This is a concise paperback that details the ethos Hitler followed during his reign. A brief chronology is offered and elements of eugenics, anti-semitism, living space, war, Darwinism, and most of all struggle. Struggle is a constant theme throughout the book. Hitler's view on the African Negro is also highlighted which is not mentioned in many other books and thought it added another dimension to his views on the master race. His ideas on socialism and nationalism all point to survival and evolution of the Aryan race. This definition deviates from other views on socialism where public goods and welfare predominate. It was interesting hearing the social programs and annual programs for helping the poor and stew Sundays. These programs are also uniquely discussed in this book compared to others motivating a sense of community and charity among the German people. These programs of course occurred early in his tenure as Chancellor. His preponderance for the convenient lie is also a major theme in this book. Lies were opportunistic in advancing his doctrine. For example, the Germans in Czech are suffering boosting national support for invading that country in 1939 and coming to their aid. Propaganda was paramount to effecting his policies; were they lies or were they moral to him because the ends justified the means. It is clear that he preached to the German people the volk is superior to the individual in preservation of the former and war is necessary to progress and evolution of the German people. All of his motives appear to support the goal of preserving the Aryan race. If the ill and decrepid are using up funds that could be used to support the war effort, they must be sacraficed for the volk. If any people are interfering with might of the volk they must be sacraficed, i.e. Jews. It was interesting reading the definition of how a Jew was defined, looking toward the number of grandparents and synogogue involvement, seemingly unscientific. The fact that initially Hitler did not purport extermination of the Jews until it was evident deportation was no longer viable is also consistent with other publications. His views on living space were in line with survival of the fittest in that he felt land is for the taking when the stronger people defeat the weaker and he also feared a China scenario where running out of living space would depress the volk. Although he thought the Japanese were sub par to the Aryan race, he was flexible on his ideological policies when he needed to be. this was also the case with the German mother. In one instance he purported the main purpose of women was reproduction; however, when labor was needed to support the war, he altered his policies. In April 1945, when it was clear the end was near, true to his doctrine and interviews from persons in the bunker he accepted that a stronger people(s) had defeated a weaker one. The laws of nature prevailed. He deferred his individualism role as leader of the people to the volk in defeat, he did not act to evacuate people from Berlin. Was this his own flawed character or was he kneeling to his own doctrine of national socialism? Both may be true. A rich source of knowledge and philosophy.