Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Style without substance, April 5, 2010
How do you rate a well-written book that has a very bad plot?
Tobias Hill is obviously a very gifted writer. His command of the language is impressive to say the least. The imagery is beautiful, metaphors are effortless. Just a few subtle strokes is all it takes to set the mood for any given scene.
Unfortunately, all the skills in the world could not save this book. Simply put, it's boring. The narration crawls and meanders pointlessly for far too many pages. There are characters that don't serve any purpose in the plot. There is the setting, Sparta, and non-stop mentioning of its culture, traditions and mysteries, which turn out almost completely irrelevant to the actual plot. The excerpts from the PhD thesis written by the novel's protagonist are interspersed throughout the chapters. These also have nothing to do with the story, although ironically, they are one of the most interesting sections of the novel to read. It takes two thirds of the book to finally build up some semblance of suspense, but then comes the anticlimactic ending, and any hopes for a satisfying resolution of the plot come crashing to the ground.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
The virtues of this book are hard to find, March 10, 2010
Ben Mercer had read Classics and Archaeology at Oxford. His marriage had broken up, and he went to Greece to get away for a while. He worked in a restaurant in an Athens suburb; a fellow student from Oxford turned up at the restaurant and mentioned that he was working on a dig at what was Sparta. Ben thinks that would be ideal work for him - he had always been interested in the Spartans, not least because there is so little direct evidence about them: they left hardly any writing, and archaeological evidence is extremely meagre. Most of what we know about them comes from non-Spartan sources. Ben has been working on a thesis about Sparta, and the novel is interspersed with notes for it, and a grimly pathological, paranoid, cruel and savage society it must have been. He goes to the British School in Athens and gets himself sent to join the dig. He is looking also to work with a group: all his life he has been outside or at the most at the edge of groups. The dynamics of this particular group are both complicated and secretive: an inner circle does not welcome him and for a long time ignores him. Half-way through the book, they seem to accept him, and the scene where he is allowed to accompany them on a hunt to shoot a jackal is one of the few gripping passages in the book. The scenes towards the end of the book, which reveal what the group has been secretive about, are certainly unexpected but don't seem (to me, at any rate) to have any organic `rightness' about them, the supposed link with Spartan ways very tenuous.
I found the book disappointing. For a long time the plot did not seem to be going anywhere. The story is peppered with inconsequential events and inconsequential conversational exchanges. If it were not for the jacket hinting at a dangerous outcome, one does not sense danger for a long time, and I certainly missed the "astonishing grace and power" with which the blurb says the book is written. The characters do not really come alive: they are all seen from the outside, except for Ben and possibly Missy Stanton, the American head of the party who, like Ben, is treated by the group as an outsider. The description of some of the key-scenes is oblique. The dialogue, annoyingly punctuated, consists mostly of laconic one-liners (OK: `laconic' relates to Spartan, but that doesn't make the dialogue any less irritating); and it is sometimes hard work (and at times impossible) to know who is speaking. Sometimes it is not clear who "he" is - and that is really clumsy writing. I suppose that all these features of the style are meant to be as secretive as the story it depicts, but it sure makes for rebarbative reading.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Enviable writing, crappy story, February 12, 2010
I can't deny that T. Hill writes beautifully. Full of metaphors and tightly wound descriptions that paint a brilliant picture. However, his story is ultimately a huge disappointment.
Trying not to say too much here (and give spoilers) I bought this because I was interested in the angle of the mystery that had to do with archeology, history, ancient Greeks. The mystery pulled me all the way through the book. When the reveal was finally close, I suspected Mr. Hill was about to pull a fast one. But I was 4/5th of the way in. Too late to bother putting it down now.
And it was as I had feared. The resolution had nothing to do with what the book was sold to me on. And the hidden plot was as dull as they come. (At least I think so.) Enough said.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|