Nobel Prize–winning economist Sen deplores the "little boxes" that divide us in this high-minded but seldom penetrating brief against identity politics. Sen observes that ideologies of hate typically slot people into communities based on a single dimension that trumps the multifaceted affinities of class, sex, politics and personal interest that make up individual identities. This "reductionist" us-versus-them outlook is not limited to jihadists, he argues, but is a widespread intellectual tendency seen in Samuel Huntington's "clash of civilizations" paradigm, in postcolonial critiques of democracy and rationalism as "Western" ideals, as well as in efforts to "dialogue" with moderate Muslims. (These last, he feels, pigeonhole Muslims in purely religious terms.) Sen rebuts the "singular affiliation" falsehood with a cursory historical, literary and cultural survey of the diversity of supposedly monolithic civilizations (Akbar, a 16th-century Mughal emperor and champion of religious toleration, is a favorite citation.) Sen's previous work (Development as Freedom) injected liberal values into development economics; here, he argues that the freedom to choose one's identity affiliations is the antidote to divisive extremism. Stitched together from lectures, the book is dry and repetitive. While Sen's defense of humane pluralism against narrow-minded communalism is laudable, he never really elucidates the social psychology that translates group identity into violence. (Mar.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
Violence is "promoted by a sense of inevitability about some allegedly unique--often belligerent--identity that we are supposed to have," argues Sen in this rejection of the civilizational or religious partitioning that defines human beings by their membership in a particular group. Reminding us that each person is actually a composite of many affiliations, the author informs us that he is Asian, an Indian citizen, a Bengali with Bangladeshi ancestry, an economist, a teacher of philosophy, a Sanskritist, a believer in secularism and democracy, a man, a feminist, and a nonbeliever in afterlife; he omits, perhaps out of modesty, that he is a Nobel Prize winner. Those who would define themselves according to one monolithic system of categories (read jihadists, communitarians, and Samuel Huntington and his followers), says Sen, ignore both the composite nature of humankind and the freedom to choose how much importance to attach to a particular affiliation in a particular context and, in doing so, perpetuate sectarian violence. The key to peace, then, is the rejection of stereotypes in favor of humane pluralism. Pithy and optimistic. Brendan Driscoll
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
Confusing. It was ok, but a heck of a lot to digest. It isn't light reading.Published 12 months ago by Fallon
Amartya Sen, the only Indian economist to win a Nobel Prize for economics, has written a splendid book. Read morePublished 12 months ago by Rajeet Guha
By far my favorite non-fiction, Sen really dissects the tendency not only toward societal movements that inflict violence but also by individuals based on the constructs of... Read morePublished 16 months ago by Lauren
I ordered this text for my a class for my masters degree and it was an interesting read even as a textbook. I not only learned something, but was entertained in the process. Read morePublished 18 months ago by Daryl A. Daniels
This book is interested in the question of human identity, its inherent multiplicity, and the choices that we make in regard to aligning ourselves with certain identities over... Read morePublished 18 months ago by A Certain Bibliophile
Mr Sen strongly defends the view that the hegemony of single identity (religious, national, cultural, ...) is a dangerous fiction, and it is increasingly so in a globalised world. Read morePublished 19 months ago by Mr G.
The ironic undercurrent is that Sen repeatedly argues against the illusion of a singular (or dominant) identity, yet his argument may only work if the reader's primary identity is... Read morePublished on August 27, 2012 by Rev Eric
I never met a self-respecting intellectual who gave any serious consideration to Samuel Huntington's thesis of the Clash of Civilizations. Read morePublished on January 12, 2012 by Etienne ROLLAND-PIEGUE