Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Fun read, November 30, 2009
This review is from: Helfort's War Book 3: The Battle of Devastation Reef (Mass Market Paperback)
Fun read but not great literature. (potential spoiler) Get ready for another cliff hanger ending and be aware that their will be a Helfort's War Book 4.
The story picks up with the launch of the new Dreadnought strategy and we get into the internal politics of the Navy and society. You will see a thinly veiled story based on today's headlines with a futuristic spin. Young idealist frustrated by the "system"and by his personal heroism, grit and determination he attempts to overcome both the Hammers and the system.
Lots of bang bang action, multiple threads and a lot of heroism and team camaraderie.
View this as an old fashioned Space Opera with lots of villains, good guys, and beautiful women. Lots of fun but not great literature
Why four stars? It is a fun read to give you a break from a hectic day. I really like series and the books are easy to read and fun.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
ship to ship battles are still lame, January 5, 2010
This review is from: Helfort's War Book 3: The Battle of Devastation Reef (Mass Market Paperback)
A reviewer for the first book opined that the space battles were lame. I gave the series the benefit of the doubt at the time, but now I've concluded that I have to agree. The space battles in this series are just not exciting. They do not involve any large scale ship maneuvers, defensive or offensive formations, dog fighting, running fights, or even dodging incoming shots. The only tactics seem to be: sneak in, be the first to shoot and hope your shields can absorb the response when it arrives in 10 minutes.
In addition, Paul continues to have his characters do, in my opinion, totally stupid things as if that was their only option. Case in point (SPOILERS!), Lt. Helfort has disabled the Hammer's asteroid's defensive positions with missles and followed up with rail gun strafing. A couple of severely damaged Hammer Battle Stations are still taking pot shots at his approaching fleet of Dreadnoughts with their few remaining guns. It is clearly stated that because of his Dreadnought's armor, these were futile attempts to stop him. Yet, he orders a couple of his Dreadnoughts, which incidentally are the only remaining combat effective Fleet World ships left and are still pretty much undamaged, to kamikaze the battle stations! Why?! Why couldn't he have rail gunned the Battle Stations some more? Why did he throw away good ships especially when he was expecting additional Hammer reinforcements due to the importance of this asteroid base?
I was really tempted to give this novel 2 stars just for this idiocy. However, the rest of the story was ok. The writing is pretty good. The dialog still needs improvement though. The banter sounds fake or forced. The stories have not endeared me to the characters, but are interesting enough for me to follow to see what happens next.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
[caution... spoilers imminent...]
Helfort's War, January 15, 2010
I am relatively new to the Helfort's War series, and am proud to have finished the whole series to date within a week. I just read a few of the other reviews, and feel obliged to share my opinion. It seems to me, at least, that Mr. Paul has most certainly gotten down the process of creating a suspensfull behind-the-lines story, and it's not repetetive at all from book to book. Unfortunantly, I can see with equal clarity the need for more exciting ship-to-ship battles, perhaps adding new additions such as a fighter/bomber and plasma anti-ship cannons. Personally, I like his idea of a "trashpress," that and his view of corrupting political decisions interfering with military planning and needlessly wasting human personell. If you're wondering why I gave this five stars, it's because the rest of the book balances out the space conflicts. Work on #4, Mr. Paul. We'll wait for it, and it'll be the best yet.
Signing out,
~Theo C~
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|