Qty:1
Include

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Color:
  • Ilford Galerie Smooth Pearl Resin Coated Inkjet Paper, 290g/m2, 5
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
  • To view this video download Flash Player
      

Ilford Galerie Smooth Pearl Resin Coated Inkjet Paper, 290g/m2, 5

by Ilford

Price: $36.50 & FREE Shipping. Details
Only 2 left in stock.
Sold by Ornem and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
  • Smooth pearl surface - instant dry
  • 13x18cm Sheets
  • Superb photographic image quality and consistency
  • Heavyweight look and feel of a real photograph
  • Excellent compatibility with all high quality inkjet printers, especially those designed for photo output
$36.50 & FREE Shipping. Details Only 2 left in stock. Sold by Ornem and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

Ilford Galerie Smooth Pearl Resin Coated Inkjet Paper, 290g/m2, 5 + Ilford GALERIE Prestige Smooth Pearl 5x7 Inches, 100 Sheet Pack 2001744
Price for both: $66.45

These items are shipped from and sold by different sellers.

Buy the selected items together

Product Description

Galerie Smooth Pearl Paper combines the excellent Instant' dry properties of a porous product with the elegant finish of a pearl print. The heavyweight base produces prints with excellent consistency and superb photographic quality. The pearl surface eliminates glare and fingerprints giving the true look and feel of a photographic print. It is compatible with all high quality dye and pigment based inkjet printers. Good archival properties and fade resistance Weight - 290 gsm Opacity - 99% Caliper - 280micron (11mil) Tint - (Lab) 96.0, 0.2, - 4.7 Gloss - (60 ) 24%

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B00113FAH8
  • Item model number: 422500
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here
  • Date first available at Amazon.com: October 2, 2001

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By R. Jones on June 29, 2012
Verified Purchase
Good product. Photos printed on this paper look much more like a professional print. Epson papers have also always been good for me, but I haven't found Satin Finish pre-cut papers from Epson in the size and price I desire.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful By John on June 27, 2010
Verified Purchase
Quality of paper and photo print is great. However on the Canon 9000 Pro printer, the normal rear paper feed doesn't work with this paper and I need to use the front printing option, which is a manual feed.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Rob Worth on June 17, 2013
Verified Purchase
I like all the Ilford photo papers. However, I've found the Pearl view to be something that is only in the eye of the beholder. So, I shy away from anything with the Pearl look. That doesn't mean that you won't like it. Personally, I like the super gloss look because it resembles the photos you would get from film or even from a photo store print. Pearl, on the other hand, tends to give a completely different impression entirely created by the image being printed. Basically, it looks great for "some" images but not for all.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again