Buy Used
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Ships from AMAZON in SHRINK WRAP! In "Very Good" condition. As pictured with DJ. Slight bend to book due to improper storage. Pages are crisp/clean. Price clipped DJ. Some shelf/edge/corner wear to DJ/book. Shipped with Delivery Confirmation.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The History of Postmodern Architecture Hardcover – April 13, 1988

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
$60.58 $0.85

Best Books of the Year
See the Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

In response to Mies van der Rohe's famous dictum that "less is more," Robert Venturi said "less is a bore," implying that the pure, unembellished architectural style in the modernist tradition of Mies, Gropius, Le Corbusier et al. had reached a dead end. The decisive turn from modernism to postmodernism, notes the author of this provocative survey, occurred around 1960 as architects were again designing buildings that expressed meaning as well as function. Klotz, director of the German Architecture Museum in Frankfurt, first traces the progress of modernism from the 1920s to 1960. He then discusses in depth the works of Venturi, Charles Moore, James Stirling, Aldo Rossi, Hans Hollein and many other postmodernists. Central to his thesis is the idea that postmodern architecture has a fictional contentunlike modern architecture, it refers to events outside itself. Illustrations.
Copyright 1988 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

Renowned architectural historian Klotz, director of the German Architecture Museum in Frankfurt, has produced an important book. Other surveys of postmodern architecturee.g., Charles Jencks's Language of Post-Modern Architecture (Rizzoli, 1984; 4th ed.) and Paolo Portoghesi's Postmodern ( LJ 5/15/84)lack the serious, scholarly historical viewpoint that Klotz elaborates here. Klotz avoids both polemic and bias in his thoughtfulat times too thoughtfulaccount of major trends in America and Europe in the past 20 years. Unfortunately, his work suffers from a tendency to go for depth and density over clarity and ease of expression, lifting it beyond the ken of the general public. Peter Kaufman, Suffolk Community Coll., Selden, N.Y.
Copyright 1988 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 478 pages
  • Publisher: The MIT Press (April 13, 1988)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0262111233
  • ISBN-13: 978-0262111232
  • Product Dimensions: 5.9 x 1 x 11 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 4.7 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,006,734 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Important Information

Example Ingredients

Example Directions

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Elie G. Haddad on January 26, 2007
Format: Paperback
Klotz's work offers definitely a better survey of Postmodernism than Jencks' multiple texts and revisions on the subject. Klotz's scholarly work also shows the continuities rather than the radical break between Postmodernism and Modernism. How else can we explain Aalto's later works, Corbusier's Ronchamp, and the work of BBPR in Italy? The critical revisions of dogmatic modernism were already in the air around 1950, and many architects can hardly be labelled in one camp or another.
This is what makes this history book still worth reading today. It is rich in details and theoretical insights into the developments of architecture in the Twentieth century.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again