Most Helpful Customer Reviews
154 of 162 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
When does eccentricity become utter madness?, September 1, 2009
Homer and Langley Collyer were real people. These two brothers were found dead in their Harlem apartment in 1947. They were pack rats. Or, at least Langley was. When their brownstone revealed a hundred tons of newspapers and junk inside, stuff like an old car, the public was amazed and fascinated. Their story has been the stuff of legend ever since. Doctorow imagines their story as fiction - he furnishes the telling details about their family - the twists and turns that led them to their lonely fates. They live longer in his version by at least 20 some years. There is a wonderful section where hippies move in with them for a bit. They have love affairs. The blind one, Homer, tells the story and Doctorow allows us to share the visions observed with Homer's supposedly sightless eyes. Michiko Kakutani panned the book today in the NY Times. That's good. When Michiko hates on a book I often love it. And I loved this one. Doctorow's pithy trip down memory lane with these two loveable oddballs is strangely exhilarating. Homer is a sweetheart, so gentle. Langley is powerful and brilliant. They make for quite a pair.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
57 of 60 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Only Doctorow could make this story better...., September 3, 2009
I've long been fascinated by Homer and Langley story. I first heard their tale, twisted though it was, on a Ripley's Believe it or Not years ago. Over the years they would find mention in the odd article here and there. I was very happy to see that E. L. Doctorow devoted a book to them, though it is, after-all a fictional account. Still, Homer and Langley is worth reading. As in all cases when an author turns a true story into a novel, the reader has to be careful about how much they should actually believe. I was completely convinced by Doctorow's treatment of these two sympathetic misfits. He does a masterful job at taking their story and then creating a world that the story can proceed in. Two brothers inherit the plush 5th Avenue home of their parents and move in. It isn't long before their odd behavior begins to isolate them from their neighbors. During the ensuing years, Homer quietly goes blind relying on Langley to take care of him. Langley does take care of Homer, but also manages to stuff their plush home full of odd items collected over the years. Not only are odd items hidden in the Harlem brownstone, but Langley saves newspapers and magazines galore. For those of you not familiar with the story, you'll need to read Homer and Langley to see what happens. Doctorow does plays with time just a bit, moving the story a few years. However, within the confines of the tale, time is relative and in this case simply doesn't matter. Doctorow also chooses to let the story play out and end in pretty much the same way the real one did and I congratulate him for that. One final thought. For some reason, E. L. Doctorow is always a challenge for me to read. I suspect the difficulty is with me and probably related to his style. However, like and addict, I can't resist his novels. I must admit I had less difficulty with Homer and Langley than City of God, The Waterworks, or Billy Bathgate. Homer and Langley is one of the stranger stories you'll read. Just keep telling yourself, "its based on reality." I highly recommend. Peace always.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
56 of 61 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Very disappointing, September 27, 2009
I was 16 years old and living on the Upper West Side when the Collyer brothers were found dead in their formerly grand townhouse. The newspapers were filled for months with descriptions of all the outlandish items and tons of newspapers they hoarded in their decrepit mansion, so that the police had to enter the house through the roof because the hallways were so tightly blocked. So I was eager to read this new version of their story, and really wanted to love it. Immediately I was surprised at how short it - 208 pages for such a fertile subject. Doctorow is a much-respected, prizewinning author, so I expected a fully-fleshed-out story of the two well-educated men from a well-off family, who ended up as these poor souls did. Why did they live and die as they did? Sadly, the book seemed very pedestrian and lacking in imagination to me. I also wonder why he placed them about 20 years later in time than their actual lifespans. To include Japanese internment, the postwar years and even VietNam? To give the author an excuse for not imagining what happend to them in what he considered the less-interesting times in which they actually lived? In 1954, just 7 years after their discovery, the respected author Marcia Davenport's book, "My Brother's Keeper", came out. A fictionalized but fully realized and beautiful novel based on these men and their tragic ending, it gave one of many possible answers to the question everyone asked, "What could have caused it?" She wove a fully rounded story - using but not not citing facts, and giving them full lives and personalities that provided logical reasons for their insatiable collecting of seemingly random stuff: pianos,the car,costumes, newspapers, etc., and inevitably led them in a natural progression to their tragic ending, as she imagined it. An unforgettable book. I'm glad I read "Homer and Langley" because these brothers continue to fascinate me, but from E.L. Doctorow, who took two-and-a-half years to write this book, I expected much more than this. In the end, there can be no "true" story explaining these now-mythic brothers. It all has to be imagined.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|