![]() |
|
Amazon.com Textbooks Store
Shop the Amazon.com Textbooks Store and save up to 70% on textbook rentals, 90% on used textbooks and 60% on eTextbooks. |
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
The central thesis of the book is that Innovation can be achieved through some best practices but first companies need to overcome the romantic preconception that innovation is the sole province of lone geniuses. Hargadon is a social scientist that has been researching innovation for the past decade. He explores the concept of technology brokering and creating Innovation factories a subject he first wrote about in a Harvard Business Review article - Building an Innovation Factory.
Hargadon's research explores in detail Edison's Menlo Park as an example of one of the first documented innovation brokerages. He also looks at modern day examples such as IDEO (a company he has worked at) and Design Continuum.
One of the most interesting topics that is discussed is the debunking of the `Lone Genius Myth' and how the media could be responsible for putting American companies years behind the Innovation race by propagating and even probably being the original instigators of this myth. America's love affair with heroes is behind this myth; everyone wants to believe the stories of the lone genius in the garage inventing the next great technology that will change the world. This is not to say that lone geniuses don't come up with great inventions, but more to the point, they aren't the only source of innovation. Hargadon even goes as far as to explore the theory that Edison propagated this myth as a marketing exercise, he tapped into the America's need for heroes and played up his role as the lone inventor in the lab. In actuality his lab was a perfect example of innovation factory. He had a lot of very smart engineers that worked at the lab and most of his long list of inventions was really a product of their combined genius.
Menlo Park, New Jersey represented the first dedicated R&D facility and showed the industrial world the power of organized innovation. Menlo Park exemplifies Hargadon's model for innovation; by linking people, objects and ideas together from diverse worlds of knowledge you can create an environment where innovation through recombination happens. An modern day example of `Recombinant Innovation' is taken from Design Continuum; they combined the concept of an `inflatable splint' and a basketball shoe to create the concept of a basketball shoe that is used to prevent injuries by providing inflatable ankle support. They created these `air bladders' from medical IV bags.
Menlo Park created an environment where recombinant innovation could happen by modeling the lab on machine shops from which Edison emerged. These machine shops were where mechanics and independent entrepreneurs/inventors worked side by side, sharing tools/machines, stories and inevitably ideas. Edison built his organization to redistribute the ideas emerging from the telegraph industry and applying it to any new industry that electricity was being applied to. By bringing these diverse industries together, by creating an environment where people with diverse background worked on diverse projects, side by side he had created one of the first Innovation Factories. People, Industries and ideas were brought together in an environment conducive to sharing.
Hargadon goes on to explain some of the underpinnings of his theory drawing from network theory and the theory of "small worlds". He then gets into the "how" by showing different brokering strategies:
- A company committed to a full time strategy i.e. IDEO, Menlo Park
- Remain focused on the core business but dedicate groups that bridge different worlds (departments) and help broker ideas - Xerox Parc, 3M's Optical Technology Center
- Develop a strategy to seize on one-time opportunities for brokering i.e. Microsoft and building the Xbox.
Hargadon completes the book by listing 8 rules that are the basis of an organized pursuit of innovation through technology brokering.
If you truly want to create an innovation factory, you should read this book and then apply what it teaches you.
In this context, I am reminded of what Carla O'Dell asserts in If We Only Knew What We Know when discussing what she calls "beds of knowledge" which are "hidden resources of intelligence that exist in almost every organization, relatively untapped and unmined." She suggests all manner of effective strategies to "tap into "this hidden asset, capturing it, organizing it, transferring it, and using it to create customer value, operational excellence, and product innovation -- all the while increasing profits and effectiveness." Almost all organizations claim that their "most valuable assets walk out the door at the end of each business day." That is correct. Almost all intellectual "capital" is stored between two ears and much (too much) of it is, for whatever reasons, inaccessible to others except in "small change....there is no conclusion to managing knowledge and transferring best practices. It is a race without a finishing line."
I think this is precisely what Hargadon has in mind when insisting that the future is already here, that the "raw materials for the next breakthrough technology may [also] be already here [but probably] without assembly instructions," that decision-makers must find their "discomfort zones" rather than remain hostage to what Jim O'Toole calls "the ideology of comfort and the tyranny of custom," and that they should build a "bridge" to their own strengths but also to their weaknesses because, as they perform, so will their organization. I agree with Hargadon that innovation must unfold at the ground level, "in the minds and hearts of the engineers and entrepreneurs who are doing the work." Also, that -- meanwhile -- they and their associates must be guided and informed, not only by their own organization's "beds of knowledge" but also by external sources of information concerning prior successes and failures of the innovation process elsewhere. In the final analysis, there is good news and bad news. First the bad news: "New ideas are built from the pieces of old ones, and nobody works alone." Now the good news: "New ideas are built from the pieces of old ones, and nobody works alone."
|