Originally published in 1944.
--This text refers to the
Hardcover
edition.
Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Save up to 70% when you rent your textbooks on Amazon. Keep your textbook rentals for a semester and rental return shipping is free. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
Review
“A must-read for anybody with serious interest in games and play. It is the classic work in the field, still more informative than any of the modern books on the subject.” —Chris Crawford, author of Chris Crawford on Game Design
“A fascinating account of ‘man the player’ and the contribution of play to civilization.” —Harper’s
“A fascinating account of ‘man the player’ and the contribution of play to civilization.” —Harper’s
“A writer with a sharp and powerful intelligence, helped by a gift of expression and exposition which is very rare, Huizinga assembles and interprets one of the most fundamental elements of human culture: the instinct for play. Reading this volume, one suddenly discovers how profoundly the achievements in law, science, poverty, war, philosophy, and in the arts, are nourished by the instinct of play.” —Roger Caillois, editor of Diogenes
--This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.Language Notes
Text: English, German (translation)
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
95 of 95 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Huizinga's genius is to find the idea of play hiding like a spider in the most unlikely places. The medieval "judicial duel", where justice was done by fighting? Clearly a development of ancient forms of combat - and that combat itself was always highly stylised and ritualised, which show, according to Huizinga, that they themselves were "play" forms. He demonstrates with convincing scholarship that Greek tragic drama and religion were also born from play.
The important thing for the reader to understand is that Huizinga does not think that play is in any way trivial or less than serious. In fact, he argues that play is a wider, more all-embracing concept than seriousness. Because the idea of seriousness excludes play, whereas the idea of play can very well be taken seriously. In the latter portion of his book, he laments the fact that play has been ripped from its organic place at the heart of communities and transferred to commercialized spheres of sport.
Contrary to what another reviewer says here, Huizinga was not writing in the 1950s but in 1938. A time when the old ideals of nobility and chivalry even in war had been exploded. A time when the very idea of play was something worth cherishing, something to attempt to preserve for a more fortunate future.
This is a masterpiece of deeply humanist historical and cultural analysis. If it annoys poststructuralists, well, its the poststructuralists who have the problems.
Steven Poole, author, Trigger Happy: Videogames and the Entertainment Revolution
31 of 34 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
I'm sure the translation is as poor as everyone says, but for God's sake, this is one of only three or four absolutely essential twentieth-century books on the history of games and gaming. It's insightful and humorous even in English, so just imagine how good it is in Dutch. Along with Murray, Bell, Conway, et al, this is a necessary assignment for anyone who wants to talk about the subject. Five stars. Five! Five! Five!
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
I am surprised that this book has garnered mixed reviews. I consider it the most important book about play, and I write that as the author of a number of books on game design.
Why is this book so important? First, it clearly differentiates between play and games; there is a great deal of play-activity that does not constitute game-playing. That differentiation is lost on many people. Second, it explores the concept of play from an astounding number of directions. The strongest analysis is the linguistic analysis, which considers how many different languages address the concept of play. The word "play" is one of the semantically broadest words in the English language. From terms such as 'gun play' to 'play' as a theatrical production to 'play' as the freedom of movement of a mechanical part to 'player' as a device that plays a recording, the notion of play has spread broadly and deeply into many different cultures, and the special emphases that different cultures place on the meaning of play itself reveals much about the concept. What we call a 'bastard' in English is a 'spielkind' in German: a "play-child". The Japanese language has an entire formal sublanguage for addressing certain sensitive topics. "I am sad to learn that your father is playing at being dead" would be a literal translation of this kind of language. What does that say about the concept of play in the human mind?
Huizinga offers many other brilliant insights into the nature of play in the human species. His observations on the idea of demarcating territory in which certain rules of play apply -- a royal court, a court of law, or a basketball court -- are eye-opening. We humans have a subjunctive sense that we explore with variations on play.
Also impressive is the range of angles he uses to zero in on the concept of play. He considers play in art, poetry, law, war, language, and play as a civilizing process. Play has become a substitute for direct violent conflict. We civilized humans deflect our bloodlust into athletic games. Imagine the emotional intensity of spectators applied to political conflict; we're tear ourselves to pieces!
Play is also immensely valuable as an educational process. The fact that all carnivorous mammals engage in play communicates the value of play in the upbringing of the young.
It's true that some of the material delves into topics now considered somewhat musty. I confess that sometimes I was happy to have put a chapter behind me. But the book is short and the tedious sections are quickly passed by.
I consider this book a must-read for anybody with serious interest in games and play. It is the classic work in the field, still more informative than any of the modern books on the subject -- including my own!
Why is this book so important? First, it clearly differentiates between play and games; there is a great deal of play-activity that does not constitute game-playing. That differentiation is lost on many people. Second, it explores the concept of play from an astounding number of directions. The strongest analysis is the linguistic analysis, which considers how many different languages address the concept of play. The word "play" is one of the semantically broadest words in the English language. From terms such as 'gun play' to 'play' as a theatrical production to 'play' as the freedom of movement of a mechanical part to 'player' as a device that plays a recording, the notion of play has spread broadly and deeply into many different cultures, and the special emphases that different cultures place on the meaning of play itself reveals much about the concept. What we call a 'bastard' in English is a 'spielkind' in German: a "play-child". The Japanese language has an entire formal sublanguage for addressing certain sensitive topics. "I am sad to learn that your father is playing at being dead" would be a literal translation of this kind of language. What does that say about the concept of play in the human mind?
Huizinga offers many other brilliant insights into the nature of play in the human species. His observations on the idea of demarcating territory in which certain rules of play apply -- a royal court, a court of law, or a basketball court -- are eye-opening. We humans have a subjunctive sense that we explore with variations on play.
Also impressive is the range of angles he uses to zero in on the concept of play. He considers play in art, poetry, law, war, language, and play as a civilizing process. Play has become a substitute for direct violent conflict. We civilized humans deflect our bloodlust into athletic games. Imagine the emotional intensity of spectators applied to political conflict; we're tear ourselves to pieces!
Play is also immensely valuable as an educational process. The fact that all carnivorous mammals engage in play communicates the value of play in the upbringing of the young.
It's true that some of the material delves into topics now considered somewhat musty. I confess that sometimes I was happy to have put a chapter behind me. But the book is short and the tedious sections are quickly passed by.
I consider this book a must-read for anybody with serious interest in games and play. It is the classic work in the field, still more informative than any of the modern books on the subject -- including my own!
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
Play isn't just for fun
I don't know how anyone can read this book and think it is a terrible translation. This book was poetic and playful itself as it delved into the subject. Read more
Published 16 months ago by Laurence Chalem
3.0 out of 5 stars
An Interesting, Although Marred Reflection on the Play Impulse
Huizinga's text on the nature of the play impulse in man and as a formative principle for culture is indeed interesting but suffers from the myopic view that can occur when one... Read more
Published on January 21, 2007 by Matthew K. Minerd
5.0 out of 5 stars
"No one is more serious than children at their games" Montaigne
The search for the essence of our humanity has led thinkers to time and again single out one aspect of our complex nature. Read more
Published on April 23, 2006 by Shalom Freedman
1.0 out of 5 stars
Horrible translation!
Please be aware that this book really is a horrible translation of Huizinga's original and insightful attempts to make sense of 'play'. Read more
Published on December 26, 2002 by Cees Jan Mol
3.0 out of 5 stars
Original but not essential.
Huizinga illustrates with numerous examples out of all sort of civilizations that culture first appears under the form of play. The first forms of culture are played. Read more
Published on October 27, 2002 by Luc REYNAERT
3.0 out of 5 stars
flawed, but brilliant in its way
Huzinga sees the "play-instinct" as an instinct that emerged very early in human prehistory - in fact, he sees it as one of humanity's primary instincts, one which... Read more
Published on June 1, 2000 by Jeremy P. Bushnell
