This is a masterful historical portrait of the whole movement of Calvinism for general readers and scholars alike.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Best Introduction to Date,
By Stephen Hancock "Scholar born 300 years late." (Snellville, GA United States) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)
This review is from: The History and Character of Calvinism (Paperback)
This book has been the standard history of Calvinism since it first came out. McNeill is NOT a calvinist but I don't detect any really biased statements. The narrative is quick and moves from the start of the Swiss reformation through the impact of Calvinism on modern culture. Of course, the last section is the least developed since it was written before the current revival of Calvinism and the rise of Reconstructionism and the "reprint Puritan" phenomenon. Still the best.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very good work on Calvinism,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The History and Character of Calvinism (Paperback)
This is a very good work that keeeps your attention. Very well research work, that covers the history of Calvinism. If you want to understand the history of the reformed Calvinist view this is one of the books you should read. Its worth the money, and your time.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Soul searching,
By Yaakov (James) Mosher (Connecticut, USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The History and Character of Calvinism. (Hardcover)
An insightful history of Christianity's most misunderstood branch. The most fruitful portion of John T. McNeill's "The History & Character of Calvinism" is its reckoning of contemporary problems. The book's Part IV - "Calvinism and Modern Issues" - should not be missed.
McNeill's 1954 work contains a Calvinist condemnation of South African apartheid that was ahead of its time. The book was published the same year Daniel Malan, a leading architect of apartheid, left the South African premiership. Malan's membership in the Dutch Reform Church ministry is troubling to McNeill and the author wishes to set the religious record straight. Apartheid, while a personal preference rooted in natural law (people do better with their own kind), is self-defeating as a government policy. To those who would use Jean Calvin's doctrine of the elect to buttress apartheid and other elitist/separatist institutions, McNeill trots out the real Calvin - the great reformer himself said that only G-d knows who the elect are. Thus for man to judge who the elect are and create social mechanisms based on that judgment is anti-G-dly. McNeill is again soaring to spiritual heights when he laments the fragmentation of Calvinism and the Christian Church generally. The author goes so far as to posit that Calvinist churches may come to reinstitute episcopacy (bishops). I dissent here. Jesus said "with G-d all things are possible" but Calvinist bishops?! Bosh! But that doesn't mean Calvinists can't be inspired by bishops. The recent popes/bishops of Rome have put their church in the vanguard of the pro-life and economic rethinking movements. Calvinists should join in. That's what McNeill means when he writes about Christian "unity." Cooperation is probably a better term. McNeill wisely observes that the spirit of Calvinism is more directed at bringing about overall social betterment than promoting components such as economic individualism. When weighing Max Weber's thesis that Protestantism spreads rational habits of mind which then spreads capitalism, don't leave off the scales Calvin's view of justice - "To prove ourselves to be G-d's children let us beware that we lend our helping hand to such as are wrongfully persecuted, and that according to the ability that G-d giveth us do we succor such as are trodden under foot." (p. 425). Old enemies of Calvinism rise from the dead in McNeill's pages. Well-disguised doctrines such as the Erastianism that forms the outlines of contemporary church/state relations and even manages to fuel strife in the Islamic world are unmasked by our scholarly author. To understand big government as well as the bent of social movements toward government affirmation (and vigilante actions by some of the spurned) it is useful to consider how Erastianism mixed with republicanism and mass democracy. Thomas Hobbes, author of "Leviathan," was a secular Erastian, McNeill notes (p. 354), and his self-fulfilling worldview is thoroughly stamped on our times. Changes in forms of worship are an interesting area addressed by McNeill. My own view is things such as kneeling and the handshake of peace could be imported from the Roman Church with positive effect. Kneeling during communion would be inappropriate based on Calvin's teachings but kneeling during The Lord's Prayer would bring sorely needed humility. Sign-of-peace handshakes might have prevented the destruction of my native Massachusetts/New England. Had the Irish been greeted with outstretched hands of peace and friendly displays of humility instead of Yankee pride New England might still be thriving today. Instead the Irish were treated as a servant class. Disrespected, they turned to boss politics, crime, social theatrics, and Kennedy worship. With other factors contributing, New England (Boston most notably) went from the cradle of liberty to a graveyard of socialism. Tragedy of tragedies! The Romanists and others should take from the Congregationalists the meeting house forum. This public voicing of burdens and calls for prayer promotes family feeling within the assembly and would strengthen cooperation across religious boundaries. The long-delayed discussion about breaking down government to a more human size (as advocated by the great diplomat and Calvinist George Kennan) will start in the meeting house format - mark my words. In this, the 500th year since Calvin's birth, we should utilize McNeill's fine book and point ourselves toward renewal and reunion that is internal and thus the most real. United Church of Christ and the rest of the Congregationalist/Presbyterian/Reform family need not make any organized shows with the leaders of the Orthodox and Roman churches. We should respect what G-d has wrought. In studying Judaism's Holy Torah, we learn that G-d's punishments always contain correctives within them. In analyzing the dispersion of the Jews and the breakup of Christianity we should consider the Tower of Babel. In all three cases scattering was meted out because people were misusing unity by aggrandizing themselves and using lavish public ceremonies as a substitute for faith and good works. God's great gift was a "punishment" of congregationalism marked by different languages and customs. Let us respect that but not fall into the trap of insularity. Ultimately, McNeill calls us to follow the teaching of Saint Paul - "The real Jew is the person who is a Jew on the inside." Those words are from Romans, the epistle that convinced Calvin to become a Protestant (humorous that a document called "Romans" lead Calvin out of the Roman Church). Calvin, following Paul, teaches us through his "faith alone" exposition that the inside must be properly aligned for spiritual salvation and for human actions to do more good than harm. John McNeill's "History & Character of Calvinism" is a helpful reminder of what present and future generations, with their ever increasing focus on outward appearances and identity politics, can learn from Christianity properly understood.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|