90 of 102 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
MEIN FLOPF, July 28, 2006
This review is from: Hitler's Second Book: The Unpublished Sequel to Mein Kampf (Bk. 2) (Hardcover)
It was apparently in 1961 that a book alleged to be the second literary effort of Hitler was published in Munich. I recall seeing a very small news item around then to that effect in one of the British papers, and I recall the statement in that same item that the work had achieved no significant sales. As it started, so it seems to have continued. It surprises me still that a document of so much historical significance has had to wait more than 40 years for its first English edition, and I naturally wondered whether it could really be genuine under the circumstances. Apparently it is, but it still seems to be avoiding the best-seller lists, and I can't recall a great deal of critical discussion of it either. Nothing that I have seen has cast doubt on the work's authenticity, which I am therefore taking on trust. In attempting a review I am mainly concerned with the actual content of the volume. However in awarding a rating I have given regard only to the editorial work, and I imagine it would go without saying that this rating does not reflect any endorsement of the poisonous doctrines of Adolf Hitler.
The editor at least addresses the basic questions that I wanted to see addressed, namely -
Is the authorship firmly established? Is this (seemingly untitled) book definitely a later work than Mein Kampf? Why was it not published in Hitler's lifetime? He also ponders earnestly the question why an English edition should be published. Because most of us struggle a bit with German would be sufficient answer for me. The likelihood that this text might be inflammatory nowadays would have struck me as nil in any case even if I had not known about its poor sales record. As for the other questions, Weinberg's arguments are the only side of the case that I know, but they are at least plausible. His credentials as a scholar are not familiar to me, but he has written extensively about Hitler and any criticism of his work that I have spotted reads to me like standard academic niggling and infighting rather than anything that undermines my confidence in his conclusions here. As for internal evidence of authorship, I can assure you that the style possesses a conspicuous and frightful familiarity.
The book reads easily and fluently in English, and the translator Krista Smith has to get a great deal of credit for that. Whatever else he may have been, Hitler was supremely articulate and the text is not as prolix or repetitious as some comment might suggest. The reason he suppressed the book at the time of writing was apparently that it put some of his foreign-policy cards face upwards on the table, and he was not ready at the time to do that. We would have known about Lebensraum, but the blatancy of his endorsement of territorial conquest simply for the purpose of protecting the German food-supply is rather breathtaking. One of the things I slightly regret about the failure of this book to arouse general interest is that I would have liked to see some proper analysis by qualified economists of the quaintest economic reasoning I have ever read in my life. A strong nation, one gathers, must not rely on trade, imports, exports and such like to feed itself but must be self-sufficient in that regard. It would have made for a dull Speisekarte if it had even been achieved, I must say, but of course Hitler was vegetarian and his favourite gastronomic treat was Spiegeleier mit Kartoffeln. The rest of the text is mainly concerned with his attitude towards other European nations, France being seen as a traditional and irreconcilable foe, Italy and even England as potential allies. A surprising amount of space, and an even more astonishing level of emotion, is directed on to the strictly contemporary issue of the ownership of the South Tyrol, which he is happy enough to concede to Italy, at least pro tem, in the interests of securing an alliance with fascist Italy under his admired Mussolini. One reason for this unexpected emphasis is his concern to attack the enemy within, the bourgeois democratic traitors who were full of indignation over the trifling matter of the South Tyrol but failed to see the pressing need for large-scale territorial expansion.
Indeed Hitler is nothing if not candid in this work about the prime importance of carrying the sword to ensure his precious breathing-space. Economic superiority was in his view futile - a robust and healthy Germany should not shirk the task, staringly necessary to him, of suppression of its neighbours by force of arms, the basic reasoning being that a nation that is not the hammer will end up being the anvil. The familiar enemies and bogies are paraded too - Jews, Marxists, freemasons, pacifists and the weak-kneed campaigners for a restoration of the pre-1914 borders of Germany, which seemed to Hitler a paltry substitute for the massive expansion of his dreams. The expression is articulate to say the least, the phraseology often vivid, and the racial perceptions, taken unquestioningly as fact, foul beyond description. The reasoning is specious although the insights are often acute and even brilliant, but the book is past its sell-by date for some very bad and sinister reasons. The ugly and unreasoned racism has not really gone away, and indeed is a deeply ingrained European characteristic. This book is no longer dangerous only because it needs no Hitler to put the message across to those who are happy to take it on board without him.
The edition fulfils what is expected of it quite well so far as I can see, except that the proof-reading leaves a little to be desired (notably a rash of misprints on pp 89/90), the frequent insertion of '[sic]' is fussy and excessive, and some of the words inserted to complete the sense of the unrevised text are occasionally in the wrong place. Necessary as history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
62 of 70 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The historical truth of this book, October 17, 2005
This review is from: Hitler's Second Book: The Unpublished Sequel to Mein Kampf (Bk. 2) (Hardcover)
After reading the reviews of this book I think serious history buffs need to know the history, the facts of this book. Weinberg discovered the original manuscript while working with captured war documents in Wash. D.C. after the war. It was published in German by Bavaria who owned the copyright to such things in 1961 with Weinbergs notes and introduction. Grove Press with Telford Taylor pirated it and issued a very poor translation and even used Weinbergs notes. Put the 2 books together and you will see that. That book quickly bombed as scholars and serious history buffs recognized the poor translation. Weinberg's Hitler's Second Book is a top notched translation of Hitler's words and contain well researched notes and introduction by Weinberg and this edition is being used by schools and Universities ---the pirated edition never was. Thus far, Bavaria has not given anyone or any country permission to translate this manuscript besides Weinberg. If one wants to compare this translation, the only true way is to get the original German edition. Otherwise, trust the professional literary reviews.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A important historical document, March 20, 2006
This review is from: Hitler's Second Book: The Unpublished Sequel to Mein Kampf (Bk. 2) (Hardcover)
This book is intersting in the sense that it helps us understand better the views of Hitler in the way of foreign policy, especially towards the United States. Altough the book was published in french in the 1960's as L'Expansion du Reich, this edition offers great footnotes by Gerhard L. Weinberg that help us better understand the historical elements developped by Hitler in his manuscript.
While this book might not appeal to the general public, it is defenetly worth purchasing for people intersted in the history of fascism, nazism, Hitler (see also Hitler by Kershaw) or Germany.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No