Customer Reviews

The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347-274 BC)

5 star:		(3)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

Professor Dillon is a delight to read. His scholarly books have brought ancient philosophers into the ambient discussions of the post-modern age. He has fulfilled a life time of teaching, learning and writing that has enriched humane scholarship enormously.

He is an international scholar with wide academic sympathies. Here in this treatise he discusses the men, texts, textual transmissions and significant ideas that were to influence the course of Western civilization and her many traditions. It was the heirs of Plato who started this vital chain from the ancient mind to the modern mind.

Any book this humane scholar has written demands reading; this book demands to be purchased and owned for one's personal library. It is the sort of book one reads over and over when they are a young scholar or youthful student.

Respectfully,


John E.D.P. Malin
Cecilia, Louisiana 70521-0460

--

Dillon is known to us mostly for his works on Neoplatonism and Middle Platonism (including his study - essential even today - "the middle platonists"). In this work he offers us the absent part of the history, namely: What happened when Plato died? And what happened before the turn of the Academy to scepticism?

Little is known from the fragments, although they seemed to write a lot (Xenocrates wrote more than 60 texts!). It's a shame that they weren't able to pass the barreer of time.

Dillon gives the only lenght-study about the period between the 340 and 260BC. His remarks are very provocative, and well argumented. And his last chapter on the turn to scepticism is almost vital for even the study of stoicism.

The first chapter deals with the physical space that was the academy, mostly from Diogenes Laertius and Aristotle. Then he remarks that the main interest of Plato wasn't to give a set of doctrines, but rather (as he learnt from Socrates) to inflict an interest for philosophy in the others.

Then he analyses the fragments for Speusippus (his nephew and first sucessor), Xenocrates and Phillipus (which it may be the writer of the platonic "Epinomis"). He then deals with the "minor figures" such as Hermodorus and Heraclides of Pontus.

Dillon work is academic yet accesible and very easy to read. One can follow the main argument withouth many problems. This work is really a must-have, and I expect that more works like this appears in the coming years.

I studied Plato long ago in college and graduate school and have returned to him frequently over the years. I recently saw the movie "Agora" which tells the story of the Neoplatonic philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria. I didn't like the movie, but it prompted me to think again about Plato and Neoplatonism. Thus, I found my way to this book "The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347 -- 274 BC)" (2005)by John Dillon. A scholar of the history of Platonism, Dillon is Regius Professor of Greek, Trinity College, Dublin. His best-known book probably remains his study "The Middle Platonists" (1977, rev.ed 1996)

Any study of Plato's successors and their importance must be predicated on the author's understanding of Plato's own thought. As Dillon observes at the outset in his Preface: "When Plato died, full of years, in 347 BC, he left behind him, not only a body of philosophical writings the like of which had never been seen before (or indeed, in respect of the peculiar quality, since) but also a remarkable organization, the 'Academy' .... and a devoted, though independent-minded body of disciples. Dillon's book begins with an explanation of how he views Plato's own difficult and fluid teaching.

When I studied years ago, Plato was taught almost exclusively by reading closely a select group of the Dialogues. The claim that Plato had a doctrine that he hinted at but did not state explicitly in the Dialogues was generally rejected and at best downplayed. This remains the more common approach today in interpreting Plato, but Dillon takes a different approach based on the Neoplatonic understanding of Plato. Dillon argues that Plato had, especially in his late years, a doctrine that he taught orally that does not appear fully in his writings. One reason for this position is the strictures of Aristotle against Plato in Aristotle's writings. Much of Aristotle's criticism is difficult to reconclile with the apparent teachings of Plato in the Dialogues. Aristotle studied with Plato for 20 years and according to Dillon must be presumed to have understood the rudiments of his master's teachings. Aristotle's criticisms reflect, Dillon argues, Plato's developed thought as it was presented outside the writings. The late dialogues that come closest to presenting Plato's teachings are the Timaeus, Philebus, and Laws X. Plato there developed the concept of the "demiurge" or "soul" of the universe. Plato's latter thought was also heavily mathematical and was influenced greatly by the legendary figure of Pythagoras. The Timaeus was the most influential of Plato's Dialogues in the years after his death even though it does not enjoy that status among most current scholars. For Dillon, Plato's understanding of soul and of the mathematical structure of reality was central to his thought and the basis for the manner in which his thought was developed by his immediate heirs.

The book's focus is on three individuals, Speusippus, Xenocrates, and Polemo, who served as the head of the Academy Plato founded in the 70 years following his death. Each of these individuals wrote prolifically, but none of their writings have survived. In order to reach an understanding of their thought, Dillon engages in informed re-creation. He takes the discussion of these writers that appears in other ancient sources to try to create a coherent statement of their likely philosophical contributions. The primary source for the doctrines of these thinkers is Aristotle who, of course, was strongly inclined to criticize them from the perspective of his own thought. Dillon also uses the writings of Diogenes Laertius, Plutarch, and Cicero, among others.

For each of his three primary subjects, Dillon gives a short summary of their lives and writings and then attempts from the surviving sources to tease out their doctrines in the areas of metaphysics, ethics, and logic. He tries to show that each of these thinkers expanded upon and developed Plato's teachings in creative and interesting ways. Thus, Plato's nephew Speusippus emerges as an early predecessor of Plotinus with his focus on the abstact nature of "the One" as the source of all being. Speusippus also seemed to naturalize Plato's concept of the "world soul" and to teach an ethics that gave more of a place to pleasure than did the teachings of Plato. Xenocrates is described as a systematizer who was the forerunner of the synthesis between Plato and Aristotle that became Neoplatonism. His thought was dualistic and made heavy use of Pythagorean allegory. Ptolemo, the third head of the Old Academy after Plato,was less systematic and more practical-mided than his predecessors. His teachings focused on ethics and led the way to the school of Stoicism.

Dillon also takes a shorter look at five minor historical figures from the early days of Platonism. The most interesting of these are Philippus, who served as Plato's scribe during the latter years of Plato's life and who is the author of an extant dialogue called "Epinomis" which was long attributed to Plato, and Crantor, who wrote the first commentary on a Platonic dialogue and who wrote an ethical tract "On Grief" that was highly regarded in antiquity. (It has been lost.) The book concludes with a short look at the turn of the Academy from doctrinal expositions of Plato's teachings to the skepticism and free-thinking that is also a hallmark of Plato's thought that came to dominate the Academy shortly after the figures described in Dillon's book.

In its development and critique of philosophical positions related to Plato, Dillon's book is both a history and a philosophical study in its own right. The book is learned, closely documented, and lucidly written. This book will appeal to scholars in classics and philosophy. But it will also appeal to lay readers with a strong background in and love for Plato and the philosophical mind.

Robin Friedman