A History of South Africa, Third Edition [Paperback]

Leonard Thompson (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: March 1, 2001

A leading scholar of South Africa provides a fresh and penetrating exploration of that country's history, from the earliest known human inhabitation of the region to the present, focusing primarily on the experiences of its black inhabitants. For this third edition, Leonard Thompson adds two new chapters that describe the transfer of power and the new South Africa under the presidencies of Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

This magisterial history throws a floodlight on South Africa's current crisis by examining the past. The absurdity of the apartheid philosophy of racial separatism is underscored by the author's argument (backed with convincing research material) that the genes of the nation's first hunter-gatherers are inextricably mixed with those of modern blacks and whites. The Dutch colonial invaders felt no sense of kinship with the original inhabitants, however: their arrival brought slavery and disease, pulverizing chiefdoms and pastoral communities. From the outset, white settler society was dependent on the labor of slaves and indigenous peoples. Thompson, a specialist in South African history, expertly relates how the Afrikaners--still poor, scattered and disunited in 1854--threw off Dutch and British hegemony to forge their own national identity, forcibly uprooting and relocating millions of blacks. Although the author deems president Frederik W. de Klerk "like his predecessors . . . wedded to fixed racial categories," he sees signs of hope in blacks' increasing economic power and the student revolt against pedagogical brainwashing in the state-controlled schools.
Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From School Library Journal

YA-- A penetrative probe into South Africa's memorable history. Beginning with the earliest aborigines of the area and concluding with the up-to-date happenings, Thompson examines primarily the encounters of blacks. The text is basic for any reader who wishes to comprehend the historical patterns that preface the struggles that seethe and boil in this country. A careful, reliable book for student research. --Mike Printz, Topeka West High School, KS
Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 384 pages
• Publisher: Yale University Press; 3rd edition (March 1, 2001)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0300087764
• ISBN-13: 978-0300087765
• Product Dimensions: 7.6 x 4.7 x 1.1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 12 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (22 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #18,750 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • #3 in Books > History > Africa > South Africa

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

73 of 75 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Factual, and complete, December 11, 2000

By 

Scott W. - See all my reviews

This review is from: A History of South Africa: Revised Edition (Paperback)

"I did not think it was possible for a white person to write a history of South Africa which a black South African would find to be a fair and accurate account of a beautiful land and its people. Leonard Thompson has disabused me of that notion. His is a history that is both accurate and authentic, written in a delightful literary style." -- Archbishop Desmond Tutu

This truly is an incredible historical masterpiece. The account begins with two chapters dedicated to the early Africans before European intervention, and ends with the fall of apartheid and a new beginning for South Africa. It is a easy to read, and is a real page-turner.

The reason I picked this book up was I wanted to dig beneath the surface of the country's history. I learned about the two Afrikaner Republics - The Orange Free State, and the Transvaal Republic - and how they were incorporated, reluctantly, into the Union of South Africa at the beginning of the 20th century. The detail is incredible, and not boring in the least.

I highly recommend this book - especially for those who need to do research reports on apartheid, or South African history in general. Overall - and excellent, excellent history book!

57 of 64 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Not good enough for a History Book, June 16, 2006

By 

Book Nut - See all my reviews

This review is from: A History of South Africa, Third Edition (Paperback)

I very much looked forward to receiving this book through the mail, due to the tons of praise which people expressed for it. I am however very disappointed. I have only read the first few pages (including the first one which quotes the multitude of praise) with emphasis on the summary/chronology of South African history. I am a South African, and I find it littered with inaccuracies which SHOULD NOT be present in a history book. It is painfully obvious that the book was written by a foreigner. Examples: The Boer war becomes "The war between the whites". I would have liked to see the Rand Revolt mentioned by name. Botha becomes prime minister. Botha who? Pik? PW? A newcomer to SA history should not have to guess at such things. 1981-1988 South African forces invade Angola. Uh....NO. SA started incursions into Angola in 1976. Since this is a history of SA, I will point out that a quick scan of the book reveals no more detail around these events, yet he takes a cheap shot at the Afrikaner government by making it sound as though they willy-nilly went into Angola for the sake of oppressing people. It seems that the author opted to avoid explaining the historical facts behind these VERY important events. What the reader does not know, is that Fidel Castro through this period of time circulated 350 000 (if I remember correctly) Cuban soldiers through Angola to infiltrate southern Africa with communism, through a war sponsored by Soviet money and state-of-the-art military equipment and training. The South Africans were responding to this threat to avoid the spread of communism into the region (it is rumored that the CIA condoned this until the withdrawal from Vietnam). Simultaneously civil wars in other southern African countries were tied in to this, as well as Soviet military training of ANC members such as Thabo Mbeki and others. The events surrounding the incursions into Angola has tremendous complexities tied into it that had a direct cause and effect role in the interaction between the government, apartheid era crackdowns, and African political organizations. That the author did not discuss these influential details in a modern history book is a scandal. He chooses to refer to a province we officially call KwaZulu-Natal, as KwaZulu. Overall the first few pages do not bode well for the rest of the book, but I will report back when I'm done reading it.

This is the report-back:
After reading the book I realized that my initial harsh criticism was borne from an expectation of having purchased a detailed history book. After realizing that it was not, I eased my expectations somewhat despite the errors. Overall the book is a readable but superficial summary of South African history, and anyone who wants to claim that they have a balanced understanding of South Africa's history cannot do so without having read further than this source. The book was clearly written for an audience (perhaps at freshman university level) who need a first-order introduction to SA history. In this sense the book is fairly well written but omissions of essential events and several factual errors prompt me to rate it 3.5 stars. I rate it 2 stars however, because this book is marketed as THE authoritative book on SA history, as the praise by Desmond Tutu and the title of the book misleadingly suggests. It is nothing of the kind (at least I hope it's not the best there is!!!!!). I think the praise this book received is outdated and inappropriate for today's day and age and the title should read "A summary of SA history". Since the author seems to update the book as time goes on, by adding chapters, he cannot be excused for not filling in the gaps, correcting errors in previous chapters, and adding details. The book therefore seems to propagate the gaps in recorded SA history instead of aspiring to become an accurate and detailed authoritative reference as time goes on. It's a pity.

One more comment: At least one reviewer has advised to take the last chapter with a grain of salt since it appears too pessimistic to him. I couldn't disagree more! The last chapter is - apart from a few opinionated (would be subtle to foreigners)statements by the author in terms of seemingly continuing to make Africans the underdogs and Caucasians the antagonists - factual, and an accurate (and perhaps even understated) recording of the dismal deterioration of SA society and the incompetence of the government that played out from 94-2000. The continuing trend of these events can clearly be seen in everyday South African news up to this day.

25 of 26 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Thorough and factual, except for the end ..., March 13, 2005

By 

Pri$m (Johannesburg, South Africa (temporarily Amherst, MA)) - See all my reviews

This review is from: A History of South Africa, Third Edition (Paperback)

I found every part of this book, except for the last chapter, to be thorough, even-handed and well written. As a South African with a strong interest in our history seeking to flesh out an incomplete knowledge of it, this is the best and most complete source I have found so far.

The third edition contains two new chapters: the first one describes the negotiation process and the transition to the new government, and the second is a description of the state of the New South Africa. The transition chapter is excellent -- it is insightful, fascinating and highly relevant to South Africa today.

However, I found the final chapter of this book to be badly written, overly pessimistic and, in places, dangerously subjective. Part of this is because it was written in 2000, and doesn't include some of the serious progress made since then -- for example, it mentions the sharp drop in the Rand's value in 1999 and 2000, but not its subsequent strong and equally rapid recovery in 2003 and 2004. This leaves the impression that the Mbeki government is doing a terrible job, whereas as of now (early 2005) it is doing relatively well.

However, some (not much, but a little bit) of the material in the final chapter contains the kind of alarmist statements that South Africans have come to expect (and learned to ignore) from certain (predominantly conservative) sections of the popular press, and are inappropriate in a book that claims to be accurate and factual. I suspect that Bishop Tutu might wish to have the glowing review he gave to the first edition removed from the cover of the third.

Nevertheless, provided the reader is willing to to be take the final chapter with a grain of salt, the book lives up to its billing and deserves its extremely positive reviews.