| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Adrian Gilbert answers his critics,
By
This review is from: The Holy Kingdom: The Quest for the Real King Arthur (Paperback)
I have read through the reviews of "The Holy Kingdom", most favourable and some not. It does not surprise me, however, that our critics are vitriolic in their attacks. I have seen for myself how Wilson and Blackett have been the subject of character assasination for daring to lift the lid on what is still a sensitive subject: the Arthurian legacy.I would just like to put the record straight on one or two issues. Wilson and Blackett may be difficult individuals at times (they have plenty of reason) but they are neither fools nor charlatans. If I had thought they were I would have had nothing to do with them. They are two of the most original thinkers I have ever met and they deserve more recognition for their outstanding research. I myself have been criticised for the style of the book. I could, of course, have written it as an academic treatise but the nature of this work and the detailed arguments needing to be presented would have been daunting for most readers. Instead I have written it in the form of a modern day Arthurian Quest. The difference is that this is not fiction: it is fact. Everything happened as I have described it. Years later and after further research, I see that this was but the tip of the ice-berg. In time I shall have to write more on the subject! One other thing: please note that there is more than one author called Adrian Gilbert. I do not write books on warfare, sniping, tanks or anything else of the ilk. My work is mainly concerned with Hermetic mysteries. If you would like to know more, visit my website at www.adriangilbert.co.uk or join the discussion forum I have setup on yahoo. You can reach this through the "forum" link on my website.
13 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A blatant pack of lies, but fun to read if you don't mind!,
This review is from: The Holy Kingdom: Quest for the Real King Arthur (Paperback)
I was intrigued at first, for the comments were mysterious--was something indeed discovered here? The writers next to Gilbert have made some interesting points about the sorry squandering of Welsh and British historical inheritance, which I am the first to concede. But Gilbert has been lulled into believed that his co-authors indeed found some historical sources with an explosive discovery--nothing is less true! They use Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Welsh Bruts for real history, something one of course cannot possibly do with later medieval writings! Most of these sources are complete fantasies (though with interesting original scraps), but the authors completely ignore or denounce accredited earlier sources who just happen to state things differently, as willful pro-Roman frauds. Thus they fantasize that the Romans never occupied Britain as a whole, that they built Hadrian's Wall for the benifit of 'the Royal House of Britain', that it was the Celts who really built all the Roman Roads, that the Roman Legions were a 'ragtag band of indisciplined murderers', etc, etc. This is too much for anyone with but a scrap of historical knowledge, something I must conclude the main author does not possess to judge from his own account. Sometimes fun to read, but only if you're interested in the process of unraveling how they can possibly believe this stuff. Sometimes pure indignation takes over. Though I admit that the reaction by some professional scientists to their 'discoveries' is 'not done', I must say that they authors have only themselves to blame if they are ignored like that!
15 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Based on ancient manuscripts; excellent.,
By Alan Jones (Lousville, Kentucky) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Holy Kingdom: The Quest for the Real King Arthur (Paperback)
A vital book.The smear of misread manuscripts is not new and one that various powerful interests have tried through the ages. Anhun, or Annhun Nigri, was indeed Arthur lst as the whole picture presented by an understanding of the interlocking Welsh genealogies shows. Blackett and Wilson have stuck to the ancient record and tried to understand how one Arthur figure could have battled and beaten the Romans at Soissy in 383 and also defeated the Saxons circa 560. Obviously there were two men! Annhun's story is the same at that of Arthur 1st, whose burial stone Blackett and Wilson discovered several years ago near Atherstone (Arthr's Twyn, or Arthur's burial site?) in the West Midland, within the Old Bury ancient site founded circa 250 AD as the record states. The legend on the stone read Artorius - in other words Arthur. The site is at the heart of an old Welsh kingdom where experts in place names like Margaret Gelling have clearly said "English and Welsh lived together". Hence we should not be surprised that during a period of Welsh dominance, mistakenly described as the "latter period of Roman domination" (there was no such thing), Welsh place names, burial sites and other artefacts should be discovered in the modern West Midlands within the ancient bishopric of Lichfield. So Annhun, who died circa 388 and who was a direct descendent of Arthur/Arthwys ll ap Meurig ap Tewdrig, was indeed a vitally important figure within the Khumric dynasty and whose authenticity is not in doubt. We now know that it was Arthur, specifically, due to the discovery of the stone and evidence presented very clearly, and unambiguously, in The Holy Kingdom. You do not need to rely simply upon one manuscript with Blackett and Wilson; all references are stated and given in copious detail in The Holy Kingdom and are available to see. All Welsh historians dating back to at least 1760 (I have the books here) and back into the 1500s, moreover, (haven't got them!) stated that Arthur was a Welsh king. Their work was based upon manuscript research; many of the authors were theological types based at Oxford University. Wilson and Blackett have allowed the past to speak and for an Arthurian "renaissance" to take place. They, it turns out, have led this new movement based on ancient and unimpeachable evidence. This is a massively important book and one that I can only highly recommend. As a Welshman, and welsh speaker, living in Louisville, Kentucky, I understand the issues, the reasons for attacks on the author's work and the powerful interests that would rather this all just went away. So please purchase the Holy Kingdom from amazon.com today!
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|