Imaginary Australian: Anglo-Celts and Identity 1788 to the Present [Paperback]

M Dixson (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: July 1, 1999

The Imaginary Australian argues that, in spite of its defects, Anglo-Celtic core culture has played a role in building what remains one of the earth's most decent and prosperous societies.

Product Details

• Paperback: 216 pages
• Publisher: University of New South Wales Press (July 1, 1999)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0868406651
• ISBN-13: 978-0868406657
• Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 12 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,962,638 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars The Centre Cannot Hold?, May 2, 2000

By 

Ben Wellings (Canberra, Australia) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Imaginary Australian: Anglo-Celts and Identity 1788 to the Present (Paperback)

Miriam Dixson's 'The Imaginary Australian' is an attempt to re-examine nationalism and national identity in Australia which poses some interesting questions, but also suggests some controversial solutions. It raises the question of the `role' of an ethnic majority in a multicultural society, but the answers it implies, if translated into social and political practice, might have dangerous consequences.

Throughout the book, Dixson stresses the interplay between individual and collective identities. Her cure for the nation's ills comes through a psycho-historical examination of Australia's past. Her emphasis on the needs of the individual met by belonging to a `national' community lead her to a sympathetic stance towards the role of the nation in the life of the individual. For Dixson, it is the so-called core, (Anglo-Celtic) identity which will `hold' the Australian nation during this period of change.

It is in this central claim that Dixson's argument is at its weakest. Translated into political terms, this assertion might imply that any expressions of non-Anglo-Celtic culture should be diminished during times of so-called transition and crisis, paradoxically stunting the emergence of a more diverse national community in Australia.

Additionally, the definition of the Anglo-Celtic community is left unproblematic. The unity of such a community could be questioned in the first instance. Beyond that, it would seem to be the erosion of the borders of the Anglo-Celtic community which provokes the identity crisis in the first place, but throughout the existence of a cohesive Anglo-Celtic community is assumed.

The strength of Dixson's work lies in its attempt to engage with the concerns over identity expressed within the Anglo-Celtic Australia, rather than just dismiss them as an anachronism. However, the attempt leads to a dangerous conclusion. If the Anglo-Celtic community is to `hold' the national community during times of change and crises, then these crises could be continually invoked, thus blocking the achievement of more open discussion about national identity in Australia which Dixson wishes to achieve.