Buy Used
Used - Very Good See details
$3.98 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Human Cloning Debate 2nd Edition
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Human Cloning Debate 2nd Edition [Paperback]

Glenn McGee (Editor)
4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Textbook Student FREE Two-Day Shipping for Students. Learn more

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  
Paperback, May 2000 --  
There is a newer edition of this item:
The Human Cloning Debate The Human Cloning Debate 4.7 out of 5 stars (6)
Out of Print--Limited Availability

Book Description

1893163121 978-1893163126 May 2000 2nd
In 1997 Scottish biologist Ian Wilmut successfully cloned a sheep, Dolly, in a controversial act many perceived as the first step toward human cloning. The Human Cloning Debate is the first book to present Wilmut's own thoughts on the troubling ramifications of this technology, along with essays by experts who explore the history and techniques of cloning, ethical issues, and the future possibilities. The previous edition was chosen as one of The New York Times's Top 100 Books for 1998.

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed


Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Dr. McGee, editor of The Human Cloning Debate, is Associate Director for Education of the Penn Center for Bioethics, and Assistant Professor in Penn's School of Medicine. He is a 1998 Atlantic Fellow of the Commonwealth Foundation. Dr. McGee has authored The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics (Rowman & Littlefield, 1997), in addition to over fifty articles, 11 reviews, and 7 encyclopedia entries. His comments have appeared in US and international newspapers, and he has discussed cloning, genetics, and bioethics on national news programs such as CNN, Charlie Rose, and PBS' Jim Lehrer News Hour. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 312 pages
  • Publisher: Berkeley Hills Books; 2nd edition (May 2000)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1893163121
  • ISBN-13: 978-1893163126
  • Product Dimensions: 9 x 5.6 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.8 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #4,083,411 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Glenn Edwards McGee is one of the best known bioethicists in the world. He is the John B. Francis Endowed Chair in Bioethics at the Center for Practical Bioethics, and the Editor in Chief of The American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB), the highest impact bioethics, health services, health economics or health law journal in the English language [ISI Impact Factor of 4.37], and heads the new AJOB family of Journals, including AJOB Primary Research and AJOB Neuroscience. He has served as a faculty member at the University of Pennsylvania (1995-2005), UMass, and other institutions and held tenured professorships in medicine and medical ethics and two endowed chairs. Glenn received his Ph.D. at Vanderbilt University and his B.A. at Baylor, where he was named Outstanding Young Alumnus in 2000, and one of the "top 150 graduates of all time" in 2008. Glenn was named one of the "10 most influential people in the New York Capital" in 2008, and was named to the top 40 under 40 in both Albany (2007) and Philadelphia (2004). Seed magazine described him in 2004 as "America's most imaginative young academic." Science noted in 2007 that Dr. McGee's work was one of the prime reasons for the entry of Upstate New York onto the radar screen of prestigious biomedicine.

Dr. McGee has been quoted about his research, which focuses on the family, genetics and reproduction, in most world newspapers. He has been a guest on most U.S. national television and radio news programs, such as Today, Fresh Air, Oprah, Nightline, and ABC World News Tonight, and has co-authored with a number of clinical and scientific luminaries such as Dr. Ruth, Stanley Greenspan, and Ian Wilmut, cloner of Dolly. He is a commentator for MSNBC News, for whom he authored a column from 2000-2003, and he has authored a monthly column from 2005-2007 for The Scientist, the most widely read magazine for scientists, as well as a syndicated column from 2005-2007 in a Hearst newspaper.

Dr. McGee's recent work has focused on ethical issues in autism, but he has authored more than 150 articles on a number of issues in bioethics for medical, legal, business and scientific journals, such as Science, Nature Medicine, and JAMA. His books include Who Owns Life?, Pragmatic Bioethics, The Human Cloning Debate, The Perfect Baby, and most recently Beyond Genetics, a New York Times bestseller about biotechnology and society. His work has ranged widely across many issues and has been widely cited. It has included a number of articles whose influence on the field of bioethics is acclaimed uniformly, including work in the areas of compensation of research subjects, models for parenting and enhancement, a pragmatic theory of bioethics, the patenting and sale of biological materials, ethical issues in tissue and gene banks, and ethical issues in stem cell research. He has received more than $6 million in grant funding from the Greenwall Foundation, the US Department of Education, National Institutes of Health, Haas Foundation and others.

Dr. McGee is very active in public policy. He has co-authored the text that became bills or stem cell legislation in four states, cloning legislation in seven, and has spoken for kings and presidents in eight nations on stem cell research including Dubai. Dr. McGee has delivered more than 80 named or endowed lectureships around the world, and hundreds of major lectures. He has testified before the House and Senate and multiple committees of a number of states in the U.S.. He has taught bioethics to incoming members of the U.S. Congress and teaches workshops on bioethics for the Association of Chief Justices of the US Courts of Appeals. He has served on the FDA Panel on Molecular and Genetic Devices, charged with evaluating all genetic tests and devices. He was the American external evaluator of all genetics and policy programs for the United Kingdom's Economic and Social Research Council in 2007. In 2006 Dr. McGee organized "Bioethics and Politics," the first national conference to bring together conservative and liberal thinkers in biomedical ethics, hailed as "the most important bioethics conference in 25 years" by the then ASBH President. He has been elected to the boards of directors of several foundations and organizations including Planned Parenthood and Chair of the ethics committee of the nation's largest stem cell company. He was hailed by the New York Times and by Harvard University Project Zero for his creating an undergraduate class in which students must submit fully articulate proposed legislation in bioethics to their home state government in order to receive an "A."

Dr. McGee is the acknowledge pioneer and leader in electronic outreach in bioethics. For example, in a joint effort led by Dr. McGee with Apple Computer and Google, he and his colleague Dr. Summer Johnson developed the most successful online graduate program in bioethics using technologies such as Apple's iTunes University and bioethics.net, the first bioethics website (which he founded in 1994). Glenn has three sons, Ethan, Austin and Aidan, and lives in Kansas City, Missouri.

 

Customer Reviews

6 Reviews
5 star:
 (4)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.7 out of 5 stars (6 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent and Engaging, October 30, 1998
By A Customer
We looked at several cloning books for our coffeehouse conversations series. This was the only one with good science as well as provocative ethics material. The article by Art Caplan and the religious material are excellent. This is the only book with an article by cloning scientists in it, and I found Ian Wilmut's perspective on the difference between adoption and cloning to be fascinating.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Most Informative Book I have read yet this year, May 8, 2001
This review is from: The Human Cloning Debate 2nd Edition (Paperback)
"The Human Cloning Debate" is the most informative book have read this year. The essays are fairly well balanced although there are more that are opposed than in favor. But, there are probably more people opposed to human cloning than are in favor. At any rate this is an excellent book.

There are several really good layman's descriptions of exactly what the biological results of cloning are. Big surprise, it is not what the media have led us to believe. On the other hand knowing the exact results does not seem to change the preponderance of opinion one way or the other.

One of the best essays in the book for describing the science was written by Phillip Kitcher, although I think the conclusions he reached were totally off base. He wrote "Reality is much more sobering, and it is a good idea to preface debates about the morality of human cloning with a clear understanding of the scientific facts" To many of us forced our ideas about cloning before we knew the facts.

Perhaps the whole debate was summed up in a single sentence written by Jonathan R. Cohen n his essay "Cloning in Jewish Thought". "Ultimately, cloning challenges us to consider how important our genetic structure is to our sense of self."

I would recommend this book to anyone who is interested in the ethical debate surrounding cloning.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Useful collection of contributions to this important debate, November 4, 2004
By 
William Podmore (London United Kingdom) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This is a thought-provoking collection of essays by 25 contributors, pro- and anti-cloning, scientists, doctors, academics, researchers, journalists and the odd US President. The most mind-changing essay for this reviewer was Ronald Bailey's `Cloning babies is not inherently immoral'.
Throughout history, some have violently opposed scientific developments. For example, Guardian columnist Jeremy Rifkin described biotechnology as `a form of annihilation every bit as deadly as nuclear holocaust, and even more profound'. This dispute between science and anti-science, progress and reaction, the materialist and idealist philosophies, can never be resolved. It is a fundamental philosophic divide that cannot be bridged. One or other must prevail.

The argument that we must wait for a consensus to emerge is reactionary, for this would mean waiting forever. No amount of additional debate can ever win round the opposition to progress, because that opposition is entrenched behind ramparts of dogma; faith-based, it is impervious to evidence and reason.
Presidential calls for a moratorium are prevarication. Similarly, the search for absolute safety, like all searches for absolutes, is a delusion, which makes the precautionary principle another recipe for stasis.
Some who oppose cloning opposed In Vitro Fertilisation earlier. Possibly one million babies have been born through IVF since 1978. This safe and beneficial procedure arose from decades of refining techniques in a variety of animals. Safe cloning will similarly result from animal research: a ban on research would prevent work into making cloning safe.
In Germany the government has banned all research work on embryos, so Germany makes no contribution and has no influence on this matter. Britain's parliament passed a law that regulates therapeutic cloning, but unfortunately bans all efforts at reproductive cloning.
Fear of biotechnology has done great harm, because technological stagnation poses greater risks than technological innovation. Banning stem cell research or research into reproductive cloning would prevent many promising developments in medical research; it could drive research to countries less equipped to balance safety with development. The biotechnology revolution has already brought enormous benefits, IVF for instance, and will bring many more, but only if we encourage and support research into cloning.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews




Only search this product's reviews



Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject