Have one to sell? Sell yours here
How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors and Reviewers (Acp Information Technology Series)
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors and Reviewers (Acp Information Technology Series) [Paperback]

Thomas A. Lang (Author), Michelle Secic (Author)
4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Textbook Student FREE Two-Day Shipping for Students. Learn more

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback $45.44  
Paperback, January 15, 1997 --  
There is a newer edition of this item:
How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers 4.5 out of 5 stars (11)
$45.44
In Stock.

Book Description

0943126444 978-0943126449 January 15, 1997
By concentrating on how statistics are used and how they should be presented, this very readable text provides infor- mation needed to verify the accuracy and completeness of most statistical reports.


Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

Published by the American College of Physicians. --This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 367 pages
  • Publisher: American College of Physicians (January 15, 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0943126444
  • ISBN-13: 978-0943126449
  • Product Dimensions: 9.9 x 7 x 1.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #212,460 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

11 Reviews
5 star:
 (7)
4 star:
 (3)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.5 out of 5 stars (11 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

33 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A Review By A Chinese Medical Writer, April 28, 2000
This review is from: How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors and Reviewers (Acp Information Technology Series) (Paperback)
Book Review of " How to Report Statistics in Medicine"

The book " How to Report Statistics in Medicine" is written by Tom Lang and Michelle Secic in 1997, published by the American College of Physicians (ACP). Just as Edward J. Huth wrote in his foreword, " ........... physician who knows nothing about statistical methods expect to find in reports of clinical trials of drugs statistical evidence ................." "Unfortunately, what passed before our eyes as statistical analysis and reporting does not always represent the proper use of statistical methods or the clear and adequate reporting of statistical findings..., and the review system is not always infallible in judging statistical evidence and how it is presented." "Up until now, authors have had available little published guidance in how to report most effectively their statistical data." Under all this circumstances, the book came into being, aiming to bring valuable specific and detailed help to authors who wish to make their papers as statistically convincing as possible. In fact, this book is also written for medical writers and editors, authors reporting basic or clinical research, clinicians, residents, and students in all areas of medicine and health science, including nursing and allied health professionals. The first author of the book, Tom Lang, is Manager of Medical Editing Services at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, where he supervises the editing of scientific manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed journals. The second author of the book, Michelle Secic, is the Senior Biostatistician in the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, where she assists researchers in designing, analyzing, and interpreting medical research studies.

Here are some of the strengths and weakness of the book:

1. There are basically 4 major parts in the book: annotated guidelines to for reporting statistical information, guide to statistical terms and tests, an uninitiated, reference list of the guidelines, and 4 useful appendices. The guidelines are presented in very clear and easy-to -find way, marked by different signs and type fonts in alphabetical order. To me, part two is especially useful. Every time I do not know the exact meaning of a specific term in statistics, I can go directly to this part and look at the explanation and get a better idea. For example, the term "intention-to-treat analysis" is right there on page 262.

2. In part 4 of the book, the appendix on " Rules for Presenting Numbers in Text" provides useful information, since numbers are most commonly used in reporting results.

3. Part 1 is the key part of the book, which contains many specific topics on reporting statistics. For example, after looking through Section 6 of Part 1, "Testing for Relationships: Reporting Associations and Correlation Analysis", I know the function of correlation matrix and how to interpret different correlation values, and then check whether the author has come to a positive conclusion or not. The same is true of the knowledge about 95% CI, with which I may help medical researchers come to a more convincing conclusion.

4. This book is very carefully proofread and so far I have not found any typing error.

5. One weakness of the book is, I think, that it would probably be better for the book to come up with some exercises or a separate workbook, providing any one who wants to learn from this book some chances of practice. Here what I mean by exercise is not how to calculate a specific statistical value, and I am referring to the exercises that help readers to think of the correct report of statistics and to what extent they

6. Another minor limitation of the book is that it is too heavy to take as a portable reference book. If it was printed on thinner paper, I would like it even better.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


20 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent non-mathematical guide to reporting data!, January 19, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors and Reviewers (Acp Information Technology Series) (Paperback)
Since I am not a statistician, but a writer, I have been searching for a basic biostatistical textbook from which I could absorb just enough information to help me understand the statistical design of clinical trials, and to help focus and sharpen my reporting of statistical data. I now have a collection of biostatistical texts-I can open a used bookshop-none of which serve my needs. Although they all begin with a light approach-I should have browsed deeper through them in the bookstore-they soon get lost in deep statistical and mathematical minutia. Now, Lang and Secic, in "How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers," have achieved what others have not been able to-explain how to report statistical data AND the meaning of statistical tests, etc. They accomplish this without bombastic lectures and without the mathematical nuisances that get in the way of a non-statistician or someone who simply does not care about the derivation of statistical formulae. This will be my medical writing bible for years to come. My only complaint is that it should have been sold in hardcover-it will soon wear-out from all the use!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


19 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Understanding biostatistics without becoming a statistican, July 19, 2000
This review is from: How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors and Reviewers (Acp Information Technology Series) (Paperback)
As a medical writer and editor at The Cleveland Clinic, Thomas A. Lang found that the lack of clear understanding of statistics by non-statisticians affected the clarity of their writing. Physicians had the same problem while writing up their research papers for publication. Lang perceived a need among medical and science writers to understand just enough of biostatistics to make them better writers and editors without becoming statisticians themselves. He devised workshops that were conducted by the American Medical Writers Association which were enormously successful. The logical next step was to write this book based on the valuable teaching experience and feedback he got at those courses. In other words, this is a book that wasn't written in a vacuum but is the result of a perceived need, and the author's experience in meeting that need. Co-author Michelle Secic has also contributed with her expertise, making it a valuable book for people in this field.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews









Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
First Sentence:
The importance of stating the purpose of a research project is obvious, but such a statement is sometimes missing from research reports. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
single continuous response variable, reporting research designs, simple logistic regression analysis, more survival curves, statistical review process, multiple testing problem, categorical explanatory variables, statistical guidelines, principles versus practices, more extreme than the one, outliers cannot, methodologic standards, hysteroscopy evaluations, allocation concealment, reporting clinical trials, primary comparisons, simple linear regression analysis, multiple pairwise comparisons, single response variable, one response variable, outlying data, article about therapy, interim analyses, primary analyses, classical hypothesis testing
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Potential Problem Related, Sub-Guideline Method of Checking, Ann Intern Med, Council of Biology Editors, Can Med Assoc, International Committee, American Medical Association, Control Clin Trials, British Journal of Surgery, Stat Med, Arch Intern Med, Editorial Policy Committee, Clin Oncol, Clin Pharmacol, Continued Sub-Guideline, Obstet Gynaecol, Public Health, Lab Clin Med, National Institutes of Health, The Zitter Group, American Journal of Clinical Oncology, Bone Joint Surg, Cleve Clin, Clin Epidemiol, Massachusetts Medical Society
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:





Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject