The Hellenistic Age: A Short History (Modern Library Chronicles) (Hardcover)

by Peter Green (Author)
Key Phrases: The Hellenistic Age, Asia Minor, Final Solution (more...)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. Although the Hellenistic Age flourished for barely 300 years, its contributions to world history are countless. Eminent historian Green—whose classic Alexander to Actium remains the most expansive and thorough introduction to the period—offers a marvelous survey of the key people, places and events of the years from 337 B.C., when Alexander came to power, to the death of Cleopatra in 30 B.C. Nimbly weaving history and cultural insights, Green chronicles how Alexander led Macedonia through heroism and canny political alliances. After Alexander's death, power was divided between the Ptolemies, who ruled Egypt, and the Seleucids, who ruled Greece, marking the beginning of the end of the Greek city-states that had been the hallmark of the classical Greek age. The civic masculine bonding so pervasive in Alexander's day was replaced by the familial bonding of husband and wife. Science replaced poetry and comedy replaced tragedy as the cultural hallmarks of society. Yet much remained the same: aristocratic rulers still used slaves to do their fighting for them, and monarchs still defied attempts to bring democracy into government. Green's splendid little study (a new entry in Modern Library's Chronicles series) provides a brilliant introduction to this crucial transitional period. (Apr. 10)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From The Washington Post
Reviewed by Michael Dirda

Speak of Greek antiquity, and most people will call to mind the golden age of 5th century B.C. Athens -- the time of Socrates, Plato, Thucydides, Sophocles, Pericles. Without question, these intellectual titans decisively influenced western thought and culture. For centuries, their noble brows and visages, sculpted in mottled white marble, adorned the reading rooms of university libraries and the leather-chaired lounges of gentlemen's clubs. They were, after all, paragons, and later generations were required to look up to them. Little wonder, then, that after a while these overly revered Grecians started to seem more than just a trifle smug and self-satisfied. We're so smart, and you're not.

In recent years, the periods just before and after the Athenian miracle have grown increasingly attractive to modern readers and scholars. The surviving fragments of the pre-Socratic philosophers and poets -- Heraclitus, Archilochus, Sappho -- now seem to capture more feelingly the relentless mutability of life, whether the ups and downs of the suffering human heart or the ceaseless shocks of an inherently unstable world. This sense of familiarity is even more pronounced in the three war-torn centuries bracketed between the Asian conquests of Alexander the Great (356-323 B.C.) and the naval battle at Actium (31 B.C.), which hastened the downfall of Ptolemaic Egypt and assured the triumph of imperial Rome.

After Philip of Macedon made himself the master of Greece following his great victory in the battle of Chaeronea (338 B.C.), his son waited impatiently for a chance to display his own mettle. Once he inherited the throne at 20, Alexander immediately launched a seemingly never-ending campaign to conquer the known world. In part he wished to outdo the achievements of Heracles and Achilles but, as Peter Green tells us in The Hellenistic Age, he also desperately needed the riches of Asia to support his overextended and debt-laden government and to pay off the soldiers in his army. The stocky, clean-shaven warrior, who personally led his men into battle, cared little for the trappings of wealth; what really mattered to him was kleos, the Greek term for glory. For 11 years, he consequently fought his way across modern-day Turkey, Iran and Afghanistan to the frontiers of India, where he defeated the army and elephants of King Porus. But then his own battle-weary troops refused to go any farther, and Alexander was forced to turn back toward Europe. In the city of Babylon, he fell ill with a high fever and died at the age of 32.

On his deathbed, the conqueror reportedly willed his spear-won empire "to the strongest." As a result, he set in motion three centuries of conflict, starting with a power struggle among his generals, today called the Diadochoi, or Successors. Eventually, three kingdoms emerged: one in Europe, composed of Macedonia and greater Greece; another in Asia, reigned over by the Seleucids; and the Egypt of the Ptolemys. All these then jockeyed for total domination through "the well-tried Hellenistic blend of diplomacy, aggression, intermarriage and murder," not to overlook outright war. Being so intently focused on one another, these incestuous and ruthless monarchs -- they seldom hesitated to murder their own children when necessary -- shortsightedly neglected "the cloud from the West." But once Rome had defeated Hannibal and destroyed Carthage, it began to extend its political hegemony into Successor-held territories. Battles ensued, and nearly always the Roman legion defeated the Greek phalanx. By the time Cleopatra ensnared first Julius Caesar and then Mark Antony, that "serpent of old Nile" was playing a desperate game to preserve Egypt from becoming a satrapy of Rome. To no avail. "Finish good lady, the bright day is done,/ And we are for the dark."

The Hellenistic Age is subtitled "A Short History," but to sum up the period's complexity and richness in under 200 pages requires a draconian conciseness. More often than not, enlivening anecdote and detail have been sacrificed, leaving an overly schematic outline (and an overuse of colons in the sentences). For instance, Green tantalizingly refers several times to the mass marriages at Susa but never explains what these were (Alexander and his Macedonian officers married Persian women, in theory to cement the unity of East and West). Moreover, as the political history grows increasingly bloody and frantic, it also grows difficult to keep clear who's who, since the names Demetrius, Antigonus, Alexander, Philip, Ptolemy and Cleopatra recur from generation to generation. At one point, four women gamely, if vainly, distinguished as Cleopatra the Sister, Cleopatra the Wife, Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra Tryphaena vie with one another for power. After a while, one hungers for a more leisurely and expansive narrative. In his defense, Green does underscore that The Hellenistic Age is simply an introduction, and he duly offers a prefatory overview of "backgrounds and sources," as well as an up-to-date guide to further reading.

As it happens, that guide to further reading includes a magnificent (if occasionally contrarian) account of this fascinating period titled Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age (1993), by none other than Peter Green. The poet Callimachus famously observed, "Big book, big mistake," but not in this case. In its nearly 1,000 pages, replete with illustrations, Alexander to Actium explores every aspect of these three racked centuries. By contrast, this short digest for Modern Library Chronicles can mainly just assert a point and move on. For instance, in The Hellenistic Age Green notes that literature and culture are characterized by escapism from a brutal reality, an antiquarian reverence for the Greek past (this is the heyday of the scholiast and the Library of Alexandria), a widespread belief in Tyche (chance or fortune), and a preference for the personal, introspective and fantastical over the patriotic, public-spirited and pragmatic.

All these assertions are examined with supporting evidence in Green's full-length account: There he offers entire chapters on the Epicureans and Stoics, on the mystery religions surrounding Dionysus, Isis and Cybele, on the plays of Menander, the mimes of Herodas, the epigrammatic verse of Callimachus, the vastly influential pastoral idylls of Theocritus, and the epic Argonautica by Apollonius of Rhodes. Rather than merely refer to them, he discusses the achievements of Euclid and Archimedes and Diogenes. Art receives a similarly in-depth treatment: This is, after all, the era that produced such sculpture as the Aphrodite of Melos (a.k.a. the "Venus de Milo"), the winged Nike or Victory of Samothrace, the languorous Barberini "Faun" and the once rabidly admired, now rather despised, Laocoön.

Despite the superiority of Alexander to Actium, there's no gainsaying its enormous length. (I haven't even mentioned its author's related biography, Alexander of Macedon.) So readers with other calls on their attention should, faute de mieux, still spend a couple of evenings with The Hellenistic Age. Green doesn't approach the past by kowtowing to it. He writes with strong views, avoids jargon and isn't afraid of arguing with received opinion. In his youth this emeritus professor of classics at the University of Texas worked as a journalist and reviewer, published novels (The Laughter of Aphrodite) and even a biography of Kenneth Grahame (author of The Wind in the Willows); he lived by his pen. In his scholarly work, he has brought to bear the same kind of panache. The Alexandrian "Museum and Library, like the J. Paul Getty Center (which in many ways they much resemble), never seem to have had payroll problems, and their resident scholars enjoyed permanent appointments."

He pointedly notes that slaves fueled the economy of the ancient world as oil does ours. With even greater daring, he berates the Stoics and countercultural Cynics for their quietism, despite "the dilemma that faced a thinking man in a world where, no longer master of his fate, he had to content himself with being, in one way or another, captain of his soul." Most tellingly of all, he repeats that the lot of a slave or peasant (in this or almost any other era) did not improve until the late 18th-century Industrial Revolution, when machine power finally replaced manpower.

Fragmented, insecure, ivory-towered, obsessed with sex and celebrity, the Hellenist era is, as all historians agree, the period of classic antiquity that most resembles our own. This isn't a happy thought, but it does add another reason for exploring these troubled and often sleazy centuries between the age of Athens and the age of Rome.

Copyright 2007, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 240 pages
• Publisher: Modern Library; 1st. Ed edition (April 3, 2007)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 067964279X
• ISBN-13: 978-0679642794
• Product Dimensions: 8.3 x 5.4 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 12.8 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #548,968 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Packs an enormous amount into a few hundred pages, January 29, 2008

By	K. Kehler (B.C., Canada) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This excellent - and occasionally harrowing - overview of the Hellenistic age is very much worth reading. It's much less long than his earlier account (Alexander to Actium, published some 20 years earlier). For that reason, it is better for neophytes and beginners, especially those who want a very good overview of a crucial and interesting period in the history of an area stretching from Greece to Pakistan. But it is also a tasty morsel for experienced Hellenists, who certainly know Green's work from his other brilliant writings. As for the allegation that Green hasn't been to the places he discusses, that's absurd. Green might be a professor, but he's notorious for leaving the ivory tower and going and spending time in the places whose history he charts. I said earlier that the account is harrowing. It is because of the horror show of suffering, violence, war, uncertainty and instability that characterizes the entire age -- especially for ordinary people -- which still manages to be one of the more pleasant ever to hit that particular fraught troubled region. Why were things so bad? It is as though one petty despot, psycho, and/or satrap after another tries his hand at domination in each and every one of the little city states (especially when his master isn't paying attention) in the area. To sum up, give Green a chance. Read either this book or one of his many others, or perhaps a translation. He's a marvelous guide to the past.

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Concise Rendition of a Transitional Age, August 5, 2007

By	Michael A. Anderson "reads at random" (Chicago, IL USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

As the title suggests ("A Short History") this treatment of the period sacrifices depth for brevity. Not being familiar with the subject I enjoyed this well-written introduction. Not only is the book a good first overview, it has plenty of notes geared towards further study and a short guide to further reading indicating what the author considers current best texts--as well as the usual bibliography.

3.0 out of 5 stars Aiming at the wrong audience, February 16, 2009

By	Molly Liskow (New Jersey) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This review is from: The Hellenistic Age: A Short History (Modern Library Chronicles) (Paperback)

I thought this was supposed to be a survey for those of us not expert on the topic, so why is he dragging in 19th-Century Greek poets, and using terms nonexperts won't know? And what's with the love of foreign terms? De haut en bas, indeed! (Yes, I know what it means. But there are some terms I don't know and couldn't find, including untranslated Greek. I had Greek decades ago in college. Most readers probably never had it.) Substantively, I'd have liked more on the Seleucids. He refers to the Parthians eventually taking over while the Seleucids were having their dynastic quarrels, but doesn't go any farther on that topic. He seems much more interested in the parts taken over by Rome: Greece, Asia Minor, and Egypt. Also, the grammar is awful. Doesn't anyone copy edit anymore?