger's Philosophy of Science (Perspectives in Continental Philosophy) (Paperback)
An excellent clarification of a murky and easily misunderstood topic in Heidegger's oeuvre. Glazebrook traces the many changes in Heidegger's attitude toward science from his early excitement to his later diagnosis of its nihilism. She makes a convincing argument that, far from being on the fringe of his philosophy, Heidegger spent six decades with science in the forefront of his thoughts, seeing it as the final stage of Greek metaphysics and the domniant influence on modernity. But, most importantly, Glazebrook makes it clear that Heidegger defines ontology at every stage of his rethinking in relation to his evolving understanding of the meaning and nature of science. She makes a strong case that since Heidegger's attitude toward science is determinitive for his ontology, they must be understood together. I see this as a must read for anyone seriously interested in Heidegger.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
