Qty:1
  • List Price: $26.95
  • Save: $2.13 (8%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Book shows minor use. Cover and Binding have minimal wear and the pages have only minimal creases. A tradition of southern quality and service. All books guaranteed at the Atlanta Book Company. Our mailers are 100% recyclable.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice Paperback – February 1, 1991

ISBN-13: 978-0807730539 ISBN-10: 080773053X

Buy New
Price: $24.82
11 New from $24.80 23 Used from $9.38 1 Collectible from $53.96
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$24.82
$24.80 $9.38
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Frequently Bought Together

A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice + Learning Science and the Science of Learning: Science Educators' Essay Collection - PB158X
Price for both: $50.18

Buy the selected items together
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Image
Teacher Supplies
Browse our Teacher Supplies store, with everything teachers need to educate students and expand their learning.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 269 pages
  • Publisher: Teachers College Press (February 1, 1991)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 080773053X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0807730539
  • Product Dimensions: 9 x 6.2 x 0.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 14.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #583,053 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

George E. DeBoer is deputy director of Project 2061, a long-term science education reform effort of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), and he is Professor Emeritus of Educational Studies at Colgate University where he was active on the faculty from 1974-2004. He also served as program director at the National Science Foundation from 2000-2002. His primary writing interests are science education policy, the history of science education, and student assessment in science. In addition to his books, he has authored numerous papers and book chapters on these subjects. He also directed a large-scale assessment development project at AAAS, which resulted in a website with over 600 science assessment items and reports on what U.S. students know in science that are free to the public. The website can be accessed at http://assessment.aaas.org.

He is a native of Midland Park, New Jersey and a graduate of Eastern Christian High School. He received his higher education in the Midwest, receiving a BA in 1966 from Hope College, an MAT in Biochemistry and Science Teaching in 1968 from the University of Iowa, and a PhD in Science Education in 1972 from Northwestern University. He lives in Washington, DC and Key Biscayne, FL.

Customer Reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
1
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

6 of 7 people found the following review helpful By Gavin W. Fulmer on February 16, 2006
Format: Paperback
DeBoer presents good detail about the history of key ideas in science education. It primarily focuses on the field as it has evolved in the US, but he does bring in information about early influences from Europe. It's very enlightening to think that many of the "reform" movements of the last 30 years are reincarnations of arguments from almost 100 years ago. That being said, the book isn't great. I think DeBoer's writing style is dry and at times clunky. You'll really want to know this information to get through it all.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Bill Zoellick on September 16, 2012
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
One of the complicated things about science education is that there are so many reasons to do it. Because time in school is limited, focusing on one outcome often means paying less attention to another. We might want children to like science, we might want them to go deep to understand the structure of a specific scientific discipline, we might want them to get a broad understanding across many areas of science so that they are scientifically literate, we might want them to have a good idea of how science works and how it helps figure things out, or we might want them to focus on socially relevant problem such as climate change. Then, even if we agree on a couple of these objectives, there are different ways of getting there.

DeBoer tells the story of how scientists, education theorists, and teachers in the U.S. have negotiated their way between the different goals and different approaches to teaching science over the past 150 years or so. He has distilled a great deal of original source material into a very readable 241 pages. There is great value in being able to survey shifts in science education thinking over such a broad span of time in a relatively short book. The reader comes away with a sense of how this negotiation between scientists and educators works, and of why it sometimes seems that science education revisits the same issues over time.

Like others involved in working with science teachers, I am currently thinking about the Next Generation Science Standards that are being developed from the Framework for K-12 Science Education.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again