Buy New
$35.67
Qty:1
  • List Price: $45.00
  • Save: $9.33 (21%)
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
A History of Economic The... has been added to your Cart
Trade in your item
Get a $2.00
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

A History of Economic Theory: Classic Contributions, 1720-1980 (Softshell Books) Paperback – October 1, 1994


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$35.67
$32.99 $15.00
$35.67 FREE Shipping. In Stock. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.


Frequently Bought Together

A History of Economic Theory: Classic Contributions, 1720-1980 (Softshell Books) + A History of Economic Thought
Price for both: $53.01

Buy the selected items together
  • A History of Economic Thought $17.34

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Softshell Books
  • Paperback: 592 pages
  • Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press (October 1, 1994)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0801849764
  • ISBN-13: 978-0801849763
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.3 x 1.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,176,103 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

Well organized. Its chapters on monetary topics and marginalist writers are balanced and informative. Many economists neglected in other histories are here given their due... As a convenient desk reference, this book has much to offer.

(Journal of Economic History)

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 10 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on July 23, 1999
Format: Paperback
The only book I've seen, outside the Palgrave reference book, that gives brief vignettes on different economists and their schools. Author does not mince words, writes strong, and gets to the point. A nice one-volume tome. Also includes some mathematics, which is nice.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
10 of 14 people found the following review helpful By Michael Emmett Brady on March 25, 2005
Format: Paperback
Niehans appears to be unable to offer an objective assessment of many of the economists that he covers in a series of short essays in this book.Basically,Niehans views the history of economic thought as if it were composed of two different kinds of economists,the good guys who believe in Say's Law as a general covering law,which Niehans defines as the postulate that in the long run price adjustments alone will always guarantee the full employment of all resources(resource scarcity) excluding necessary slack and down time for repair,maintenance, retooling,rest,etc.,and the bad guys,who don't accept Say's law as the general case,but only as a special case operating only when economies are on the boundaries of both their static(short run)and dynamic(long run)production possibilities curves with an optimal stock of capital goods.The bad guys are the mercantilists,Sir James Steuart,Sismondi,Malthus,Marx,the laterJohn S Mills, the later Marshall,Veblen,and Keynes.The good guys are Smith,Bentham,James Mills,Say,Ricardo,Senior,Pigou,Robertson,Kalecki,Friedman and Modigliani.I will concentrate on covering some of the errors of ommission and commission made, with respect to the work of Keynes in the General Theory(1936),by Niehans throughout his book.The first incorrect assessment of Keynes's work is the claim that Keynes based his model in the GT on the assumption of rigid money wages(See Niehans,pp.114,350,353,355,356,471 for a few examples).Nowhere in the GT does Keynes assume money wages are rigid except as a simplification in the early chapters of the GT.Keynes assumed that short run money wages were held constant.Note also that prices are fully flexible in all chapters of the GT.Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?