Customer Reviews

Heroes and Villains: Essays on Music, Movies, Comics, and Culture

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

In this collection of essays, mostly about music, David Hajdu doesn't hold back from expressing strong opinions about artists and their work. But they're informed opinions.

For instance, he doesn't do "irresistibly catchy" singer Taylor Swift any favors by quoting her accurately when she says that Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet "could have been the best love story ever told" if it had had a different ending.

Several themes run through the book, making it more interesting than just a collection of magazine pieces that happened to be available for reprint.

One idea Hajdu comes back to is that rock and roll music doesn't grow up. (That's why it can never die, I guess.) Unfortunately the rockers get older even if the music doesn't, and if they don't learn new things they cease to be interesting. "Rock, at its crude best, is a music of disgrace, anathema to aging . . . gracefully."

Another theme that recurs is the idea of a musical standard that began to be less revered in pop music after the British Invasion. The idea that "old-fashioned popular music was so atrocious in the mid-1950s that Elvis had to come forth for pop's salvation" is merely musical history written by the teenage winners of the generational wars. Hajdu gives examples of how "jazz-oriented popular music reached a creative peak" at the same time rock was born.

Another image that Hajdu finds repeating in popular music is the black man as sexual predator. Louis Armstrong projected an childlike image and pleased everybody. Billy Eckstine, who at one time sold more albums than Frank Sinatra or Bing Crosby, was photographed with ecstatic young white female fans and his career suffered.

I think Hajdu is too quick to accept the notion of substance abuse as a necessary part of the makeup of artists like Anita O'Day. (She makes "enchanting, mercurial music" when drunk, and she "did her greatest, most enduring, . . . work while she was stoned out of her mind..")

From the pre-rock era, Hajdu covers Duke Ellington, Rodgers and Hart, Rodgers and Hammerstein, Sammy Davis, Jr., Bobby Darin, Susannah McCorkle, Leadbelly, Alan Lomax (along with Sting, the closest thing to a villain in the book), Dinah Washington, and Ray Charles. Then come Elvis Costello, Brian Wilson, the White Stripes, Mos Def, and many more.

The main thing I took from this book is that artistic ideas arise in reaction to other artistic ideas, and that the new reaction often isn't new at all. As cult inventor-composer Harry Partch says, "What this age needs more than anything is an effective antidote."

If David Hajdu is right, there will always be an antidote.

While I was interested in some of the subjects in these essays, such as Mos Def, Elvis Costello, Brian Wilson, The White Stripes, Open-Source Remixing, John Lennon, Paul McCartney, Philip Glass, and John Zorn, I found Hajdu's treatment of them too cynical. He bashes all these people in one way or another. In the case of Lennon, he can't find a way to directly bash him so he takes on Lennon's biographer. Perhaps his pieces on Billy Eckstine and Wynton Marsalis are less cutting because they are upper-crust. Even in the cases where I mostly agree with his negative opinion, like his take on the White Stripes, it just seems mean spirited.

He not only disparages the music of these people, but also their motives. Also, he is far off base when it comes to discussing anything technological, Open-Source remixing, Garage Band, "techno" (electronic music). Of course critics and essayists have to tell us when someone has gone down an ugly path, but don't they also have share their love of the music as well, share the joy they get from experiencing a great piece of music, open our ears to unknown masterpieces.