The Illusion of Full Inclusion: A Comprehensive Critique of a Current Special Education Bandwagon [Paperback]

James M. Kauffman (Author, Editor), Daniel P. Hallahan (Editor)

Book Description

Publication Date: August 1994 | ISBN-10: 0890796122 | ISBN-13: 978-0890796122

...nationally recognized individuals raise serious questions about the full inclusion of all students with disabilities into general education

Product Details

• Paperback: 362 pages
• Publisher: Pro ed (August 1994)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0890796122
• ISBN-13: 978-0890796122
• Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,018,755 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

38 of 39 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Essential reading, October 6, 1998

By A Customer

This review is from: The Illusion of Full Inclusion: A Comprehensive Critique of a Current Special Education Bandwagon (Paperback)

Sure to be controversial, this important collection of essays challenges the glib assumption that "inclusion" is best for all students. While acknowledging the huge benefits that inclusion holds for some students, the authors put forward the case that for other students, it may have equally huge disadvantages, both educational and social, and that by jumping on the bandwagon of "full inclusion", educationalists are actually seriously failing some students with disabilities.

Instead, the book argues, a range of educational possibilites are needed, so that each student's individual needs can be met most fully, with the goal being inclusion in society as a full and equal participant (which includes the right to be different). The essays include both those attacking the theoretical arguments involved and those which examine the issue with respect to specific disabilities such as autism, learning disabilities and deafness.

As a disabled person whose life was very nearly ruined by my experiences in the "mainstream", I hope that this book may cause some educationalists to think twice before sacrificing the rights of students with disabilities to the cause of "educational correctness".

12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Inclusion gives the Illusion of Success, April 20, 2008

By 

S. Holly (Arizona) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Illusion of Full Inclusion: A Comprehensive Critique of a Current Special (Paperback)

Inclusion is considered to be Special Education's largest bandwagon ever, as seen by editors, James M. Kauffman and Daniel P. Hallahan. In the mid 1980s, The Full Inclusion Movement (FIM) offered an attractive platform of general and special education merging into one with a system that supports all students' regardless of abilities or disabilities. After twenty years, the editors claim that the devastation of full inclusion is evident, leaving Special Education in a precarious position of trying to salvage it's original mission for students' with disabilities. This book is a collection of essays that throws light upon how FIM is nothing but an illusion of support for students in the classroom. The book is divided into three parts with twenty-three separate chapters. The first part addresses FIM from a historical context and addresses the issue of merging special and general education. The second part of the book discusses policy analyses, commentaries and research. It addresses topics such as the need for diverse environments in order to provide for an appropriate education, and the lack of preparation of teachers for the FIM. Finally, the third part takes a look at specific disabilities, such as blind, deaf and emotional or behavioral disorders, and it's appropriateness in the FIM.
One of the reasons the editors claim that the FIM gained such momentum was the availability of books that supported the rationale of Full Inclusion. As I set out on my research for a book on Inclusion, it was quite easy to find a variety of titles for Inclusion that discussed its rationale, the research, and its successful implementation. In fact, so convincing was the rhetoric of Full Inclusion that going against Inclusion, almost made me feel as if I were an insensitive, prejudiced human being and that I should reconsider my position on this issue. I was relieved to find this book, The Illusion of Full Inclusion: A Comprehensive Critique of a Current Special Education Bandwagon, by James M. Kauffman and Daniel P. Hallahan, this book gave me the necessary resource and support to write about this controversial issue.
This book represents as a complete source for my topic for many reasons. First, the editors are credible experts in the field of special education. James M. Kauffman is Professor Emeritus in the Curry School of Education at the University of Virginia. He has experience in both the general and special classrooms, and received an EdD in Special Education from the University of Kansas. In addition, he has served as President of the Council for Exceptional Children, and was a co-editor for Behavioral Disorders. Daniel P. Hallahan has a PhD in education and psychology and has served on numerous editorial boards for various Special Education journals such as Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, and The Journal of Special Education. He also has been honored by the University of Virginia for Outstanding Teaching in 1998 and for Outstanding Faculty in 2003. Second, the intention of the book was take a position on the issue of Full Inclusion, and to make educators aware of the other side of Inclusion, as indicated by the book's title. Third, the book covers an array of topics as it relates to Full Inclusion, such as the Least Restrictive Environment, an Appropriate Education, the purposes and outcomes of Special Education, and specific disabilities. Finally, as stated, this book is a collection of articles written by experts in the field of Special Education from all over the country and not just a concentrated area.