45 of 46 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Awesome reference, October 2, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Human Anatomy for Artists: The Elements of Form (Hardcover)
This is an extremely exhaustive book and well worth the price. As far as I know, there exists no more comprehensive book on how every muscle interconnects in the human body -- it is truly an encylopedia of the human anatomy.
A few things keep me from giving it a 5 star review.
1: Goldfinger's illustrations are fair, but not masterful, particularly those of the human face.
2: Strangely, there are almost no fully rendered full-body illustrations or even any fully rendered "body part" illustrations -- almost all the good sketches are of isolated body parts alone. For example, there isn't any fully rendered muscular illustration that encompasses both the upper arm AND the lower arm(!) There ARE full body illustrations, but only in a more schematical form.
3: There are no "application" illustrations of the anatomy in case studies such as bending, posing, flexing, etc. Most of the examples are in prone positions.
Granted, much of this information can be taken from any number of other anatomy books, particularly Richer's "Artistic Anatomy," which this book is largely based on and I also highly recommend.
Nevertheless, as a reference guide to the human body, this book has no peer. If you truly want to understand how the muscles of the body interconnect, there is no better alternative. This book is obviously a labour of love.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
36 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
the best anatomy reference available, October 27, 2002
This review is from: Human Anatomy for Artists: The Elements of Form (Hardcover)
this text served me extremely well as i learned figure drawing and is the best anatomical reference i have ever seen, a genuine encyclopedia of anatomy. however, artists should be warned that the approach is analytical (anatomy is broken down into its elements) rather than illustrative (anatomy is presented as pictures of different poses). goldfinger (a sculptor) attempts to explain surface form structurally, from the inside out -- starting with individual bones, then joints, then all visible muscles, facial features (eye, mouth, nose, ear), fat pads, surface veins and arteries, skin folds and finally a gallery of "mass conceptions" of the head, hand and full figure as blocks, continuous planes, cylinders, ovoids and photographed models. (some internal musculature is omitted because it does not affect surface form, but there is extensive information and photo documentation on the facial expression of emotions, largely based on the classic research by ekman and friesen.) this "inside out" approach also determines the content of the 1 to 3 page descriptions of each bone and muscle. in the section on muscles, four diagrams show the skeletal muscle attachments, isolated muscle form, form within surrounding muscles, and surface appearance in lean models, usually from two different points of view. schematic diagrams analyze muscle form into its basic shapes, or show the mechanical effects of muscle contraction. the text is often heavy going but presents unusually detailed and clear explanations of muscle attachments, action, form and interaction with other muscles or joints. there is also much information not available anywhere else, and all sex differences in anatomy (for example in the abdominal musculature and hip bones) are described in the text. goldfinger's goal is to provide the artist with the information necessary to identify the bones and muscles contributing to surface form in any model, any physique or any pose, and i have never found it to fail that purpose. for a breezier and visually more attractive approach, simblet's book is preferable.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
85 of 99 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Too many parts, not enough bodies, November 7, 2000
This review is from: Human Anatomy for Artists: The Elements of Form (Hardcover)
Detailed -- and disappointing. There are too many written
descriptions, too many line drawings, too much wasted space (large
margins, half-blank pages) and not enough photographs. The first
photograph appears on page 65. Prior to that, over half the pages are
primarily, or entirely, text. A randomly selected passage (p. 37):
"The tibial platform is divided into medial and lateral condyles.
Their top surfaces have elongated shallow facets. These facets
articulate with the medial and lateral condyles of the femur..."
Much of the text throughout the entire book is of this type.
Other
minuses include the paucity of body positions, and the dearth of
ethnicities and body types. Although the body PARTS are seen from the
front, back, and side, there are no bodies DOING anything. There are
no old people, no children, no fat people, no thin people, and except
for one light-skinned black man, no people of races other than
Caucasian. There is very little depiction of male and female
differences, although there is some descriptive text of them.
While
the book description says it includes genitalia, there is extremely
little of it -- hardly enough to mention. There is one photo of a
circumcised penis from the front, and one from the side; and the same
of an uncircumcised one. There are two frontal views of the
"female pubic region", one shaved and one unshaved, both
with legs tightly together. All of these photos are on one page, and
that is the extent of the "genitalia", unless you want to
include the page with female breasts. This page has four photos:
female breasts from the the front, in 3/4 profile, and from overhead,
and one male nipple. Oh yes -- genitalia is also included in the two
pages (only two!) of full body photographs. These two pages contain
eight photos, four male and four female. Each sex is seen from the
front, back, 3/4 front profile and 3/4 back profile. (These same
views are given of a male head, but there are no corresponding photos
of a female head.)
The book goes through the body part by part, the
usual format being one page of illustrations facing a page with
corresponding descriptive text. The illustrations usually include a
drawing of the underlying skeletal structure of the body part under
investigation, and next to it two more drawings, one of which adds
just one muscle, while the other adds the entire muscle group; finally
there is a photograph of the part. The photographs are rather small,
often less than an inch and a half wide. (Many of the margins are two
and a half inches wide.)
One plus is the 39 pages devoted to facial
expressions, although, again, more than half of these pages are
text-only (again with large margins and lots of blank space), and even
the pages of illustration contain only one or two expressions per
page, usually a front and a side view of the same expression, in the
usual format of skeleton + muscle drawings + photograph.
This is not
really a bad book, just not worth the money. I wouldn't have bought
it if I had examined it first. A better choice for the working artist
(especially if s/he is anywhere near the "starving"
category) would be Stephan Rogers Peck's "Atlas of Human Anatomy
for the Artist". Peck's book ... has much of the same
information as the ... Goldfinger book, and includes many useful
features not found in the more expensive book. Check out the reader
reviews on it!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No