| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
108 of 119 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Heart of Reilly,
By Dan Ackman (NYC) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Ignatius Rising: The Life of John Kennedy Toole (Hardcover)
I still remember the first time I read "Confederacy of Dunces" lying on the bed in my college dorm room, kicking my feet laughing. I have returned to it many times and still consider it the funniest book ever.So when I saw the biography of J.K. Toole, the author and suicide, in my local bookstore I had to buy it. I did not anticipate, though, being so swept up. The authors do an outstanding job compiling the minute details of Toole's too-short life, which could not have been easy since he was unknown and until well after his death. I was surprised how interested I could be in his grade school years-- although that is in large part owed to my fascination with Toole going in. The key mystery to me has always been about Toole's relationship with Robert Gottlieb. For an unpublished novelist (indeed he had barely published anything) to gain the attention of perhaps the leading book editor of his genration is incredible. What happened? Why was it not published? It's hard to fault Gottlieb. His letters-- reproduced over his own initial objoections-- show his committment to the book. On the other hand, his objections to the book-- that it lacked "meaning"-- were, however sincere, maddeningly unhelpful and unspecific, as he admitted. Thelma Toole is presented as a domineering, overbearing, grandiose nutcase. But her successful effort to finally have the book published shows a great strength. It's actually inspiring. Toole eventually killed himself after despainring of the book ever being published. This "failure" hardly explains his act-- how many failed authors go on with their lives or write a second book that is published? Suggestions are made about his homosexulaty (closeted) and his finances (bad since he had to support his parents). Neither is enough. But the events leading to the tragedy, the descent into madness, are touchingly detailed. One mystery remains. Nevils and Hardy, also first time authors, show that Toole was an excellent student, though hardly a world-beater when he ventured beyond New Orleans. They reproduce many of his letters. While the letters are fine, there is not a single inkling of either the prose style, the imagination, or the comedy that is on every page of Toole's novel. Though we are told constantly how funny Toole was in real life, we never see it. Where did the genius in the book spring from, and why was it not eviedent in any of his other work? A chilling thought occurred to me towards the end of the book. The authors reproduce a letter from Thelma Toole to her lawyer. Shen concludes a trademark harangue: "My nervous system is drained by this harrwoing legal matter." That's Ignatius all over. Is it possible that Thelma had a hand in the book or was-- even weirder-- it's ghostwriter? It's a bizzare notion and I have not one shred of evidence to back it up. But throughout the biography, Thelma is portrayed as not of the sensibility to even appreciate the book or its humor. Yet she is the one person-- including J.K. Toole-- who had the strength and faith to see the project through. In the end, I recommend "Ignatius Rising" to anyone who read "Confederacy" and loved it. As to those who read it and did not love it, they lack all sense of taste or decency. As to those who never read the novel, read it first, then read the biography of the tragic author who (probably) created it.
21 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Fascinating Look at a Tormented Soul,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Ignatius Rising: The Life of John Kennedy Toole (Hardcover)
Ever since I read "A Confederacy of Dunces" and heard the legend about how it got published, I have been interested in the character of its author. This biography provides an interesting look at the life of John Kennedy Toole and sheds some light on a complex man whose inner demons finally destroyed his spirit and ultimately, his life. His mother, probably the greatest influence on John, is drawn as vividly as he is, and comes across as a fascinating and maddening woman who nonetheless always believed in her son's work. Their relationship is at the core of John's life as well as his pain. The ultimate tragedy for us readers is that we won't ever see any more of his work. John's tragedy was that he thought no one would ever want to. A well documented character study that is a must read for anyone who is a fan of Toole's masterpiece!
24 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Mystery still not solved,
By A reader (Toms River, NJ) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Ignatius Rising: The Life of John Kennedy Toole (Hardcover)
I was very glad to find this book, after being haunted for 20 years by an eerie public silence on the life and death of John Kennedy Toole. It seemed strange that someone could produce such a great novel and then take his own life before getting it published and before writing anything else. It seemed incomprehensible that there was no published biographical information about such a person, particularly that there was nothing examining his unfortunate end.
"Ignatius Rising" gave me a lot of incidental details about Toole's life, but no better understanding of why he decided to end it so abruptly. Discovering that he only submitted the manuscript to one publisher raises the new question of why he didn't try again, and some other new but less interesting questions are raised. But I still wonder just as before how much the failure to get his novel published contributed to his decision, and whether sexual and maternal problems were also involved. There was already reason to speculate about all of that, based on the novel itself and on Walker Percy's introduction, and this biography only presented new bases for the same speculations. It didn't reliably confirm or deny any of them. Much of the evidence provided about those questions is suspect, as the authors themselves acknowledge, and even the more reliable evidence is often ambiguous or contradictory. Moreover, some of the conclusions the authors draw are so contrary to the evidence that I have to wonder whether they may have, handicapped by the same misunderstanding, omitted some important material. For example, on page 162 they present a 1968 interview with Bob Byrne, a close friend of Toole's, in which he says that "...the editor objected to the picture of the New York Jewish girl; they said it was anti-Semitic or something, but she's a typical Hunter (College) girl..." On the next page Nevils and Hardy discount that notion, saying that Toole "worried that the Jewish firebrand Myrna had become more of 'a cartoon' than the other characters. This concern may have been discussed with Gottlieb in a phone conversation or in some lost correspondence, but there is nothing to show who, if anyone, initiated this subject." The first sentence is obviously based on Toole's long, grovelling March 1965 letter to editor Robert Gottlieb (page 138) "Myrna turned into a cartoon, in a book where almost everyone else was basically real, ...". It may reflect Toole's genuine feeling, or it may reflect a desire to appear to agree with his editor. But the second sentence is simply wrong. In a December 1964 letter Gottlieb had written (page 131) "... What we think is this. That you are wildly funny often, funnier than almost anyone around, and our kind of funny. That many of the characters are wonderful -- Burma, Santa, Irene, Mancuso, Lana Lee, and others (Miss Trixie too). That certain things don't work: Myrna in particular. ..." That settles the question of who initiated the subject, and since Myrna is no more cartoonish than Miss Trixie or any of the other characters Gottlieb named, and no more offensive an ethnic stereotype than Burma or Santa, it's quite possible that Toole correctly understood Gottlieb's bias, kowtowed to it in his March letter, and later reported it accurately to Byrne. In the same letter to Gottlieb, Toole also apologizes for the Levys, who were the only other characters Gottlieb had objected to in his December letter ("That the Levys are not so hot.") In the March letter, Toole also reaches pathetically for opportunities to praise Jewish artists -- novelist Bruce Jay Friedman, creator of comical and stereotypical Jewish characters; and radio/TV stars Goodman and Jane Ace (Aiskowitz), who he says, absurdly, may have been a "hazy" model for the Levys. When combined with the grovelling apology for all three Jewish characters Gottlieb had criticized, that suggests that Toole may have been trying furtively to assure Gottlieb that he was not anti-Semitic.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|