Contemporary debates in epistemology devote much attention to the nature of knowledge, but tend to neglect the question of its sources. The focus of "Human Knowledge and Human Nature" is on the latter, especially on the question of innateness. Peter Carruthers' aim is to transform and re-invigorate contemporary empiricism, while also providing an introduction to a range of issues in the theory of knowledge. He gives a presentation and assessment of the claims of classical empiricism, particularly its denial of substantive a priori knowledge and also of innate knowledge. He argues that we would be right to reject the substantive a priori but not innateness, and then presents a novel account of the main motivation behind empiricism, which leaves contemporary empiricists free to accept innate knowledge and concepts. He closes with a discussion of scepticism, arguing that acceptance of innate concepts may lead to a decisive resolution of the problem in favour of realism.
FREE Two-Day Shipping for students on millions of items. Learn more |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Book Description
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Very good introduction to contemporary issues in theory of knowledge. Exceptionally clear and concise."--Manuel Davenport, Texas A&M
"A careful reflection on the relation of human nature to the bases of our knowledge. Lucidly and engagingly written."--Leonard W. Ortmann, Conception Seminary College
"Students of philosophy will find Human Knowledge and Human Nature both instructive and provocative."--Times Literary Supplement
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
"Empiricism" defended by armchair evolutionary theory,
This review is from: Human Knowledge and Human Nature: A New Introduction to an Ancient Debate (Paperback)
"The overall conclusion of this book" (p. 193) is a defence of empiricism against rationalism, a conclusion which Carruthers immediately undermines as follows."Indeed, there is a strong case for saying that an empiricist should now accept the existence of innate information-bearing mental structures ... as well as the innateness of at least some concepts and some knowledge. Yet empiricism may still retain its traditional opposition to platonism, and more generally to the idea that we can obtain substantive knowledge by reason alone." (pp. 193-194). This seems nonsensical. Isn't the virtual definition of innateness that "we can obtain substantive knowledge by reason alone"? Let's look at the argument behind these claims. The argument is that "empiricists should have no objection to evolutionary versions of nativism" (p. 143), but that Carruthers cannot see how rationalist claims can be secured in evolutionary terms. Now, this could be due to a problem with *either* rationalism *or* Carruthers' armchair evolutionary theory. Since Carruthers naively assumes his evolutionary theory to be perfect, blame falls on rationalism. For example, the rationalist is challenged "to provide a naturalistic account of how the process through which we acquire beliefs about the abstract realm may be a reliable one" (p. 145). It is assumed that a failure to do so is a failure for rationalism, not a failure for Carruthers' amateurish evolutionary theory. The type of "account" Carruthers has in mind is something like this: "it might be said that mathematical truths ... [may] enable you to work out what would be a sufficient store of food to see your family through a winter" (pp. 149-150). But why should selection for mathematics have to do with some easily specifiable food problem? Why should the selection not be some complicated interaction involving several factors such as reproductive games which are known to be extremely complicated? Why indeed should evolution operate only in steps that small minds like Carruthers' can grasp? Carruthers' entire argument is based on the assumption that his amateurish armchair evolutionary theory says everything we could ever know about human nature and innateness. If this assumption is removed, nothing remains of his argument. This is essentially conceded when it is argued that classical rationalism was defendable given "the poorly developed state of science at the time, in particular from the absence of any sort of theory of evolutionary selection" (p. 143). But the possibility that Carruthers' own brand of armchair evolution is "poorly developed" is never considered.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Only Philosophy Book You Will Ever Need,
By
This review is from: Human Knowledge and Human Nature: A New Introduction to an Ancient Debate (Paperback)
Having read numerous philosophical books on epistemology, I can confidently say that Carruthers' book is among the best. Written with startling clarity and minimal philosophical jargon, Professor Carruthers offers a compelling naturalistic approach to epistemology based on a foundation of evolutionary nativism. He shows how traditional empiricists such as Hume unnecessarily rejected innate structures shaping knowledge acquisition only because the theory of Darwinian evolution was not yet available. The book considers the nature and origins of knowledge, provides careful critiques of traditional rationalism and Mathematical Platonism, and a convincing naturalistic resolution to the problem of induction. He ends supporting an empiricist epistemology which incorporates innate structures guiding knowledge acquistion (specifically inference to the best explanation). Carruthers powerfully demonstrates how evolutionary ideas can provide resolution to deep philosophical issues that have engaged philosophers since antiquity. The book is a gem.Yon Fishman, PhD in Neuroscience
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
