Customer Reviews

Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

5 star:		(0)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

You're looking for a way to convert your dead time in the car or on the treadmill into serious reading time. You looked up something like "philosophy audio" at Amazon and mostly got Deepak Choptra and a bunch of pious pablum. Very few serious works of philosophy are available on audio. This is one of the few, the material is well suited to the audio format, the production values are good, and all in all it's an adequate presentation of Hume's work. Go ahead and buy it.

However, this release is marred by godawful music in the transitions and whiny-voiced actors doing the dialog. The narrator (as opposed to the characters in the dialog) has a really unappealing voice. Who did the casting?

I am looking at the paperback, which allows me to weigh each word in considering the ways in which I consider myself far too free for a binding relationship with anyone else. Sometimes I am even amazed that I can post things like this on the internet. David Hume was dying when he realized how much he wanted this book to be published. His friend Adam Smith did not want to be responsible for publication.

Matters are hardly settled on the internet because every web page has its own operating assumptions. People who sign up for services can read a list of restrictions that commonly include limitations on intimidation or the use of copyrighted material. There are Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion by David Hume that discuss matters in a way that seeks to unite study and society. Our heritage includes orthodoxy and skepticism, but activities have been carried out by people who have become careless as they join others in profane liberty, equality, fraternity, and frequently think about getting a vasectomy to avoid producing the purest of bastards.

President Ford had been to Poland before he told the nation in 1976 during a TV debate with Jimmy Carter that Poland was a free country. In a global mix of relationships that could alter at any time, it is tricky to specify at which place a person may truly be a slave to someone else or free. Most Americans had observed global superpower conflicts in the nature of mutual denunciation societies, as Hume says of religions:

Each disputant triumphs in his turn,
while he carries on an offensive war,
and exposes the absurdities, barbarities,
and pernicious tenets of his antagonist.
But all of them,
on the whole,
prepare a complete triumph for the skeptic,
who tells them that no system ought ever to be embraced
with regard to such subjects:
for this plain reason
that no absurdity ought ever to be assented to
with regard to any subject.
A total suspense of judgment
is here our only reasonable resource.

Being slave or free is also a question of how much people will be willing to do for $14 trillion after the money has been spent.