Customer Reviews

From Homer to Harry Potter: A Handbook on Myth and Fantasy

5 star:		(4)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(3)

 

 

Perhaps I am just new to this type of analytical writing, but I found this book absolutely fascinating. True, the first part was deep, but it was worth wading through. I picked it up because I am tired of Harry-bashing and wanted to see what these guys thought. I kept reading it because I liked what I read. I found I had to keep a piece of paper in the book to keep a list of other things they recommended, and have been reading their recommendations ever since and loving it all. I am now reading Lawhead's "Taliesin" because of "From Homer..." and have been fascinated by his (Lawhead's) quote of the "Mabinogion." Actually knowing how the two books are related makes it all that more interesting. I highly recommend this book for anyone seriously interested in any genre from Faerie to Myth and how Christians should intelligently approach these types of books. HIghly recommended too for homeschoolers at the high school level for English Lit credit.

This is just the book I needed to cushion my sorrow of having finished Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, which to me was like saying goodbye to an old friend. This fine overview of the literature of myth and fantasy, from their origins to the present, is from an entirely Christian perspective, while simultaneously showing a love for these works in the spirit of Tolkien and Lewis. After introducing us to the foundations of all myth and fantasy, they use the principles of Tolkien and Lewis to explain the adherence to tradition, or the lack thereof, in modern works of fantasy, such as the His Dark Materials trilogy of Philip Pullman, and of course, Joanne Rowling's Harry Potter.

The best part of this book, for me personally, was the final chapter, entitled Harry Potter: Saint or Serpent? I considered myself well read on all of the Christian defenses of the Harry Potter theories, especially those of author John Granger, but also others all over the Internet. I was very pleasantly surprised. Although John Granger does very well in elucidating positively on all of the Christian symbolism and aspects of the Harry Potter series, these authors do more than I have ever seen in terms of their negative arguments concerning the harmfulness of the magic in Harry Potter. The nature of magic in the books is thoroughly dissected, along with comparisons from other works to assess its appropriateness for Christian readers. All along the way, even when analyzing Pullman's trilogy (a work that is terribly disrespectful to Christianity and all theistic religions), the authors wisely avoid any of the disrespectful zealousness of fundamentalism, while still remaining true to conservative Christianity, and not shying away from reasoned criticism where necessary. This is a marvelous feat, and all accomplished during a pleasurable read, especially if you're curious about what came before and paved the way for Joanne Rowling's wonderful addition to the edifying land of fairies.

Excellent book from Matthew Dickerson and David O'Hara covering a wide variety of myth and fantasy. If you're looking for a thoughtful, engaging and well-written discussion of stories, or if you just plain like them, this is for you.

The authors evaluate fantasy from a Christian perspective. While they have interesting things to say, it is a rather narrow focus. For instance they judge Le Guin's The Wizard of Earthsea series to be morally ambivalent, whereas many readers would recognize her as presenting a Taoist point of view. Judging the worth of a work of fantasy this way, to me, does not shed much light on the relevance of the genre to our modern society as a whole. It also misses or misconstrues many works that can not be read favorably from their world view. The authors are not necessarily close minded toward other religions. But their focus generally detracts from this book's broader appeal.

I came across this book somewhat by accident and am very glad that I did. It is an absolute treasure trove of information. And, as I said to a friend when recommending it, the authors quote all the right people, especially Tolkien and C.S. Lewis.
I was in synch with the authors from the beginning, having long ago been converted, along with Lewis, to the concept of "true myth" and to an understanding of the Christian story as the one True Story. Unlike some of the other reviewers, I deeply appreciated the authors' Christian viewpoint, one which is becoming increasingly rare these days. Since I considered their discussion of works I know (e.g., Ursala LeGuin's "Earthsea Trilogy" and Stephen Donaldson's Thomas Covenant series) to be accurate and insightful, I am also willing to trust their judgment regarding Pullman's "His Dark Materials."
Although I am very well read in the genres under discussion, I still found some material that was new to me, e.g., the "Heliand" and the writings of Patricia McKillip. But what I found most beneficial was the application of several key concepts to the understanding of myth, fantasy, and fairy tale. These are borrowed from Tolkien: the great cauldron of story, the three faces of myth and faerie, and the fact that these stories take place on or near the boundary between worlds. The application of these concepts to the writings discussed was extremely helpful, along with the examination of the worldviews of the writers.
My only disappointment was with the last chapter on Harry Potter. I do not agree with John Granger (whom several reviewers cited) the Rowling is writing Christian fiction. I think Dickerson and O'Hara got too caught up in the magic issue instead of applying the same criteria to the Harry Potter books that they used for the other writings they discussed. To be fair, they had only the first five books to go on, but even by that point I was convinced that Rowling is a secular humanist.
Nevertheless, this is an extremely valuable book and I would recommend it (and have done so) to anyone with an interest in the genres under consideration.

This book is awful. In the chapter on Homeric myth, the authors (one of whom claims to be a college Greek instructor) make statements that are weirdly inaccurate or simply dead wrong. For example, on page 98 they assert that the name "Odysseus" is connected with "hodos," the Greek word for road. The two words have no linguistic connection whatsoever. It's like saying the "qui" in "quiz" is "related" to the "qui" in "quiet."

On the next page they claim that on his way home, Odysseus "must wrestle with shape changing Proteus." It is Menelaus who wrestles with Proteus, not Odysseus, as anyone who has actually read the Odyssey can tell you.

On the very same page, they assert that when he arrives home, Odysseus "has lost all the treasure he accumulated on his journey." In making this statement they ignore the boatload of treasure (gold, bronze and "goodly raiment") the Phaeacians gave to Odysseus to bring with him to Ithaca, which he then stashes, with Athena's help, in the cave of the nymphs as soon as he arrives home.

These kinds of "epic" blunders undermine the authors' credibility to such a degree that it is hard to take seriously anything else they have to say in this amateurish production.

review written by the person I bought this book for.

I was excited to receive this book as a present, as I teach subjects on mythology and fairy tales, and enjoy the Harry Potter books. However, I was very disappointed when I got to the section on Homer, as it contains a large number of basic errors about the plots of the two epics, especially the Odyssey. These are mistakes that I would be annoyed to find in my students' essays, and would remark to them that it they seemed not to have actually read the epics, or at least not recently. I haven't finished the book yet, but my confidence in the statements made by these authors in other areas has been greatly shaken.

I've only read the last couple of chapters of this book, but my advice is, don't buy it for the Harry Potter part. There are a few pages on HP, and they say things everyone has said before by John Granger and others. John Granger's books are hard to follow at times, but he really engages with the HP books in a way this book doesn't.

I also read the His Dark Materials chapter which seemed biased against Pullman, but I need to read the rest of the book to rate it fairly.

I was very excited about this book as an intellectual investigation into myth and fantasy used through out world literature.

How dissapointed I was. This book is initially very interesting but the more you read the more clear it becomes that these are Christian fundies writing this book and the only purpose they see for art is one that converts more people to Christianity. Ironically the Book rails against the author Bill Pullman for having an anti Christian "axe to grind" when they clearly have their own "Christian Axe to grind". This book pretends to be critical discourse. All it really is is christian propoganda that states anything that isn't "christian" is bad.

This book is chock full of information about myth and fantasy; however, you have to wade through the Tolkeinese form of writing to decipher the meanings. It's not all it's cracked-up to be...beginning writers take note...it's not going to give you much insight or instruction on writing fantasy and myth. Actually, as I've long suspected, writing in these genres is mostly what's in your head. Sometimes other writers will inspire you in one direction or another, but I don't think this book will. It's full of description but not much else. Seems to be trying to pin-down the "real" meaning of myth and, as we all know, it's a slippery area with a myriad of meanings. (Like beauty's in the eye of the beholder.)