Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
48 of 55 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
1's too good;even an utter idiot wouldn't find it delightful, March 24, 2000
I totally agree with previous reviewer on all points. (I could not bring myself to rating this DISGUSTING GARBAGE, I mean 1 is too good for it! ) Let me just re-state those points... Firstly, please, pay attention that all of the men mentioned in this book are already dead. Secondly, I do believe that all of the men mentioned in the book were "more or less gay" (and I do not mean bisexual...I mean those men, who ARE GAY, but can't fully admit it, even to themselves). However, I DO NOT SEE how and why would they be so frank with this pompous tiny man... Tony Perkins, for example, was never known for his good demeanor, especially towadrs journalists. Thirdly, author's complete lack of a writer's imagination is obvious, because ASOLUTELY ALL MEN SOUND ALIKE (now, who in their sound state of mind would believe that Tony Perkins, Cary Grant, James Coco, and say Liberace were so much alike in their personal manner of speaking and their opinions on various subjects? ) IT IS ABSURD. Last but not least, throughout all of the so-called conversations, the author keeps interrupting people that he is "conversing" with, just to show how smart he is or to insert yet another sleazy piece of gossip. Had he really done that, I believe, he would have been immediately shut off, if not by Cary Grant, then definitely by Tony Perkins, for doing that. However, the bit about 80-year-old Cary Grant putting moves on the author absolutely takes the cake among all other absurd and disgusting insinuations, I have read so far about gay men in Hollywood. After all that Grant had lived and seen, I am sure he would have had much better taste in men, if in nothing else... Anyway, this book is worst than any of today's tabloid rubbish. Therefore, I have two questions...Firstly, Why on earth anyone would want to publish that?(Answer: For money, of course, and that is sad... sad that we, as readers, get to read it). Secondly, is it even possible (apparently, it is! ) for the author to claim that such intimate conversations supposedly happened in the first place, and, then, to publish them (breaking, again, the supposed confidentiality) without any authorization from people mentioned and without any legal repercussions from the "victims" side? But, then again, those men are dead, so the garbage just keeps coming our way...
|
|
|
15 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Laughable, but not in a good way., March 23, 2006
WOW. This guy should be ashamed to present this as even being remotely journalistic. No sources, no tapes and such outlandish, unbelievable dialogue that you are embarrassed for the writer. Cary Grant at 80 came on to this guy? Its so ridiculous its funny. Just one of the many obvious personal sexual fantasies the author shares with the reader. I'm sure many of these people he supposedly interviewed were gay or bi-sexual, but it's not proven in this book. If anything it's disproven by the mere fact that the author has such little to back him up that he has to resort to faking interviews and offering anonymous sources.
The most obvious example is the Cary Grant interview, but the rest are just as blatant. There is no way a private person like Grant would speak to a known liar like Boze, let alone discuss his homoosexuality with him, when he had sued Chevy Chase around the time of the interview for calling him a fag.
The book is a waste of money and time. There are great biographies out there that contain substantiated facts rather than gossip and lies.
|
|
|
16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
More garbage from Boze, December 1, 2005
As a journalist myself, I can testify that Cary Grant never gave interviews, even for articles about him. When he HAD to give an interview, he managed never to say anything. So you can write off the Grant interview right away. No conceivable way would he EVER EVER have spoken to Boze Hadleigh. In fact, I can't see how anyone would.
Someone mentioned their curiosity as to why Hadleigh's interview subjects are always dead. Uh, libel laws. He doesn't want to be sued. As he surely would have been - just look at what Cary Grant did when Chevy Chase called him "queer." And here's Cary, talking to good old Boze and coming onto him. Right.
Boze joins Hector Arce and Charles Higham in that wonderful world of - hey, they're dead, let's say anything we want - even fake an interview. And don't ever forget their liberal use of anonymous sources.
We know in many cases that the men allegedly spoken to by Hadleigh were indeed gay. Some we suspected. Now, did these people speak to Hadleigh - knowing full well what he's about? Perhaps some did and just as perhaps, some didn't.
Why we can't love and admire these people for what they brought to us with their work, I don't know. Instead, people like Boze try desperately to out actors like Tyrone Power (I bring this up because Hadleigh works Romero mercilessly on the subject) and manage to overlook first person accounts of affairs with him, such as Mai Zetterling's "All Those Tomorrows," Lana Turner's "The Lady, The Legend, the Truth," Linda Christian's "Linda: My Own Story," and Gene Tierney's autobiography. But why listen to those liars when we have BOZE??? Before Boze, there was Whisper magazine, a Confidential ripoff, and they outed Ty -as fooling around with Anita Ekberg while he was married to Linda Christian. Strange, isn't it - Confidential would have outed Rock Hudson if his studio hadn't traded another story. Odd they never felt compelled to do that to Ty...hmm...Again, Power may have been bisexual, and I do think in Hollywood, there was a lot of that going around. But why tell Boze about it.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|