5 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent., July 20, 2000
By A Customer
Of course, I strongly recommend this book for anyone interested--even remotely--in Rosenzweig. But this book will also satisfy those who seek a fresh view of Judaism, religious thought, and, indeed, all the social sciences and humanities in general. In short, this book will change lives.
As a student of religion, I have been waiting for a book like this for quite some time. Bursting at the seams with relevance, Batnitzky's work manages both to resolve questions that have been tormenting me for years and to raise new ones I had not even considered.
You will not view religion in the same way after reading this book. In fact, if you are at all like me and my colleagues and peers, you will be seized by an uncontrollable urge to go back, to reread everything else you have ever read about religion, and to rethink it all utilizing these new Batnitzkian approaches.
The more I think about it the more I believe that this is the sort of book college courses could--and should--be designed around. There is so much here that students would do well to spend weeks, maybe months, analyzing its pages, delving into its explosive issues, and ultimately, weighing in their beliefs. Indeed, I have recently found myself asking (actually lamenting), "Where was a book like this when I was in college?"
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
"As we risk idolatry, we also risk non-idolatry", July 13, 2007
More than half century ago I turned to the history of ideas as a way of probing the presuppositions of the ideas that are most near and dear to us. After reading this volume, I realize that when we fail to plummet the depths of these presuppositions, we "risk idolatry."
If we are to become consciously aware of the presuppositions of all that which our ideas "represent," we are dependent upon our being open to the otherness of others. We meet one another not to "otherize" this otherness into the sameness of our own categories of thought -- perhaps categories we may have spend a life time cultivating -- but rather, for our own categories to be critiqued and enhanced by those of others.
But which otherness? In making the Jesus of history into the Christ of faith, Christianity has thought and taught that Hebraic presuppositions could be readily and easily refitted within the categories of Hellenistic philosophy, in so doing, supressing the Jewishness of Jesus. Although Christian biblical scholars now engage themselves in a third quest for the historical Jesus, with help from Leora Banitsky's IDOLATRY ANE RERESENTATION, I now find myself sharing a Jewish quest for the Jesus of history.
Perhaps a distant outcome of this quest will be a reference in the preamble to the Constitution of the European Union recognizing and acknowledging the Jewish origins of a religious faith that is less and less that of Christianity and more and more that of Islam.
How might Jews, Christians and Moslems one-another one another as they pray to the same God?
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No