Customer Reviews

History Channel: Battle For the Pacific

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(6)

 

 

this game downright sucks. the gameplay is extremely poor, the graphics look like something straight out the ps2 and the sound is very basic. most frustrating aspect of this game apart from what i have already mentioned is the truly cheesy way all the soldier's speak to one another. very unrealistic and tough to believe. if you are looking for a great 1st person shooter i would highly reccommend you avoid this and go for titles like - COD4,MEDAL OF HONOR AIRBORNE,COD3 AND TIMESHIFT (in that order). when i think about the potential the ps3 has as a great gaming console and then play games like battle for the pacific it just makes me wanna throw the machine out the window. thank god for games like COD4 wich is in a class of it's own. this game in my opinion would's even get 1 star but it is compulsory to give a star. activision should hang up their gloves and call it a day. what were you guys thinking when you got this game together ?

To start off, this game lacks any kind of structure at all. Maybe I'm just spoiled with Call of Duty 4 or Medal of Honor but I figured since Activision did such a grreat job with COD4, I would give it a try. Now I'm 40 dollars more poor and I wasted 2 hours of my life. I didn't even finish the game it was that bad. All you do is follow around the same guy that says the same thing. The controls are way off. The AI in the game is horrific. The Japanese do the same thing over and over again. If you play it in surround sound, you'll hear the same explosion over and over again behind you that gets ridiculously annoying. The one saving grace I thought this game would have would be the graphics but even then they are mediocre. If I could give it zero stars or less, I would.The History Channel, Activision, and whomever else were involved with this game should be ashamed. What a joke. Be smart, avoid this dud at all costs!

Every other review has hit the nail on the head. My friend and I played this game for 5 minutes and I have not touched it since. I will no longer be pre-ordering games of this caliber, opting instead to read others reviews first.

Don't bother. There are so many better ways to spend those 40 plus dollars. From the graphics, to the level design, to the sound effects, to almost everything you can imagine, this game is a serious regression to the pre-Medal of Honor series era. Definitely not a game you'd like to see on your PS3 (especially if you just happened to bought the console and are buying your first games.) Such a pitty to see the History Channel -which I love to watch- promoting this game.

Beat this game in 2 days. Not much of a challenge. i did get a good history lesson regarding the war.

I'm so totally disappointed in all respects I can't give it one star but only because I have to in order to add this "review". Not worth even half it's price. No, really ...can I ask History Channel to give me my money back? I will gladly pay the shipping cost off my pocket to send it back for a refund.

Some people think that game sucks i think it is beast get it now now now game =best or beast go with beast

I played this of and for a week or so, it is enjoyable, the only gripe is there too few levals,about 7 in total but for the money what can you exspect,I mean I would be hoping mad if it cost $30.00 or more but for $20.00 it is worth it, buy it for a little releaf no and again.

not a great game, but very cheap, you can't ask as much as cod4 is, because this is not as mush as cod is.

Wow...talk about a bad game...I wanted a Pacific War game so bad after taking a college course on it but this is the best PS3 has to offer...Wow..UTTER DISAPPOINTMENT!!! Not even worth talking about anymore...

DONT BUY...EVER