Customer Reviews


3 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A classic and true courtroom drama
Hermann Goering was a 260 pound morphine-addicted slob when he surrendered to the Americans in May, 1945... a "fat mountain of goo." Yet in the Nuremberg courtroom, Goering had reduced down to 180 pounds, was drug free and put up a brilliant defense. There is no doubt Goering was the star of that courtroom, more than holding his own against the chief American...
Published on July 18, 2000 by Candace Scott

versus
3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Same pat answers
There is nothing revealing in his responses. He denies everything. What value is this? How is it interesting? It isnt . Unless you want to read (over and over )- "I didnt do it", "I cant remember" , "I dont know", "I dont recall seeing that", "I dont remember saying that". Read those quotes 200 times: there-now you have...
Published on February 5, 2002 by CTMV


Most Helpful First | Newest First

7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A classic and true courtroom drama, July 18, 2000
By 
Candace Scott (Lake Arrowhead, CA, USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Highlights from the Direct and Cross-Examination of Herman Goering in the Nuremberg Trial (Classics of the Courtroom Vol. VII) (Spiral-bound)
Hermann Goering was a 260 pound morphine-addicted slob when he surrendered to the Americans in May, 1945... a "fat mountain of goo." Yet in the Nuremberg courtroom, Goering had reduced down to 180 pounds, was drug free and put up a brilliant defense. There is no doubt Goering was the star of that courtroom, more than holding his own against the chief American prosecutor, Robert Jackson.

This book gives some of the highlights of the repartee between the evil but outwardly "genial" Goering and the hapless Jackson. Ultimately, of course, Goering's complicity in Nazi atrocities sentenced him to death, but he was able to electrify the court prior to cheating the hangman. An interesting book, but only for those with the necessary background on the trials and Goering himself.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Same pat answers, February 5, 2002
This review is from: Highlights from the Direct and Cross-Examination of Herman Goering in the Nuremberg Trial (Classics of the Courtroom Vol. VII) (Spiral-bound)
There is nothing revealing in his responses. He denies everything. What value is this? How is it interesting? It isnt . Unless you want to read (over and over )- "I didnt do it", "I cant remember" , "I dont know", "I dont recall seeing that", "I dont remember saying that". Read those quotes 200 times: there-now you have read the book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Cross-examination of a heartless man, May 24, 2000
By 
This review is from: Highlights from the Direct and Cross-Examination of Herman Goering in the Nuremberg Trial (Classics of the Courtroom Vol. VII) (Spiral-bound)
Have you ever wondered how the top ranking German officials tried to squirm out of taking responsibility for the Holocaust. Read how a panel of representatives from four countries grilled Herman Goering, a man largely responsible for many of the atrocities committed during that horrific period of time. Some of the responses on the part of Goering will surprise you. This one is very interesting.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product