Herman Melville and the American Calling: The Fiction After Moby-Dick, 1851-1857 [Paperback]

William V. Spanos (Author)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 0791475646 | ISBN-13: 978-0791475645 | Publication Date: July 1, 2009

Argues that Herman Melville's later work anticipates the resurgence of an American exceptionalist ethos underpinning the U.S. -led global "war on terror.

Editorial Reviews

From the Back Cover

Oriented by the new Americanist perspective, this book constitutes a rereading of Herman Melville's most prominent fiction after Moby-Dick. In contrast to prior readings of this fiction, William V. Spanos's interpretation takes as its point of departure the theme of spectrality precipitated by the metaphor of orphanage--disaffiliation from the symbolic fatherland, on the one hand, and the myth of American exceptionalism on the other--that emerged as an abiding motif in Melville's creative imagination. This book voices an original argument about Melville's status as an "American" writer, and foregrounds Melville's remarkable anticipation and critique of the exceptionalism that continues to drive American policy in the post-9/11 era.

"[The author is] at his best when connecting the theoretical perspectives to the literary and cultural narratives, shedding light on both. Just as important ... Spanos extends new Americanist reconsideration of American literary studies into more global perspectives. This [is a ] provocative study." -- CHOICE

"In this uncannily timely book, Spanos provides a brilliant interpretation of the history of Melville's reception and discloses the pertinence of Melville's work to the present historical conjuncture--when American exceptionalist rhetoric has resulted in a rehabilitation of the representation of the United States as the `Redeemer Nation' engaged in a global war on terror. This book is an extremely important intervention into American literary and political culture by one of Melville's, and America's, most gifted critics." -- Donald E. Pease, coeditor of Futures of American Studies

"Spanos interprets Melville's major writing after Moby-Dick by using the resources of deconstructive and poststructural theory to demonstrate the powerful relevance Melville's work maintains for our day, even as it arises from the specific history of Melville's time. In developing this argument, Spanos differs not only from many major past critics, but also from important contemporary `New Americanists.' He exercises an independent and distinctive intelligence, and this book will enter the body of writing on Melville as both authoritative and controversial. This is an outstanding piece of work." -- Jonathan Arac, author of The Emergence of American Literary Narrative, 1820-1860

About the Author

William V. Spanos is Distinguished Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Binghamton University, State University of New York. He is the author of many books, including American Exceptionalism in the Age of Globalization: The Specter of Vietnam, also published by SUNY Press, and The Errant Art of Moby-Dick: The Canon, the Cold War, and the Struggle for American Studies.

Product Details

• Paperback: 296 pages
• Publisher: State University of New York Press (July 1, 2009)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0791475646
• ISBN-13: 978-0791475645
• Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 5.9 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 14.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 2.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,197,524 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2.0 out of 5 stars Calling out America, August 3, 2011

By 

smithy "kurios" - See all my reviews

This review is from: Herman Melville and the American Calling: The Fiction After Moby-Dick, 1851-1857 (Paperback)

William V. Spanos, founding editor of "boundary 2", tells us that his book was created out of a crisis "at a time I was beginning to think that intellectual work in America was futile" (xiv). It takes up the argument of his "The Errant Art of Moby-Dick: The Cannon, the Cold War", and "The Struggle for American Studies" (1995) that Melville's work anticipates the destruction of the American episteme in "the United States' arrogant and brutal intervention in Vietnam" (3) and delegitimates the discourse of the New World Order. This crisis has intensified with the reaction to the attacks of September 11, 2001, and the Ahab-like War on Terror that has rejuvenated the American calling to carve out a world in its own image. The toxic mixture of neo-conservatism and evangelical Christianity has mobilized the American exceptionalist ethos, "re-achieving a religio-patriotic unity" (100), that Melville corrosively deconstructed and which led to him being frozen into silence by his contemporaries.

Subsequent efforts to rehabilitate Melville's later fiction as a self-critical part of the great American tradition, or efforts to criticize him for complicity with this imperial vision, have under-valued the incisiveness of his interrogation of American exceptionalism and the rhetoric and thematics of spectrality. Now, with the advent of postructuralist theory we can at last begin to grasp the nature of Melville's post-humanist anticipation of the deconstruction of the self-enclosed subject. Spanos will illuminate "the relevance of Melville's fiction for the late postmodern, indeed, post-9/11, American occasion" (34):

"What ... the silent specter of Melville's post-Moby-Dick fiction calls for now in an age that the arrogant intellectual deputies of the official culture of America first identified as "the end of history" and the advent of the 'New World Order' presided over by the United States, and later, after the attack on American soil on 9/11/01, re-inscripted as the perpetual 'war on terror', is a spectral politics, a politics that puts into positive practice the dislocating refusal of Pierre, of Bartleby, of Israel Potter, of Babo, and of the Confidence-Man. Until that time comes to pass ... resistance, no matter how vocal, will remain impotent or complicit with America's (exceptionalist) apparatuses of capture." (55)

The attacks on 9/11 "have enabled the contemporary custodians of the American national identity to recuperate the exceptionalist national identity that was shaken to its foundations in the 1960s" (100).

According to Spanos, the American calling that Melville resists after flirting with it in his early fiction is the calling of manifest destiny. As he de-centres this American subjection and incorporation, so too does he subvert the calling (interpellation) of the transcendental (father's) voice of Europe. Melville's fiction from "Moby-Dick; Or, The Whale" to "The Confidence-Man" "--from his prophetic announcement of the self-destruction of the logical economy of the Adamic ship of state to his decisive de-realization of the ant-bellum American reality produced by the relay of optimistic philosophies that had their origin in the myth of Puritan election--constitutes a sustained haunting of the exceptionalist problematic, past, present, and future" (17). Although Melville's interrogation of the American ideology has be noted by other critics, Spanos aims to show the postmodern "revolutionary force" (17) of Melville's fiction after Moby-Dick by tracing the "fundamental affiliation between metaphysics and cultural production" (29). Melville's "essential legacy" (52) is "remarkably proleptic of the postmodern occasion" (43) in the grip of "the post-Cold War neoconservative version of the (Anglo-Protestant) American national identity and its messianic imperialist democracy" (103).

"Pierre; or, the Ambiguities" is read to reveal Melville's genealogical uncovering of the connection between the New World of American and the Old World of Europe--"patriarchal, patrician, feudal, nationalist, class structured, and racist" (27)--that structures the hegemonic weaving of the Puritan ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Pierre is more than simply proleptic of "postmodern counterhegemic discourse" (29) for it reveals that cultural representation is "ontological representation, that is the re-presentation of being in terms of ... a principle of presence" (29). Melville's criticism of the American Transcendentalists "remarkably anticipates Heidegger's deconstruction of the Western [ontotheological] philosophical tradition" (29). Melville's critique of American narrative representation constitutes "a remarkable anticipation of Jean-Paul Sartre's proto-postmodern distinction between living and telling" (36), and the "critique of narrative in Pierre also constitutes a remarkable anticipation of Jacques Derrida's postmodern deconstruction of the `Book'" (37). Recovering "Melville's remarkably proleptic intention" (46) discloses "[i]n a way that uncannily anticipates the Derridean analysis of the nonconcept differance" (40) how "Melville makes thinking the spectral nothing and its worldly manifestations possible" (49). The spectral voice of silence that Pierre discovers at the heart of the monumentalized American Cultural Memory "anticipat[es] Friedrich Nietzsche's assault on `monumental history'" (58) and "constitutes Melville's most revolutionary legacy to the postmodern American occasion" (50) for it is "proleptic of that polyvalent resistance to global capitalist power ..." (51).

Spanos usefully draws links between two speeches (1825 and 1843) of the orator-statesman Daniel Webster and Israel Potter: His Fifty Years of Exile. Melville skillfully deconstructs the rhetoric and tropes of Webster's speeches, and subtly derails the performative representation of American national unity "to expose the national amnesia incumbent on monumentalization" (68). Melville "retrieves the singularities passed over by the American national memory in the nation-building process" (71) and gives a negative portrait of Benjamin Franklin that "epitomizes the calculative and economically rewarding prosaicness of the American national identity" (79). Indeed Melville "retrieves the specter of Israel Potter's forgotten singular being, a retrieval that appropriates Israel's symptomatic liberatory refusal to be interpellated--to be somebody, which is to say, to be answerable to the American calling--for the purpose of subverting and delegitimizing the invisible repressive nationalist hegemonic discourse of American exceptionalism" (91). Babo of "Benito Cereno" and Bartleby of "Bartleby the Scrivener" are read as kindred spirits that haunt the discourse of the American civilising mission. What the liberal humanist Captain Delano cannot see is the brutality of the slave system that will haunt America, just as the lawyer-narrator's benevolent and democratic capitalist way of seeing attempts to assimilate the unaccountable Bartleby and so neutralize his threat to repressive power.

"The Confidence-Man" pushes the idea of optimistic progress to its logical and self-destructive conclusion and affords "proleptic insights into the second Bush administration's confident justification and conduct of its `war on terror'" (172). Melville is "remarkably proleptic of that form of genealogy that Michel Foucault, following Nietzsche, calls the parodic" (177), and Melville' final novel takes aim at the confidence attendant on Manifest Destiny and American capitalist Progress. Noting that the genocidal metaphysics of Indian-hating distills the terroristic teleology of the frontier myth, Spanos argues that the reductive ontology of this murderous racial sociopolitics "is blind to the nothingness that is ontologically prior to the reified and self-identical Being (the Monos or One) it constructs as `the real'" (189). While the exterminatory Indian-hater is certainly a misanthrope--the nature of his work keeps him away from the civilized company he makes possible--he is the counterpart of the Cosmopolitan's optimistic faith in confidential fidelity. Melville's novel suggests that misanthropy is as essential to the American capitalist spirit as is optimism. Both form part of a self-confident assertion that is self-fulfilling, "banalized and embodied in the duplicitous entrepreneurs of an emergent American capitalism" (194). Congenial optimism becomes the philosophical manifestation of the bloodless congenial misanthrope, the operator in the world of human relations where all is a matter of economic profit and loss. Spanos convincingly links the story of China Aster to the metaphysics of American capitalism and the metaphysics of Indian-hating.

"The Confidence-Man" discloses "the ontological genealogy of this confidence syndrome" (214) and is a "proleptic exposure of the deadly confidence game the present Bush administration (and the custodians of its nationalist/imperialist policies--I am referring, above all, to `The Projects for a New American Century') has been playing with the American public" (217). The con game played by the Confidence-Man involves manipulating "his American victims' confidence" by "exaggerat[ing] the threat to their passive confidence posed by the apparent contradictions all the more to reactivate it" (219). For the Confidence-Man's American victims the Muslim/terrorist scare has now taken the place of the Red Scare. Their gullibility and ultimate assurance that the American way is right stand in the was of reacting to disclosure's of America's barbarity according to "responsible and humane imperatives" (219). Spanos concludes that, although American history has always been directed by confidence-men because the metanarrative of American exceptionalism necessarily reproduces them, now "its status as masquerade, an ideological con game intended to... Read more ›