Going in to the the novel, I did not know what to expect. There was no foundation of prior reading experience for it to fall upon, just a clean slate that it could just as easily slip away from. Or, it could remain firm as a beginning foundation for later works. I had high hopes that it would be the latter, that I would enjoy the novel. All of this almost came crashing down in the first twenty pages, when I found the prose grating and difficult to read for any sustained amount of time. I was tempted to put the book down then, but for whatever reason, perhaps a bit of tolerance that I lacked in the past year, kept me reading.
Eventually everything snapped into place. The once jarring prose that threatened to eject me from the book every few sentences suddenly blossomed into a flowing prose that lured me in and propelled me through the book. The imagery of it drew beautiful dream vistas, impossible landscapes tucked away inside a small beach house free floating somewhere in the ocean, and the chaotic blend of modern and ageless in stories told to calm a psychic energy baby festooned with amputated phantom limbs. The story is slow to unfold, taking its time to reveal to the characters that this house filled with their discarded dreams is not as benign as they assume, but the pace is comfortable and works well. On a negative level, the dialogue came across as stilted at times and this clashed with the flow of the narrative enough that it threw me from the story on more than one occasion.
Vimbai and her roommates, Maya and Felix, are the central characters in the novel, but they are part of an extended cast that is as diverse as it is strange. I am struggling to come up with a cast from another book that can compete with one that includes a psychic energy baby, a Atlantic City bartender with a pack of hybrid fox-possums that follows her around, a guy with a pocket universe instead of hair that makes a living amputating phantom limbs, a ghostly grandmother transplanted from Zimbabwe that does the dishes and tells African folk stories, a talking fish that eats souls, and a college student with an army of Horseshoe Crabs. The extended cast does not feature much characterization, but that is contrasted by the characterization for the central characters.
Vimbai is especially well drawn. We spend a lot of time in her head and her memories, and her dreams seem to have the largest influence on the house and the landscapes that form inside it. She learns about herself as the novel progresses and it gets to the point that she begins to identify issues that has plagued her, issues she has chosen to ignore, and begins to rectify it. And here then is a line that I think may be drawn by readers, because I expect there will be those who think the characterization is done well and those who do not. Vimbai has grown by the time the novel comes to a close. She is no longer the girl we meet at the beginning of the book who suffers from a profound lack of confidence, but on the other hand, it is clear that her story is not over and that there is much more growing that needs to be done, growing that we are not privy to. I am fine with this, I rather like this because it is a touch of realism implanted in such a surreal novel. However, if I were a cartoon character, I would have a little vein popping out of my head with annoyance because the book ends without the resolution of an important plot point that I picked up on early and followed through to the reveal. I want that resolution, but I also understand that the character still lacks the confidence needed to take the steps towards it. Characterization and plot go hand in hand here and I think Sedia did wonders by not going the easy route and forcing an awkward moment by ushering in the resolution. I am still annoyed by it, of course, but I would rather be annoyed than disappointed. Whether or not there will be people out there who are the opposite of me and hate the characterization for hindering the plot is yet to be seen, but I will not discount the notion.
The characterization becomes thinner as we move along. The second of this central cast of characters is Maya, a bartender in an Atlantic City casino. For most of the book she remains a bit of a mystery, never revealing much of anything to the other characters and disappearing for stretches of time as she explores with her "dogs". This is a character we have seen before, the same seemingly hard-ass, aloof woman that populates every sort of media, but as the book progresses and she pairs up with Vimbai more often, both the characters and the reader learn more about her. Maya began life as a mild disappointment for me, but I began to understand the character more and even feel sorry for her as I got to know her. I liked her by the end of the book and felt that it was a strong turnaround in characterization from where she began.
Felix, the third of the central cast and the roommate with a pocket universe undulating atop his skull in place of hair, is the least characterized. A lot of this has to do with how little page space the character got, which was considerably less than Maya and Vimbai and seemingly less than some of the supporting cast. The oddest of the lot, we see very little of him and know even less. Most of the information we get regarding him comes from minor characters and various conclusions from his roommates. Felix plays an integral part in the plot, but it is that very thing that makes him feel like less of a living, breathing character and more of a plot device. I am more than willing to admit that I may have missed something integral along the way, but after finishing the book, the character still remains more of a mystery to me than anything.
A big issue I had with this book has nothing to do with characterization or prose or pacing, but rather a technical aspect. The book was riddled with typos and while I am inclined to forgive and forget if the number is limited to a scattered few, there comes a point when my capacity to ignore them is stretched beyond its limits. I have seen books in worse condition from publishers both large and small and it is the same issue every time. Most of these typos could have been caught if only someone had given the novel one last read-through before sending it off for publication. And I know that this comes across as more of a nitpick than anything-I am not sure how many people would take note of the typos, let alone find it as much of an issue has I have-but when it gets to the point that I wish I would have taken count and marked pages so that I could come up with a final tally, then it comes away as a bit of a problem. This feels as though it could have been prevented and that it was not just strikes me as sloppy editing.
While I am on a nitpicking level, I am bothered by the subdued reaction of the cast to all the strange things going on around them. This is a complaint I had with Michal Ajvaz's The Other City, in which the narrator takes to the oddness without much in the way of distress. This is a work of fantasy of course, both works are, but I struggle with the notion that a cast of characters, some less weird than others, can encounter a house where cities exist somewhere beyond the pantry, meat grows on windows, and plants take over the walls and hallways, and take it in relative stride. Though, credit where it is due, Vimbai does freak out a little before she shrugs the whole thing off as if it was nothing special. If I woke up in my apartment with a desert found through my closet, my grandmother's ghost doing the dishes, and a pack of wild whatsits sitting by my slippers and offering me the morning paper, I am going to question my sanity and probably go loopy for a while. When reality flies through the window and characters take it with an appreciative nod and a murmured 'cool' (this is not taken from the book), I find it hard to read something like this and not have it nagging at the back of my head.
If you are looking for a novel with a unique and interesting story, then look no further than The House of Discarded Dreams. It is a good book, the best book I have read all year by sole virtue of being the only book I have read this year, and though it has issues, they do little to detract from the overall quality. I went out and bought another of Sedia's books, The Secret History of Moscow, on the strength of only the first half of this book, which is a good hint as to my opinion of her work.