Home Diagnostics True Track Smart System Blood Glucose Monitor

by Home Diagnostics

Product Features

• Biosensor Technology
• Chip Coding
• Tiny blood sample - just 1 microliter
• Easy to use - 2 simple steps
• 10 Second test time

Product Description

Our most advanced system, TrueTrack delivers nothing less than outstanding performance. TrueTrack requires a tiny blood sample, provides fast results in just 10 seconds, and with two simple steps, is very easy to use. Not to mention, sophisticated data management capabilities. It's ease and convenience makes it the ideal meter for the moderate to frequent tester with an active, on-the-go lifestyle.

Product Details

• Item Weight: 9.6 ounces
• Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Shipping: Currently, item can be shipped only within the U.S.
• ASIN: B000LJE02Y
• UPC: 021292001018
• Item model number: A4H01-81
• Average Customer Review: 2.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (23 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #34,214 in Health & Personal Care (See Top 100 in Health & Personal Care)
  • #19 in Health & Personal Care > Medical Supplies & Equipment > Health Monitors > Blood Glucose
  • #27 in Health & Personal Care > Health Care > Diabetes > Monitors & Kits

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

38 of 44 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars Horrible, frighteningly inconsistent, September 16, 2008

By 

xardoz (St. Louis, MO) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Home Diagnostics True Track Smart System Blood Glucose Monitor (Health and Beauty)

I received the Walgreens branded version of this meter (it's exactly the same) as my first meter when I was diagnosed last week. Setup is needlessly complex, and the meter will give radically different readings - even on different fingers of the same hand within three minutes of each other.

Last week, I washed, rinsed and dried my hands thoroughly before handling the strips and lance, then rewashed, rinsed and dried my left ring finger and inserted the strip with my right hand (being overly careful not to touch anything with my left hand. I lanced my left ring finger and it read 499. Panicking, I repeated my prep, and tested my right ring finger for a reading of 150. okay, I thought, bad strip. It has to happen, right?

Over the next week, the readings fluctuated radically, so I tested myself using my wife's meter. Rock solid, repeatable results on multiple fingers over multiple times. Thinking maybe my strips were bad, I opened a new pack tonight and properly set up the meter with the new strips, according to the instructions. I properly cleaned and dried my hands and tested my left thumb with a reading of 299, then my right middle finger for a reading of 222. Now my left middle finger for a reading of 153, all in the space of three minutes, max.

I did a Google search on this thing, and several other people have had similar problems. Consumer Reports rated it LAST in their Sept. 08 ratings of 13 blood-glucose self-test kits. I'm throwing this thing away and getting the OneTouch UltraMini, which CR rated highest, for only $2 more than this horrible, cursed thing.

17 of 18 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Very Accurate and Inexpensive Meter, January 2, 2009

By 

TBR (Chicago, IL) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Home Diagnostics True Track Smart System Blood Glucose Monitor (Health and Beauty)

I chose this meter specifically because it was the cheapest in Walgreens, back when I was first diagnosed and before I knew that meters vary so much in quality. I started to get nervous about the TrueTrack later on after reading all the poor reviews.

I decided to bring the meter to my doctor's appointments to compare my results. On three separate occasions, the TrueTrack was within at least two points of the doctor's office. I even brought my TrueTrack with me when I had lab work done at a separate facility and my meter had me one point off from the lab's reading.

My readings always reflect how I feel. I have another discount meter (not a TrueTrack, but that's supposedly of higher quality) that reads me 14-41 points higher than the TrueTrack. I thought the TrueTrack was deceiving me, but I trust the doctor's office laboratory more than I do this other meter.

The test strips are relatively expensive. They almost always include coupons inside the box, which is helpful. I don't think the meter is all that complicated, but if you've never used one before, then you should watch the instructional videos online. I had to do that when it came time to calibrate the meter.

P.S. If you are getting weird results on your meter, then calibrate the meter to ensure accuracy. Remember that testing yourself several times in a row within a few minutes is going to mess up your results. Wait at least half an hour between testings on the same meter. If none of these tips works, call the manufacturer of ANY broken meter and demand a new one.

27 of 36 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars THIS IS NOT A BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR PEOPLE !!!!, November 13, 2009

By 

Charles P. Rubin - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Home Diagnostics True Track Smart System Blood Glucose Monitor (Health and Beauty)

To all the reviewers who cite inaccuracies when
taking multiple tests within a 3-5 minute or so window...

THIS IS NOT A BLOOD PRESSURE METER!!!


ACCURACY IS MESSED UP - NOT IMPROVED,

ON THE MOST ACCURATE, HOME USE(not made to be used in an office setting)
MONITORS BY TAKING MULTIPLE TESTS WITHIN A FEW MINUTES!!!!!

These meters have components that are biologically sensitive
and every time you test your blood the components are
affected for a period of time after it's processed the reading.

Most people haven't educated themselves on these meters well.

Also, many people think that because testing your blood pressure
three or so times in a row is more accurate

THEN, OF COURSE, testing your blood multiple times must be better then ONCE!

WRONG!!!

If your readings don't make sense check the calibration!

EVERY METER ON THE MARKET(Yes, even the no-codes) needs to be calibrated.

If you can't be bothered to do test the calibration of your meter,
at least wait several munutes to a half hour before testing again.

But realize that testing multiple times within minutes will CAUSE just
as much inaccuracy as if your meter is miscalibrated or damaged.


I've got a Freedom meter that uses $60/per 50 test strips and occassionally test the two at the same time against one another and they have never been more then 3 points apart in readings(and once, before I got the TrueTrack, got a weird reading on the Freedom meter - no product is perfect).

The Freedom meter doesn't require coding(big deal, coding, takes a few seconds for every box of 50 strips - how lazy are people who find that a big deal?) but the strips are a couple of bucks over $60/per 50.

I didn't mind the expense, though being overly Catholic I think it's wrong to outright just WASTE money,

but even though I could afford the strips, my doctor recommended the TrueTrack meter over it because he believes the "four lead" technology they use is more accurate.


I'm willing to deal with sticking a chip in the meter once every 50 strips for a few seconds(coding)

as well as 10 seconds vs. 5 seconds for more accurate results.

Plus, hello! The test strips are less then $20/per 50.


A few seconds coding per 50 strips and 5 extra seconds gets you MORE ACCURATE readings.

Those two ridiculously petty sacrificies are worth the added accuracy.

AND the supplies are ridiculously cheaper!!!


People, please read up on these issues before you trash things that you aren't using properly!

I've seen this syndrome with computer and other tech produsts when I sold computers so many times it's maddening.

People imagine how the equipment will work before they educate themselves on it's use.

Then when the real, actual, physical tech item doesn't act in a way that in their heads they think it should,

THEY ASSUME IT DOESN'T WORK RIGHT!

It NEVER EVEN OCCURS TO THEM that just because THEY IMAGINED the tech product(real object) works a certain way

DOESN'T MEAN THE PRODUCT ACTUALLY WORK THE WAY they IMAGINED.

IMAGINING something functions a certain way doesn't mean you really know how that hardware works.

If imagination made us knowledgable,
anybody with an imagination would be able to Engineer, build, repair and fix anything.

That's just not the way the real world works. :(


P.S. To help the gentleman who wrote the following in his review:

"Also, TrueTrack's meter reads low (LLL) at 20 and high (HHH) at 600. With those blood sugar results it would be really unsafe to drive, or you might not be able to call for help before you blacked out."

You are misunderstanding what you read.

The meter is not saying a blood sugar level gets low only when you go below 20 or is high only over 600.

A quick glance at the owner's manual explains this in the instructions on the page immediately after the instructions on how to take your test.

All they are saying is that the meter's range is 20-600.

The LO warning is to let you know the meter can't read the Blood Glucose level because the level is LOWER then it is able to read.

The HIGH warning is to let you know that the meter can't read the Blood Glucose level because the level is HIGHER then it is able to read.

The warning telling you whether or not the meter can't read it because it is either too LOW or whether because it is too HIGH

is an important FEATURE, not a flaw.

Why you may ask?

When I first developed diabetes my doctor sent me to the emergency room because my blood sugar level read 550 on his meter. (Actually at the time it was as much because I was presenting the symptoms of a gallbladder attack as much as the crazy sugar reading).

His meter gave no warning that my blood sugar level was really out of its 550 max range, so he assumed my blood sugar level was actually 550,
cab(no driving) to the emergency room high,

but nowhere near as high as it actually was.

When I got to the emergency room and got the laboratory blood test results
it wasn't 550, it was 1020!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




A HIGH out of range alarm on my doctor's handheld would have let us know that it was higher then the range the device could range.

LO just means your sugar is lower then the device can read,
HIGH just means your sugar is higher then the device can read.

They are not making any statement that anything in between is necessarilly okay in any way.

They are only warning you the results are either too low or if it is too high for the device to read.

It has nothing to do with telling you that between 20-600 you are okay.

I hope this makes you feel a little more at ease, good luck!


To help the guy who wrote:

"I have this testing machine. It worked well with the first ten strips it came with. Then I spent $$$ on additional strips & it never worked again."

Coding? A new box of strips will NEVER work unless you take a few seconds to use the unique coding chip that comes with every new box of strips.

Did you use the new coding chip that comes in every box? The strips on coding meters will never work unless you use the new coding chip that comes in every new box.

Maybe this wasn't the problem, you might have also gotten a box with a damaged coding chip. That happened to me once and I was able to exchange the strips for a new box.

Not coding or a bad chip seems to explain your problem pretty exactly.

But regardless, if you find coding to be too difficult, and/or you suddenly seem to have the problem again after running out of strips and you can't figure it out,

or if it's simply too a big a hassle and you don't want to be bothered with it,

try buying an accurate no-code meter like the Freedom meter, but be prepared to pay more for the strips guy. :(